Richard Ford, Home Correspondent
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
The number of migrants found to be illegally working in the private security industry is more than double the figure given by the Home Office last month.
More than 11,000 migrants were issued with the licences by the organisation set up to vet those employed as security guards and doormen, despite having no right to work in this country.
The latest figures show that an estimated one in four of 40,000 nonEuropean foreigners issued with licences by the Security Industry Authority (SIA) had no right to work in Britain – the first large-scale view of the extent of illegal working in low-paid jobs.
Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, told MPs yesterday that more than 6,600 immigrants had been given licences to work, 1,600 more than the estimate given to MPs last month. She said that the SIA had issued permits to a further 4,400 people who immigration officials now believe may not be entitled to work.
Initial estimates had put the figure at 5,000 but the figure has mounted as the SIA carried out a review of about 40,000 licences issued and checked the names against a database held by the Border and Immigration Agency.
Despite the admission that thousands of immigrants have been given licences, only 409 licences have been revoked. The SIA said that it took a minimum of 42 days to revoke a licence as those issued with the document had a right of appeal.
Ms Smith told MPs that the authority had written to more than 10,000 people telling them that their authorisation could be withdrawn. She said that the Border and Immigration Agency had started investigations into 328 of those referred to it, carried out 101 enforcement visits and arrested 15 people. By the end of January they planned at least 400 further visits.
The scandal emerged five weeks ago and it was disclosed that one of the illegal workers had been responsible for Tony Blair’s car while it was being repaired. Mr Blair was Prime Minister at the time. It was also disclosed that Ms Smith had accepted Home Office press office advice in August not to tell the public about the mistakes.
The SIA was set up by Labour to vet doormen and security personnel, with the intention of screening out those with a criminal record. The checks allow successful applicants to work on pub and club doors, as well as in sensitive security posts. Officials in the Home Office were first alerted to a possible problem in April, and in July the checks on everyone who had been issued with a licence began.
The Security Industry Authority has admitted that a form given to those seeking a licence does not contain a question asking them if they have the right to work in the United Kingdom.
It was only in July that processes were introduced under which information on applicants is sent to the Border and Immigration Agency for it to check against databases that show who has the right to work. Until the beginning of October a foreigner could be given a licence without necessarily producing a passport.
Nick Clegg, Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said: “We now know that over one in four employees may be working illegally, and that the most basic checks on their right to work were not taking place. Worse still, the Government appears to have been extremely slow in recognising the problem and slower still in coming clean about the sheer scale of it.”
Mr Clegg added: “Is it any coincidence that this statement has been smuggled out on the same day as 24 government statements, Gordon Brown’s appearance before the Liaison Committee and the signing of a new EU treaty?”
David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, demanded to know how the system had “gone so badly wrong” and said that there had been a “huge policy failure” at the Home Office.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I seem to remember the Home secretary stating that she had withheld this information until a 'FULL ANALYSIS' had been done; at which point, she declared the number involved was 5000.
Maybe its the English language - perhaps she actually said 'FOOL ANALYSIS'. well, that's the only explanation I can come up with :)
Douglas, kirkintilloch,
Urgent request - can somebody ask a times journalist to investigate the following- or a concerned citizen to contact their MP
To claim working age benefits all you need is a national insurance number and to state you are British- civil service have no system in place to check the true nationality of claiments.
This has been common knowledge for some time - but no action has been taken.
The above case shows the ease with which illegal immigrants obtain national insurance numbers - how were they obtained - and then accepted into the system?
As stated above- they could complete claim forms for a number of benefits- and tax-payers money would then be paid- no questions asked to confirm true nationality -and right to claim benefits.
Somebody please ask the Minister Peter Hain to give a full and detailed statement
brian, Birmingham,
Gous no big deal these people are filling a necessary gap in the labour market.
Why dont you guys invest your energy in getting angry about the fact that this country is invading countries like irak??? You milk the rest of the world but yet you get angry when you have immigrants working here. thats rather strange.
Jovan, proud Serb , Belgrade , Serbia
As a lawyer assisting security firms under investigation by the SIA, I feel no surpirise at all at the latest news. Well established and diligently run security firms around the country are having to lay off valued employees who cannot get a licence from the SIA because of their slow and ever-changing application process. It is a travesty that licences are being issued to illegal workers in massive numbers when the focus should be on assiting those in the industry already and supporting the security firms that want to retain their services.
Mark Hopwell, Nottingham, England
Is anyone really surprised? We hear of total incompetence by this government every day of the week. Spin and lies, lies and more lies.
Kate, Newcastle, England
When my American wife settled here we spent £1000s on Entry Clearance permission, visas, visa extensions, work permits and finally citizenship. I want my money back!!!! It seems like the only people who suffer the financial burden are the honest ones. This Government has lost control
Bob Jones, Sheffield,
If they now know that these people are working illegally, why aren't they deported? It make take 42 days to revoke a license, but by presenting themselves to the government, it should now be quite easy to send them home.
R Cogburn, Farnham, Surrey
"11,000 bouncers are illegal foreign workers" - Wrong, wrong, wrong.
For a start, as you go on to say, the SIA are responsible for security and door staff and 11,000 SIA badge holders are believed to be illegal immigrants. Last I checked only around 6,500 are known to be illegal immigrants with them not being sure if another 4,000 are allowed to work in the UK. And even if all of these are illegal immigrants they are not all door staff. And one of the reasons for the SIA is to differentiate between the bouncer image of old and the new professional image of the people working the doors.
Stewart Souter, Bristol,
What a disgrace!! The home secretary won't grant the police a small pay rise, yet 11,000 illegals can come and work in our country.
I think the home office and the immigration need to take a good long look at their working practices and get themselves into shape before there are no jobs at all in this country for the people who belong here.
Nigel , Redruth, UK
i have three sons all doormen,all have saved and scraped to be qualified doormen,as a family tradition, the sia cost them money,in the time it took to return the clearance for my sons to work.it is disgusting that this is how things are,i live in rural somerset and now it is over run with un qualified doormen i wonder why?
g.witcombe, radstock, england
for all of my sons 18th birthday it was my late husbands wish for them to carry on the trade of doormen,in the family, this cost money and time by them to get thier licence,just how insulting can this be to my family who were already in jobs paying tax etc,none have ever been unemployed,,just what does the government do all day??????????????????
g.witcombe, radstock, england
This is yet another example of useless, expensive legislation hindering ordinary people in their everyday lives, whilst doing nothing to increase security. Why would we expect anything else from the people who have brought us the police state?
Rob, Sheffield,