Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

The fight against gun crime is being undermined by judges who fail to ensure that tough penalties set down in law are imposed in the courts, a senior police chief has told The Times.
Bernard Hogan-Howe, Chief Constable of Merseyside, said last night that the mandatory five-year minimum sentence for possession of a firearm was being ignored by some members of the judiciary.
Mr Hogan-Howe, whose force is investigating the murder last year of 11-year-old Rhys Jones, said “very heavy sentences” were essential to deter criminals and teenage gang members from carrying weapons. It was, he said, “simply wrong” for judges to overlook the legal requirement to hand down a five-year sentence.
“The big issue for me is getting the guns out of society,” Mr Hogan-Howe told The Times.
“There will always be gangs and criminals but today it is the fact that they carry guns which makes them truly intimidating. If we can get the guns out of their hands then we will make our society safer.
“The message the criminal justice system sends out about the serious consequences that flow from possessing a firearm is an important part of deterring people from carrying guns.”
The Home Office confirmed that the five-year sentence for possession of a firearm, introduced in 2004, was not being uniformly imposed around the country.
The average sentence handed down for the offence in 2005 was 47 months and only 40 per cent of offenders were given the mandatory minimum sentence that year.
In May last year the Home Office circulated a memo to all judges, court clerks, barristers and police, reminding them of “the original policy intention of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: that the mandatory minimum sentence should be applicable to all offenders aged 18 or over”.
A Home Office spokesman said that ministers remained concerned that the courts were still not implementing the five-year sentence consistently.
But David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, condemned Labour’s failure to clamp down on gun crime. “The problem is that the Government is happy to pass tough laws in order to get a good headline only to simply not enforce them – allowing the situation to deteriorate at great risk to the public,” Mr Davis said.
“The Government have patently failed to get a grip on gun crime with a fourfold increase in gun-related violence under Labour.”
Mr Hogan-Howe said that his officers had held meetings with the local judiciary and representatives of the legal profession to discuss the impact of gun crime on the community.
The murder of Rhys Jones last August has made gun crime a hugely emotive issue on Merseyside. There was a public outcry in Liverpool earlier this year when two men, arrested by police in possession of 11 guns, were released on bail before their trial.
Mr Hogan-Howe said: “Generally I feel the judiciary are supportive about what we are trying to do about gun crime and we have seen some excellent sentences which send out the right message. But I would like to see that happen more consistently. Locally there is evidence of sentencing where the power has been available and not been used and that is simply wrong. I want very heavy sentences for possession of firearms which would deter people from arming others or carrying guns themselves.”
The Merseyside police chief said that in addition to a five-year minimum term for possessing a gun there should be a ten-year sentence for firing a weapon.
Mr Hogan-Howe said he accepted that there were “exceptional circumstances” where an offender should not serve the full term.
He added: “Where that situation arises the courts should deal with it through parole arrangements. The headline sentence is what people see and what sends out the message. Gun crime is our number one priority. Nobody wants to see another child shot dead, as happened here last summer. We are driving crime down across the board but all that work can be undone by a single gun incident. Guns remain a huge problem.”
The Home Office conceded that the five-year sentence was not being used as it had envisaged. But a spokesman said that average sentences for possessing a firearm had risen sharply.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It's simple, the Government cant afford to "house" the large numbers of offenders out there. 99.99% of prison places are in use! Where are we going to put these offenders? In tents?
Society is paying the price for the governments lack of provision. It reminds me of the old Soviet Union, we are defending our borders from our enemies (with Trident), even though every nationality lives here but what are we defending inside the realm?? Chaos, in many cities!
Graham, St. Albans, uk
the lenght of setence is not so much a deterrent factor as the likelihood of getting caught and convicted
the first thing is to find the guns by paying large rewards for information leading to the discovery of a hand gun
peter codner, devizes, england
Judges, the Police and Parliament have all played their part in forcing the public to tolerate rising levels of all kinds of crime - while all too often they sit on their hands quoting the latest version of their crime statistics.
If parents have difficulty saying no to their children, the authorities appear incapable of sending a clear message to criminals. Repeatedly warning offenders and then sending them back onto the streets should be made a criminal offence. If violent crime does not drop year on year, those responsible (see above) should suffer a cut in pay.
Martin, Kingsbridge, UK
No need to be "mealy-mouthed" about the affair Chief Constable. You know who the culprits are, let us know also.
Peter Hughes, Burnham, Bucks.
I think the Chief Constable is absolutely right in what he says. If there is a few judges that are not applying the law and sentencing these criminals appropriately then maybe it is time for the judges reasons to be made public and reported. This could be easily done by requiring the judge or magistrate to read out their reasoning in court before handing down the sentence. We would then see which judges are consistently not performing and steps could then be taken to remove them from their positions.
Steve, Manchester, UK
The doctrine of Parliamentary supremacy raises a question for the Home Office: If a few judges are refusing to do what Parliament has laid down, why hasn't there been a motion in each House for the removal of those judges?
Paul, Bristol, UK