2 for 1 tickets to Casablanca, this coming Monday

The fight against gun crime is being undermined by judges who fail to ensure that tough penalties set down in law are imposed in the courts, a senior police chief has told The Times.
Bernard Hogan-Howe, Chief Constable of Merseyside, said last night that the mandatory five-year minimum sentence for possession of a firearm was being ignored by some members of the judiciary.
Mr Hogan-Howe, whose force is investigating the murder last year of 11-year-old Rhys Jones, said “very heavy sentences” were essential to deter criminals and teenage gang members from carrying weapons. It was, he said, “simply wrong” for judges to overlook the legal requirement to hand down a five-year sentence.
“The big issue for me is getting the guns out of society,” Mr Hogan-Howe told The Times.
“There will always be gangs and criminals but today it is the fact that they carry guns which makes them truly intimidating. If we can get the guns out of their hands then we will make our society safer.
“The message the criminal justice system sends out about the serious consequences that flow from possessing a firearm is an important part of deterring people from carrying guns.”
The Home Office confirmed that the five-year sentence for possession of a firearm, introduced in 2004, was not being uniformly imposed around the country.
The average sentence handed down for the offence in 2005 was 47 months and only 40 per cent of offenders were given the mandatory minimum sentence that year.
In May last year the Home Office circulated a memo to all judges, court clerks, barristers and police, reminding them of “the original policy intention of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: that the mandatory minimum sentence should be applicable to all offenders aged 18 or over”.
A Home Office spokesman said that ministers remained concerned that the courts were still not implementing the five-year sentence consistently.
But David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, condemned Labour’s failure to clamp down on gun crime. “The problem is that the Government is happy to pass tough laws in order to get a good headline only to simply not enforce them – allowing the situation to deteriorate at great risk to the public,” Mr Davis said.
“The Government have patently failed to get a grip on gun crime with a fourfold increase in gun-related violence under Labour.”
Mr Hogan-Howe said that his officers had held meetings with the local judiciary and representatives of the legal profession to discuss the impact of gun crime on the community.
The murder of Rhys Jones last August has made gun crime a hugely emotive issue on Merseyside. There was a public outcry in Liverpool earlier this year when two men, arrested by police in possession of 11 guns, were released on bail before their trial.
Mr Hogan-Howe said: “Generally I feel the judiciary are supportive about what we are trying to do about gun crime and we have seen some excellent sentences which send out the right message. But I would like to see that happen more consistently. Locally there is evidence of sentencing where the power has been available and not been used and that is simply wrong. I want very heavy sentences for possession of firearms which would deter people from arming others or carrying guns themselves.”
The Merseyside police chief said that in addition to a five-year minimum term for possessing a gun there should be a ten-year sentence for firing a weapon.
Mr Hogan-Howe said he accepted that there were “exceptional circumstances” where an offender should not serve the full term.
He added: “Where that situation arises the courts should deal with it through parole arrangements. The headline sentence is what people see and what sends out the message. Gun crime is our number one priority. Nobody wants to see another child shot dead, as happened here last summer. We are driving crime down across the board but all that work can be undone by a single gun incident. Guns remain a huge problem.”
The Home Office conceded that the five-year sentence was not being used as it had envisaged. But a spokesman said that average sentences for possessing a firearm had risen sharply.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Everything you need to know, own or do

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/57
£22,950
The Midlands
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
£60k plus excellent benefits
Barclaycard
Stockton / Northampton
£
£55,000 - £75,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
£45,000 - £70,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Smart prices on ATOL protected holidays
Excellent online info & holiday selection.
Walt Disney World Resort Florida SALE!
From £619 per person!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It's simple, the Government cant afford to "house" the large numbers of offenders out there. 99.99% of prison places are in use! Where are we going to put these offenders? In tents?
Society is paying the price for the governments lack of provision. It reminds me of the old Soviet Union, we are defending our borders from our enemies (with Trident), even though every nationality lives here but what are we defending inside the realm?? Chaos, in many cities!
Graham, St. Albans, uk
the lenght of setence is not so much a deterrent factor as the likelihood of getting caught and convicted
the first thing is to find the guns by paying large rewards for information leading to the discovery of a hand gun
peter codner, devizes, england
Judges, the Police and Parliament have all played their part in forcing the public to tolerate rising levels of all kinds of crime - while all too often they sit on their hands quoting the latest version of their crime statistics.
If parents have difficulty saying no to their children, the authorities appear incapable of sending a clear message to criminals. Repeatedly warning offenders and then sending them back onto the streets should be made a criminal offence. If violent crime does not drop year on year, those responsible (see above) should suffer a cut in pay.
Martin, Kingsbridge, UK
No need to be "mealy-mouthed" about the affair Chief Constable. You know who the culprits are, let us know also.
Peter Hughes, Burnham, Bucks.
I think the Chief Constable is absolutely right in what he says. If there is a few judges that are not applying the law and sentencing these criminals appropriately then maybe it is time for the judges reasons to be made public and reported. This could be easily done by requiring the judge or magistrate to read out their reasoning in court before handing down the sentence. We would then see which judges are consistently not performing and steps could then be taken to remove them from their positions.
Steve, Manchester, UK
The doctrine of Parliamentary supremacy raises a question for the Home Office: If a few judges are refusing to do what Parliament has laid down, why hasn't there been a motion in each House for the removal of those judges?
Paul, Bristol, UK