Dan Sabbagh
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The presenters of Blue Peter were forced to apologise on air yesterday after it emerged that the programme faked the winner of a phone-in competition.
Nearly 14,000 children called to answer a question posed on November 27 last year and were charged 10p a time, but a technical failure prevented the BBC from picking a winner during the programme.
It is understood that, in panic, a member of the production staff randomly picked a girl who was visiting the studio to call from behind the scenes to give the correct answer.
When the girl went on air she declared herself to be “calling from London” – in reality she was in the same studio as the presenters. The child was then given a toy as a prize. She has not been named and is understood to be blameless.
The corporation now faces an inquiry from Icstis, the premium-rate phone line regulator, which can levy a fine of up to £250,000. Mark Thompson, the BBC Director-General, has been told to brief the BBC Trust about how the corporation is dealing with the issue.
Richard Deverell, the BBC Children’s Controller, made an “unequivocal apology”. He said: “Whilst I am satisfied that there was no premeditated attempt to deceive or mislead viewers, the decision to put a child on air in this way was a serious error of judgment.”
A spokesman for the BBC conceded that there had been a “serious breach of editorial standards” and said that it would not hide behind the technical problems. “The issue here is not that something went wrong, but what people then did about it. The phone-in should have been held over for another day.”
The problem emerged after a Radio 5 Live listener who had witnessed the incident e-mailed in on Friday after a discussion about the growing phone-in scandal that has affected all principal broadcasters.
The phone-in was held to raise money for children orphaned by Aids in Malawi. Unicef received 3¼p from each call, or £450.52. Telecom Express, the call handler, received £207.93, but donated it to the appeal. The line provider, Cable & Wireless, kept £727.25.
Don Foster, the culture spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, said: “When it’s reached the point that even Blue Peter has been implicated in this sorry mess then I think it’s fair to say there has been a serious failure with the regulator.”
The BBC is considering scrapping all premium-rate phone-ins on children’s television.
Jana Bennett, the BBC’s director of vision, has begun an emergency review into the incident. The inquiry is to be led by Andrea Wills, a former BBC employee, and will touch on whether it is appropriate to ask children to phone in. The BBC says that it rarely does so and does not seek to make a profit on callins as a matter of policy.
It is the second time that the BBC has been implicated in the premium-rate row, after it emerged that a supposedly live episode of Saturday Kitchen was pre-recorded. Premium-rate services are regulated by Icstis, which has been struggling to keep up with the revelations. The Channel 4 Richard and Judy, The X Factor (ITV) and the Five Brainteaser game show have all been implicated.
The BBC said that a new winner for the Blue Peter competition would be randomly selected from those who took part, under the supervision of an independent solicitor.
It has provided a special question-and-answer statement for parents on its website.
The statement
What happened?
A technical hitch prevented staff from randomly selecting one of the competition entries. As the member of staff thought no one was getting through, they asked a studio visitor to stand in as the winner
Who was the girl?
She was a Blue Peter Team Player who was visiting the studio after winning an unrelated competition.
Did she really know the answer?
Yes, but since she had been in the studio, she had an unfair advantage
Did she receive the prize?
Yes but only as a thank-you for standing in. She didn’t receive the competition winner’s badge or the formal letter that would normally accompany it
Have any other Blue Peter competitions been fixed?
Absolutely not
Source: Blue Peter website

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I was just wondering something, what would you all have done in that persons situation? What was the proper way to fix that problem? Im sure you all have some super great ideas of your own on how to have fixed that problem. Why dont you all share it with us?
Steven Long, Cookstown, Tyrone
Was the question poised by Blue Peter one that had been prepared earlier ?
Frank Greaney, Formby Liverpool, United Kingdom
It's not the presenters fault, they knew nothing of what was happening as they were live on the air. It was not fraud but just a big cock-up. It was not deliberate fraud like the premium rate phone scams it was the result of an accident and the competition was for UNICEF. The competition is being done again with all those who entered. They have also scrapped all phone-in competitions like this one for good which is more than any of the other programmes who operate phone scams are doing. ITV, Richard and Judy etc are all looking to bring back these competitions asap. Blue Peter has always been the most reliable and trustworthy of childrens programmes. Throughout it's 50 year history it has had a few controversial problems but it always comes out with it's well earned reputation intact. It has educated and entertained children for decades and lets hope it continues.
J. Chambers, Dublin, Ireland
I worked as an engineer at BBC Television Center from 1970 - 1980, and believe me, any illusions I had about the "integrity" or "professionalism" of many TV programmes did not last long.
Ed Shields, Phoenix, Arizona
This children's programme has been on the air for decades; it was designed to teach children how to behave, how to have integrity and openness and how to be imaginative by designing and making things out of plastic bottles, bits of wood, paper and cardboard.
Now it ends up joining the rest of the television phone-in programmes in 'scamming' people but this time it actually cheats children. What the hell is wrong with the programme managers and the presenters that they have to resort to such underhand methods when, allegedly, a piece of technical equipment does not work. What does it say to them, that if something does not work then cheat? That is not teaching them to be either flexible, imaginative or honest.
Perhaps Blue Peter has run its course and was taken off the air.
Kenneth Armitage, Suffolk, England
Trust is a paramount virtue for children to learn. The presenter(s) have clearly deceived the children that he/she/they are role models for. They should have the courage to resign and if not they should be dismissed. Ignorance is no defence.
They are a disgrace!
Mark, Dudley, West Midlands
It wasn't a "serious breach of editorial standards, it was fraud, even if the BBC didn't benefit. The kids were de-fraud-ed. Can we please call a spade a spade?
Ali C, Warsaw,
How can the current presenters carry on in their jobs ,? they have shown that they do not posses one ounce of integraty, and they should therefore resign for the sake of the children that they have deceived.Valerie Singleton would not have accepted the decision to abuse the trust of their young viewers . SHAME.
Tom Cooper, York, England