Alexandra Frean, Education Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The most gifted 10 per cent of primary school children are to be offered extra classes under plans to track the brightest 400,000 through school and into university.
Under the scheme, to be announced by Tony Blair on Monday, children as young as 4 will qualify for summer schools at universities, as well as online tuition, Saturday morning classes and joint activities with bright children from other schools.
The scheme will extend the reach of the National Gifted and Talented Youth Agency, which is aimed at 150,000 pupils in state secondary schools. It was set up in 2002 after concerns that middle-class parents were abandoning the state sector for private schools because mixed-ability teaching failed to challenge the brightest pupils.
The initiative coincides with the release of figures from the Independent Schools Council suggesting that the growth in admissions to private schools is being driven by the primary sector. Pupil numbers in state primaries have fallen by almost 300,000, to 4.1 million, since 1997, and prep school numbers have increased by more than 14,000, to 159,000.
Downing Street emphasised, however, that the scheme aimed to ensure that more bright children were identified early on. A source said: “This is about helping each child to reach their full potential. That means identifying and developing the talents of children from an early age, and at the same time giving extra support to children who are struggling.”
Under the scheme, each school will be required to appoint a teacher to select the 10 per cent most gifted and talented children. Assessments will be based on teacher assessments and the results of national Key Stage 1 tests that children sit at the age of 7.
The term “gifted” is taken generally to apply to children of high intelligence, while “talented” refers to those with outstanding ability in a specific area, such as art, music or sport.
Bethan Marshall, a lecturer in education at King’s College London, said: “Some children who are not labelled gifted and talented might feel like failures if they are not selected, particularly if they come from a competitive home. Children who are selected may feel it is an expectation that they have to live up to.”
Peter Congdon, an educational psychologist and director of the Gifted Children’s Information Centre, said that research had shown that teachers had insufficient training properly to identify gifted and talented pupils.
“Teachers tend to choose children who produce good work on paper and who behave themselves. What are known as ‘gifted disabled’ children, who may be very intelligent, but also dyslexic, may be missed, as may the ones who are very bright, but who are misfits,” he said.
Alan Smithers, Professor of Education at the University of Buckingham, said: “If it is intended to buy off the middle classes it won’t work because what they want is a good all-round education,” he said.
Sir Cyril Taylor, the chairman of the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust and the driving force behind the National Talent Register, the existing table of the 5 per cent of pupils with the best scores for maths and English, has not been consulted over the plan to extend the programme to primary children.
Sir Cyril cautioned against diverting attention and funding from the gifted and talented programme for secondary schools and said that neither scheme would work unless those running it knew exactly what they were aiming to achieve.
The announcement will coincide with the release of the names of the ten local authorities that are to pilot a scheme to measure pupil progress.

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
In the article, it is implied that the National Gifted and Talented Youth Agency (NAGTY) is for the state education sector, however this is not true. I am a member of NAGTY, and I attend an independent school, and did so at the time of my enrolment. I am under the impression that NAGTYs aim is to cater for the top 5% of pupils in England.
Furthermore, I consider the idea of teachers appointing the top 10% in a school under the extension of NATY to be unfair. I believe this is so because in two state secondary schools, for example, one may have a higher academic standard than the other. The top 10% in the better school would generally be more able than the top 10% in the other school. As a consequence the provision would not be uniform, for example, student X in the better school may not qualify in the top 10% of its school, but that students academic counterpart, student B, studying in the other school, would qualify. Shouldnt the actual top 10% be receiving the necessary support?
Gauri Vithlani, London,
In the article, it is implied that the National Gifted and Talented Youth Agency, NAGTY is for the state education sector, however this is not true. I am a member, and I attend an independent school, and did so at the time of my enrolment. I am under the impression that NAGTYs aim is to cater for the top 5% of pupils nationally. Furthermore, I consider the idea of teachers appointing the top 10% in a school under the other extension of NAGTY to be unfair, as it is not uniform. I believe this is so because in two state secondary schools, for example, one may have a higher academic standard than the other. The top 10% in the better school would generally be more able than the top 10% in the other school. Consequently the provision would be unfair. For example, student X in the better school may not qualify in the top 10% of its school, but that student's academic counterpart, student Y, studying in the other school, would qualify. Shouldnt the actual top 10% recieve this support?
Gauri Vithlani, London,
The Japanese have been doing this kind of thing for many years with young children to invest for the future economy of their country, as well as professions that are essential for them, eg research science etc.. Problem with the west is that we put our children through a 'sausage machine', following the same curriculum for every child at a certain age and stage without the opportunity of adapting appropriate changes for those that are talented or gifted from an early age. Sadly, they get put with the alsorans that can hold them back in performing because it involves too much extra work over and above what is already expected of teachers these days.
It is a good idea to open universities for summer schools for that matter, to give these young children the same opportunities as everyone else to access education if they want it and feel the need to aspire to greater heights.
Frances, Hutton, UK
You don't need to apply a selection criterion to pick out talented children. Just give a choice between football or an evening tracking bats. The minority with an interest in biology will choose the bats.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK
Four years old is too early an age for us to identify children who will prove to be among the most motivated able adults in later years. Indeed, as we discovered from the days of the 11 plus examination, some abilities don't flower until much later, including science and mathematics. As abilities develop in an educational environment that gives the maximum opportunity for growth in intellectual and creative skills we can expect teachers and parents to identify abilities in children and for a large percentage of children to emerge in at least one area of high ability as the years go by. There should be a red flag warning against choosing an artificial educational elite at an early age when children should be allowed to be children.
Dr Clifford Denton, Norwich, England
If you're bright we'll inflict EXTRA lessons - school is for averages - excellence requires detention.
THis is a clear indication schools are "not fit for purpose". If "Educo" means to "lead out" it appears Government schools are to "repress" and "suppress" excellence in favour of achieving norms
TomTom, Leeds, England
Leave the poor sprogs alone! Clever kids get picked on enough at school as it ain't cool to be brainy. They hardly need extra classes, and singling them out will just ruin their social lives.
Anna, Soton,
It's quite instructive to see the input from academia that's quoted on this subject, and on the wider disaster that is new labour's education policy.
For example : the idea that presenting intelligent kids with opportunities to maximise their potential can't be considered because it might upset the others is truly pathetic coming from a lecturer in eduction. Wait until they get into the employment world....although how long can it be before NuLab decides hiring on the basis of ability is unfair too.
Don't get me started.....
Mike T, Haslemere, UK
I pity the poor heads and teachers when having to deal with the pushy middle class parents who will be manoeuvring to have their offspring labelled as gifted... And if private schools are anything to go by, you can be assured that certain parents will always be able to swing it their way.
David, Only Mildly Pushy Middle Class Parent , Cambridge,
It was admittedly a long time ago, but my education came to a screeching halt when I went up to Cambridge and attended tutorials given by people who had no grounding in how to teach effectively and no incentive to get any.
Shouldn't addressing this be a higher priority than prepping children until they're heartily sick of being branded "talented"?
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
I learnt all about the Kings an Queens of England, wnen playing fag-cards as a six year old: the best eduacation for children, is when they do not realise they are being educated.
R Lines, ilminster, Somerset
So selection at 11+ is bad but selection at age 4+ will be fine! What warped thinking, Guess which families will have the time to drive the glamour children to the nearst University? Some of us live over 40 miles from one!
DAVID VINTER, Louth, Lincs,, UK.
This initiative is totally at odds with established New Labour policies. It is almost certain that potential candidates will have to come from a deprived or disadvantaged background and be aflicted with some form of behavioural disorder. Gifted or talented children from stable caring families must be disqualified for being elitist or priveleged - this is the Labour way!
peterj, Norwich, Norfolk
This is a brilliant idea. One should however take care that intelligent individuals classed with under achieving peer groups within the state educated sector, are not ignored in favour of the more easily identified, though no more intelligent children, at private schools throughout the UK.
Gerry, Kassel, Germany
Instead of all thus tinkering at both ends of the educational spectrum, why don't the government stop messing about and just bring back selection and grammar schools in all areas.
keith, london, uk