Alexandra Frean, Education Editor
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Government claims of improved examination performance are based on lower test standards, according to an end-of-term report on Tony Blair’s education record as Prime Minister.
The school curriculum has been narrowed, and teachers are being forced to teach only for the next tests, say Anastasia de Waal and Nicholas Cowen, authors of the study by the right-wing think-tank Civitas.
“Better results in our schools give no assurance of better-educated pupils. They often signify worse educated pupils,” the report concludes. Ms de Waal said that Mr Blair had failed in his aim of closing the gap in achievement between rich and poor children because his emphasis on league tables and targets had broken the link between achievement and learning. The Government had become sidetracked by structural reforms and innovations.
“The Government is not allowing teachers to have the autonomy to teach. If we really wanted to see better standards, we would leave the teachers alone — they are suffering from initiative overload,” she added.
The report cited research from Robert Coe, of the University of Durham’s School of Education, that found evidence of grade inflation at A level. Dr Coe compared the A-level results of students with verbal and mathematical reasoning test results, and found that a candidate given an F in A-level mathematics in 1988 would, on average, get a C in 2005.
Students of average ability in 1988 gained E grades in geography and biology and Ds in English literature, history and French. In 2005 teenagers of similar ability were awarded C grades in all six subjects.
At GCSE, grades had also been inflated, the Civitas report claimed, largely because of the increasing numbers of students taking vocational qualifications that the Government deemed equivalent to four GCSEs.
The report also questioned the validity of primary school test results. It noted that, in Year Six, for four months normal teaching was discarded for nearly half the time and pupils were coached for national curriculum SATs.
John Dunford, of the Association of School and College Leaders, disputed the report’s explanation of A-level grades. “Teachers have got better at coaching students for exams. The modular system of A levels has also helped to raised achievement because it means that pupils don’t have to learn everything for last-minute tests,” he said.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If standards had not risen in the last 20 years it would be astoundingly bad news. In that time we have seen:
1. The introduction of cheap publishing using colour. Take a look at the books available 20 years ago and compare them to what pupils use today.
2. The content of the books has been produced using word processors and other computer aides - no longer have they seen at best a single re-write. The content is clearer and more understandable.
3. Language labs were rare, today anyone can have one.
4. Computer games from pre-schooling and above provide Victorian style drill in a playful way that youngsters lap up.
5. Teachers have gone from writing on boards through photocopying to providing content on line, through OHPs projectors to video projectors.
6. Everyhome can now have a copy of the Encyclpedia Britannica on DVD (along with several others).
7.Buy books easily on-line, lots of books.
8. Better trained teachers.
And the list goes on.
How can things not improve?
C Barlow, Preston, UK
to be honest theese are all comments from people who have long since left a 6th form schools as a student how can you say that they are easier when you personally have not experienced them yourself? I am a 17 year old 6th form attendee and i am just starting to apply for my first few universities, the pressure to succeed is immense and who are you to judge ?
Mike, Birmingham, UK
S Lord's attempted put-down of the research would be more effective if s/he looked for a legitimate target. There were F grades at A level in 1988 although these no longer exist.
G Kinsey, London,
My experience as a sixth-form college teacher suggets that the Civitas report is spot-on. Every year we receive a large intake of students with a healthy crop of GCSE subjects, who are nowhere near as capable as the exam results suggest, but whom we are expected to get through A levels.
Most of them have been so spoon-fed through GCSEs that they have long lost the habit of thinking for themselves, and they expect to be told precisely what to write; they are indignant and often angry when we refuse. So far we are holding out, and after a year, those who survive to AS level are much improved. However, this then leaves us only 12 months to get them up to the standard needed for A level exams - so it's no surprise if they too are easier!
Yes, we have become expert at getting students through exams; it doesn't mean we have turned very average students into genuine university material. The whole thing frequently feels like an elaborate and expensive fraud.
Gill, Southampton, UK
There's a simple way of telling if the exams have become easier. Just compare the Lett's study guides from the mid 1980's to those available now. Each book comes with a summary of the course syllabus from the relevant exam board. Back in the 1980's there were over 30 different exam boards, each with their own pass mark threshold.
Michael, Edinburgh, Scotland
There's an easy way of settling this question. Let pupils now have a go at papers from the past, marked according to the same criteria. See how they score.
I for one have few doubts. When I was a schoolboy it was known that standards were rising; in all subjects, material from the 1st year undergraduate syllabus was creeping down to A level, and what was A level material 5 years ago was appearing in the O level papers.
Nowadays the opposite is true, and we have university departments in despair because students arrive without the skills or the knowledge to tackle the ordinary 1st year syllabus. There is talk here and there of extending courses which have always been of 3 years by an extra year to cope with this problem.
It will be a long job to educate a new generation of teachers who know and aim for what our young people are really capable of. The first step is honestly to acknowledge the problem.
Michael Bruce, Selby, Yorkshire
This should have read, A levels are considerably easier than 20 years ago and easier still than 30 years ago.
Judy , Liverpool, england
I sugges they go back and do their research as you can't get a "F" at A level....
S Lord, Bolton,
Isn't Mr Dunford's statement that, "The modular system of A levels has also helped to raised achievement because it means that pupils donât have to learn everything for last-minute tests,â the same as an admission that they have made the exams easier? He also omitted to say that allowing repeated attempts at modules and changing the weighting of certain questions had also achieved the same effect.
Stephen, Ipswich, Suffolk