Jack Grimston
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
GOOD state schools are being barred from choosing pupils from middle-class families by the government's education watchdog on admissions.
The schools have been hit by a series of rulings which block them from doing anything that might be seen as giving preferential treatment to middle-class applicants.
The policy is being forced through by the government in a drive to use admissions to tackle "segregation" in society. The judgements, which set a precedent extending throughout the state school system, include:
- Banning headteachers from asking parents why they want to come to the school, in case this puts non-English speakers at a disadvantage;
- Barring schools from asking for children's birth certificates in case this identifies the parents' jobs, which might give professional families a competitive edge;
- Forbidding a discussion with parents of the school's Ofsted inspection report as this might discriminate against parents who "do no understand bureaucracy";
- Stopping schools asking parents whether they support its ethos because this might be considered "patronising" to less well-educated or ethnic minority parents.
This weekend the moves were attacked as "social engineering" by opposition politicians who said they were likely to make parents feel guilty for taking a close interest in their children's education.
"Schools should not be about social engineering, they should be about providing the best education," said Michael Gove, shadow schools secretary. "The determination of the government to micro-manage the admissions process reflects the fact that they don't have enough places in good schools. They are trying to find more and more interventionist ways of rationing access to good schools."
It follows a government-commissioned report last week which called for the greater use of lotteries to award places at popular schools to stop middle-class parents colonising catchment areas and monopolising entry.
The rulings have been issued by Philip Hunter, the chief schools adjudicator, who decides if councils and schools policies comply with the government's code on admissions. He said: "Parental choice in the market leads to segregation."
He is acting in line with demands by Jim Knight, the schools minister, that a new law on admissions be firmly enforced to prevent "pushy" middle-class parents from dominating places at the best schools.
Hunter, who denies that he is pursuing a policy of social engineering, said that local authorities and schools were involved in delicate judgements.
"At some stage when the market is travelling in that direction someone has to say that level of segregation is OK but that one is not. That is a very difficult decision to make," he said.
"Local heads and admissions forums and local authorities have to make that decision. That is not easy. They have been asked to make it in the code, they have got to address it.
"Everyone has got to understand that it is a very difficult judgement. Even more difficult is if they decide it is an unacceptable level of segregation and they are going to do something about it. At that point you say to parents that their parental choice is being denied." Jim Knight, the schools minister, last month warned councils that they had to work harder to enforce the code which was passed into law last year.
"No ifs or buts," he warned them. "There is absolutely no excuse not to comply with the law to stamp out unfair and covert admission practices," he said.
But Professor Alan Smithers of Buckingham university, special adviser to the Commons schools select committee, said the code was "untenable" as it tried to stamp out covert selection by intervening in "minor matters", but at the same time still allowed schools to retain catchment areas and faith-based allocation of places, both of which tend to favour middle-class families.
“It just encourages game-playing ," said Smithers. "We are stuck with this fudge of a code and the result is these adjudicators dancing around on the head of a pin.”
Additional reporting: Sian Griffiths
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I am a middle class parent. The government school I am thinking of sending my child to, will tell me nothing about its standards and attitudes. It condescendingly explains that this is because it is their policy not to do so. I am given the impression that they are hiding something which can only be bad for my child. I will send my child to an independent school. I will leave the government school to take those children whose parents cannot afford the alternative.
Paul Francis, Brisbane, Australia
Was I a cynic, then three cheers for the government from all Independent schools should be called, I think. Those in the independent sector will be expecting another upsurge in business after the results of the lotteries have been announced. So far this government has provided demand for the equivalent of nearly forty schools the size of Eton. Keep up the good work!
Andrew, Guildford, UK
It is tragic that Britain is still stuck in the old politics of envy, where 'middle-class' is a term of abuse. In any other country it is (rightly) a compliment.
Andrew May, De Panne, Belgium
Absolute nonsense. This is reverse discrimination at it's worst and is extremely patronizing to those people who have a different skin color or name or education than what the bureaucrats see as "normal". Why is there an assumption that working class parents are too stupid to figure out "bureaucratize" or will be REFUSED information because they "might not be able to understand it"?
And these same bureaucrats write that working class parents "do no understand bureaucracy". They need to check their own educational backgrounds if they didn't see that glaring error.
alice, salado, us/tx
For goodness sake don't blame Labour for this fine mess. Study the history of education since 1988 and remember where it all began;which government it was that started us all down the road of competition, choice and diversity; who emasculated the Local Education Authorities and put power in the hands of parents; who decided to create the quasi-market in education. The only surprise was that the Left was caught off-guard when New Labour took over these Tory policies and pursued them with a vengeance, doing things that even the Thatcherites baulked at. So now, having reaped the whirlwind, they are desperately trying to find a way to minimise the worse effects of the market. The only trouble is, the genie's out of the bottle and it won't go back in again. It would take real leadership, real guts, and not a little humilty to admit that it was all wrong in the first place; that schools are schools, not markets, and that the model doesn't work. Not likely with an election on the horizon...
Robert, Loughborough, England
Why don't you British just go ahead and turn over your country to the Muslims and the minorities without going thru with all this bureaucracy? It would save you a lot of trouble.
The "middle class families" can move to the USA. We need y'all right here!
Derek, Seattle, USA
More than anything this will lose Labour the next election.
The vague evil of the notion of 'social segregation' does not compete with the horror of sending my sweet four year old into a state school regime so imbecilic that the headteacher is prevented by law from into gaining an insight into whether his charges have parents who are interested in their children's education.
Andy Laurillard, Brighton, UK
Typical bureaucracy gone mad. It wont stop the pushy middle class parents who will be the ones most able to employ a good lawyer to sort out who said what and then sue. The entire admissions system should be changed to a lottery within a catchment area and all parental choice removed. Within 10 years this will reverse the trend of good pupils gravitating towards "good" schools and the bad ones ending up in so called "sink" schools. The law of averages will take over and schools performance will even out.
Nik Bartlett, Chippenham, UK
Yet another example of how this Labour Government are intent on dragging everyone down to the same level.
Jim Scott, Prestwick,
It would appear that it is a common bain of the middle class in all English speaking countries that the education of our children and more specifically the administration of that education , has been entrusted to a clique of overpaid idiots with strings of letters following their names. BS,MS and Ph.D. short for bull,, more and piled higher and deeper. We hope to send our kids to institutions of higher education but find we receive only an education of higher institututions.
Earl Dewey, Wallingford, CT/USA
If such individual measures as described above are necessary, there is something very, very drastically wrong with the way in which school places are allocated. There are only two workable systems: (1) neither parents or schools have any choices as to whom to admit, and school admission is based on locality (and, in the case of children with special needs, those special needs); or (2) there is a fully free market, where both parents and schools have a choice fettered only by the right of the other to choose. Anything in between creates catastrophic perverse incentives incapable of achieving any worthwhile social ,educational or efficiency goal.
The sort of oppressive micromanagement described above is wholly unjustifiable under any circumstnaces, bar none. If it is proper to leave the decision to schools, it is is wholly improper to oppress the manner in which they decide by such an extreme degree.
James E. Petts, Burnham, England
This will in fact increase and deepen segregation as people will chose areas and towns where all the schools are good. Middle class flight from the city will become a flood.
Labour are idiots who learn nothing from the past and hardly pause to think things through - and off course ensure their own children are special cases going to private or near private (London Oratory anyone) schools.
Man in a Shed, Woking, England
Stand back and watch the fireworks....and the horrendous drop in standards. Already in my school it costs thousands every year hearing appeal after appeal then fighting litigation after litigation. The whole thing is ridiculous, chaotic and already causing massive resentment and the worst thing is, that this won't achieve non segregated schools because it is quite often black families, not white, that stick together and send their kids to the same school. Meddling Labour have to go...quickly.
judy, Liverpool, England
What ever happened to parental choice???
Pushy parents (and I am one) want the best for their children, we dont want to be part of a social engineering to create 'bog standard comprehensives'. Having attended a bad secondary school myself, I dont want the same for my children. My nearest school has a GCSE pass rate of 20% compared with 80% at another nearby school.
I am an ethnic minority who has work very hard to get to university and I want to make life a little easier for my children.
Gordon Brown, you should concentrate on making all schools good instead on bring good school down to a low level.
Linda, Hastings, UK
The "pursuit of excellence" seems to be a goal that this one size fits all government fails to want to encourage. The USA is wealthy because those who can afford a good education get one, and the actions to lump every one together are seen now to have been a failure and educational segregation is being accepted as normal, as it always was. After all, someone has to "sweep the streets" so why not let those that are suitable do so, but being paid a reasonable income and be treated generally well. The "everyone must have a degree" pursued by Nu Labour is a failure with plumbers, etc earning in many cases much higher incomes than, for example, media specialists who are in a market place where there are just too many.
B J Deller, Marbella, Spain
Is this a ploy by the government to further stretch hard-working middle-class families and force them to educate their children privately? Very underhand and very clever. Another stealth tax. . I strongly believe the good schools will be dragged down rather than vice versa. What about parent choice in such a vital decision?? All this about patient choice in the NHS is political claptrap set to further the governments aims. Double standards everywhere...
Rachael, , bristol,
so i can send my kids to a faith based school without any questions being asked of me. If parents cant speak english they should not be resident in this country.
Yet again its PC gone mad lets bow to the lowest common denominator in society and leave our best and brightest to rot. Give our immigrant friends the best of everything and let the indigenous population fall by the wayside. The government are so afraid of insulting the religions that they run from any kind of confrontation on our door step yet cant wait to invade other lands. We worry about the rise of nationalism in the country and yet we are no longer able to be patriotic. I cant fly the flag of my country outside my door for fear that l may be prosecuted for offending people who have come to shelter under the blanket of security it provides.
The government should not be worried about being PC they should however be worried about bishops who get death threats
simon, newcastle,
This is just really really scarey!
Ian Anderson, Knutsford, Cheshire
I am sure I am missing something but could we not forget about catchment areas, social engineering and the like and just let parents apply to any school they like? Then all the good schools will flourish and expand and the bad ones will have to close down.
John, London, UK
The main offenders in covert selection are Voluntary Aided and Foundation Schools.
All admissions should be administered by Local Authorities.
Norman Harris, Stalybridge, UK.
Bemused by the ruling to stop parents whether they support its ethos because this might be considered "patronising" to less well-educated or ethnic minority parents. Many so called "ethnic minority parents" would be aghast at being lumped into this category. Many among these communities -- among the first generation migrants -- are likely to have attended top schools in the countries where they come from. They would strongly support and value a school's "ethos" , standards and traditions. A good education for a child is major priority among "ethnic minority parents".
Seren Thomas, Watford,
I may be incorrect, but didn't this government promise parental choice in selecting a school for their children? Now this has been shown to be the impossible aim it always was in reality, surely they should now strive to raise the standards in schools which are underachieving and attempt to give an education which suits youngsters of all aptitudes. Why not bring back technical colleges which would give skills education to youngsters who are not academically inclined. Then we may have enough plumbers, electricians etc. without the need to look overseas for these tradesmen.
Rod, Preston, UK
So that element of population that funds these schools is now being barred from sending their children to them.
martinG, reading, UK
The harsh reality of life and I mean LIFE, is that if you are malnourished, and a large proportion of white working class Britain is, you mind will be starved of the nutrients required to reach any level of intellectual capacity. So, if we are to create an even playing field, then we need to improve the diet of those who are currently so stressed about other things they lose the will to eat well.
Azitiz, Oxford,
Don't they have better thing to do like employing more teachers instead of a bunch of adjudicators? Maybe then the school standards and education would rise.
Nick, miami Florida, USA
This is typical - an education system that aspires to A-levels in burger flipping is beneath contempt!
Dick, London,
Parents feeling they are being denied the school they prefer should " strike" keeping their children away from school, forcing the government to sue them all one by one. Will probably take a 100 years.
David Vinter, Louth Lincs,, UK.
This article makes me, a lifelong Anglophile, glad that I live in the People's Republic of New Jersey - not in Britain.
Allan Bilder, Hammonton, New Jersey USA