Alexandra Frean and Nicola Woolcock
Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more

The Times school choice survey results
Parents unhappy with the secondary school allocated to their children are being urged by the Schools Minister to appeal against the decision. His words come as a survey by The Times finds that one in five pupils will miss out on his or her first choice today.
Jim Knight told The Times that many parents would feel “let down” by the schools admissions systems in their areas. “It’s not the end of the road,” he said. “I know parents might not want the hassle of appeals but I urge them to do so if they feel they have a strong case.”
His comments risk raising expectations for thousands of parents who have little hope of meeting the criteria for a successful appeal. They are also likely to anger some schools and local authorities that will have to meet the extra bureaucratic demands.
Union leaders criticised the Government’s rhetoric on choice and the appeals system, saying that it gave parents unrealistic expectations and created wasteful bureaucracy. John Dunford, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “Oversubscribed schools spend many, many hours, which should be used for teaching and learning, on justifying admissions decisions. This is unfair to current pupils and a waste of their time.”
Mr Knight was speaking as it emerged that the first local authority-wide experiment of allocating places at oversubscribed schools by lottery has backfired.
Figures to be published today by Brighton and Hove council will show that 22 per cent of children have missed out on their first choice of school this year, compared with just over 16 per cent under previous admissions rules. Its mission was to bring greater fairness and parental choice. Other councils will be watching to see if the experiment leads to a big increase in appeals. Brighton and Hove council expects that it will.
A Times survey of 36 councils suggests that almost 20 per cent of five families have failed to get children into their preferred schools.
Today is “admissions day” and about 560,000 children will be receiving their secondary school offers this morning. if the Brighton figures are replicated across all 150 local authorities in England, about 100,000 families could be preparing to challenge the places allotted to their children, nearly double the number in 2005.
In some local authorities, mainly in London, four in ten were not granted their first choice.
Even before Mr Knight’s intervention, some councils said yesterday that they expected a flood of appeals following the introduction of a tougher new admissions code, which demands more transparency in the allocation of places.
In an unusual departure from the standard government rhetoric on the importance of parental choice on schools, Mr Knight conceded that any such choice was limited. He said: “Choice is not about a guaranteed place at a first-choice school. It’s about having real options in your town.”
Although limited, choice now was greater than when Labour came to power in 1997, he added. “A decade ago a child had a one in two chance of going to a low-performing school – with less than 30 per cent of pupils getting five GCSEs, including English and maths. That’s down to a quarter.”
Both the Government and local authorities insisted that they would be able to cope with any increase in the volume of admissions appeals, although none could say with certainty how many there would be this year.
In 2005, the last year for which figures are available, 57,000 parents lodged an appeal after their children were denied places at their preferred school. Just under 42,000 cases made it to an appeal hearing and, of these, 15,150 appeals were successful.
Michael Gove, the Shadow Schools Minister, said that urging parents to mount appeals was an admission of failure. He added that a Conservative government would end allocation of school places by lottery, saying that the system, used in Brighton and Hove and in parts of Hertfordshire, London and Derby was unfair and made parents feel powerless. “Lotteries do not improve parental choice,” he said. “More parents have been disappointed and this system [in Brighton] has not worked.” However, he stopped short of ordering the Conservative-controlled council in Brighton to scrap its lottery system.
Has your child missed out on their preferred secondary school this year? Email us at gug@thetimes.co.uk
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It would be nice to have a choice. All senior boys in Windsor go to Windsor Boy's School. All girls go to Windsor Girl's school. No point in "applying" or "appealing". That's all there is. The only co-ed school, The Princess Margaret Royal Free School was closed down so the co-ed option isn't there. SEN children are supposed to cope in these schools. For the majority of SEN children, 1,000 plus other pupils is too much to cope with. They need small schools, a lot of 1 to 1 teaching, and places where they can "time out" when everything gets too much for them. No choice for them either. David Cameron made a big song and dance about there being no special needs schools for his son, though he did find one in the end. Welcome to our world David. There are no SEN schools in Windsor, just "resources" at normal schools, which are totally unsuitable for children on the Autistic Spectrum.
Beryl, Windsor, England
When I started secondary school I walked to and from the school in a big group of girls as we all lived near each other and went to the same school. We were safer in a group because we were aware paedophiles existed even when I was young. If young boys and girls are making their way separately to all different schools, have the parents a right to challenge the decisions based on the safety problems of the children? I do wish these government quangoes and advisers would consider if their proposals will aid evil people before they produce their reports.
Joy Hodgson, Rawcliffe Goole, East Yorkshire
A lottery system is not unfair, in fact it is fairer because it takes geography out of the equation. There is no reason why within each priority area a lottery system should not work effectively. What is unfair is a system which treats village children, who are clearly going to be further away from local schools, as second class citizens. The current system is largely based on discrimination by geography. In Hertfordshire the education authority closed many village secondary schools in the 80's on the misguided view that the population was decling. Now every year all village children who aren't following siblings literally have to argue their case in front of a panel of 'experts' at appeal. Many are successful but almost all of the children know that they will be split up from their friends and are still unlikely to go to their nearest school.
judy shardlow, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire
My son selected a school less than 1/2 a mile from where we live in Herts as his 1st choice. He was not offered a place her, nor was he offered a place at his 2nd or 3rd choice schools. Instead he has been offered a place at a school that is not even within the Local Authority Area in which we live. Added to this, I have discovered that at least 5 children who go to his current primary school have been offered a place at the school which was my son's 1st choice, despite the fact that they listed it as their 2nd choice, live further away from it than we do, do not have a sibling there, and do not have special needs... Fair selection criteria ... ? I think not!
Sean Hurley, Rickmansworth, Herts
Brighton & Hove Council have made a huge mistake in intoducing this so called 'lottery' scheme for admissions.
We need more schools NOW, to accomodate all the new developments in the area that will increase the school age population.
The only way, we as parents, can force a re-think from the council, is Parent Power. Mass protest, and boycot the inappopriate offers made to parents.
As we are a large part of the population of Brighton and Hove, the council will have no alternative than to make changes for the better.
We voted for this council, and we can just as easily vote them out !
PARENT POWER.
Paul Rose, Brighton & Hove, UK
The lottery system is ridiculous because it would mean that a child may be unable to attend a school on their doorstep and instead would have to be shipped across their town or city to attend another school! How exactly does this help with
1) childhood obesity (children no longer able to walk to school)
2) global warming (increased transport usage)
3) failing schools (it just spreads around the problem of disruptive children fro the current failing schools to the good ones)
Ever heard of joined up politics?
Andrew Brown, derby, UK
A lottery is the preferred socialist mechanism for everything as the ultimate piece of bureaucracy. The government has made hospital admissions a lottery, in effect, and would like to do the same with schools. At university level, someone hoping to go to Oxford does not mind a place at Cambridge but would not want the University of Bolton. The same is true of schools. The truth is there are now so very few state schools that even attempt to give a decent education that parents are desperate.
George, Bolton, UK
bring in education vouchers - its the only way
Mehtab, new southgate/london,
Until schools are able to provide an education that is appropriate to the needs, aptitudes and interests of each pupil, there can never be any real choice. Since they can never achieve this, schools are not the solution.
Schools' performances are judged against mainly academic criteria of 5 'good' GCSEs. These measurements cannot possibly represent the entire breadth of possible educational experience and the criteria are thus quite specious. They measure what can be conveniently measured to produce statistics that prove that the government is good and that we should continue to vote for them.
It is not the choice of school that is important, it is the choice of education. 'Education in this country will never function effectively until pupils, at least at secondary level, can choose their areas of study and do not spend every day wastefully being forced to learn much of what they do not want to know.' (A. J. Marsden letter to TES).
For a real solution visit www.wotnoschool.com
John Harrison, Rye, E. Sussex
Its al abit messy,so the d.n.a data base the government wants cant come soon enough and all the decision about school place can be made at birth by the government,
michael joseph heavey, cahersiveen>adams towns, madness
- 1
- 2
Next