Alexandra Frean, Education Editor
2 for 1 tickets to Casablanca, this coming Monday
A pledge by Labour to have half of young adults in university by 2010 is destined to fail, with new figures showing that the proportion has scarcely risen over the past eight years.
Despite the Government throwing hundreds of millions of pounds at widening university access and expanding degree courses, figures for the past academic year showed the proportion of 18 to 30-year-olds at university was just 39.8 per cent, up from 39.2 per cent in 1999.
The figures for men are worrying for Ministers, giving rise to fears that a generation of young men risks being “locked out” of university and marginalised over jobs.
Last year the proportion of young males studying for a degree fell to 35 per cent from 37 per cent in 1999. The only bright news for the Government is the rise in young women enrolling for degrees, from 41 per cent in 1999 to 45 per cent last year.
Overall, university participation dropped from a peak of 42 per cent of young adults in 2005. This can be attributed to a temporary surge in student numbers that year, as students rushed to enrol before the introduction of £3,000 top-up tuition fees in 2006. The long-term trend, however, remains decidedly flat.
David Willetts, the Shadow Universities Secretary, said that it would take ministers more than a century to reach their 50 per cent target at the current rate of progress. It was, he said, the equivalent of reaching in 2006 a target that had been set by Gladstone in 1888.
Mr Willetts said he was particularly worried about the widening gender gap in higher education, with the gap between the number of men and women applying to university widening fivefold under Labour.
“These shocking statistics show that many young men who could benefit from going to university are not getting the choice. It was not supposed to be like this,” he said. “We need to do far better to spread opportunities for young people to go to university. That means reform of our schools and changing attitudes to higher education, but under this government we are completely flat-lining.”
Sally Hunt, general secretary of the University and College Union, described the “minimal” increase over the past eight years as worrying and blamed the introduction of top-up fees for the lack of progress in the past two years. She said: “There is still not the evidence to support a theory that charging more for higher education is likely to encourage students, particularly from non-traditional backgrounds, to study at university.” Ms Hunt urged ministers to treat the figures as a warning when they review tuition fees policy next year.
But ministers said record numbers of students were going to university and emphasised that the fall from 42 per cent was a temporary blip caused by the introduction of top-up fees.
Bill Rammell, the Higher Education Minister, said that acceptances and applications to higher education in England this year were at an all-time high, having recovered strongly, with 17,730 more students accepted in 2007. He said: “A year from now we expect the counterbalancing rises of 2007-08 to increase the participation rate.”
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Everything you need to know, own or do

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/57
£22,950
The Midlands
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
£60k plus excellent benefits
Barclaycard
Stockton / Northampton
£
£55,000 - £75,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
£45,000 - £70,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Smart prices on ATOL protected holidays
Excellent online info & holiday selection.
Walt Disney World Resort Florida SALE!
From £619 per person!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Well said Edmund Burke.
BillQ, New Delhi, India
As a retired lecturer, from a working class background, I remember the academic debate, in the philosophy lectures I attended as a student, about the tools of argument we use to establish truth. In the 1960's it was all about "logical truth", in disciplines such as Mathematics, or "empirical truth", as in scientific experiments. (Principles of morality, and political ideals, belonged to the category of "value judgments", which couldn't be proven.)
Now it appears that the whole system has been stood on its head: socialist political ideals are treated as absolute truth, so it is "logically impossible" for one eleven-year-old to be less intelligent than another. Hence the total disaster of comprehensive secondary education and the down-grading of universities to their present status as tertiary-level comprehensive schools.
Edmund Burke, Kingston upon Thames, England
Someone earlier raised (tongue in cheek) the prospect of PhDs in 'Urban waste management'. As a non too modest PhD in Physics, might I suggest that this is all PhDs in Psychology, Sociology, Politics, Economics etc are? The academic wonderland isnt coming. It arrived in the fourties and fifties when the academic alternative to Sciences shifted from Classics to basket weaving. Perhaps the LSE bears more guilt than the Polyversities.
E Skelton, cardiff, wales
Until and unless the wealth creating sectors of the UK economy get the encouragement and support they need, you can forget about the need to produce endless streams of bored, let-down, debt-ridden graduates.
The priorities in the UK have been badly skewed over the last decade - we are now losing some of our brightest and best entrepreneurs who are fed up with having their hard-earned money continually lifted to pay for social engineering experiments.
MarkS, Leeds,
Labour seem to think everyone should have a degree.
If that was the case, a degree would be as useful as a chocolate fireguard. The fact is, we need a larger portion of society to not have a degree. Otherwise whats the qualifications going to be to get a job as a street cleaner? A Phd in urban waste management?
Arthur, Newcastle,
The trend is that UK companies are seeking better quality graduates from abroad now as opposed to home grown ones. Says something of the quality of the 39.8%. I can't see the next 10.2% making the grade. Diminishing returns.... spending other peoples money.... socialist equal oucome utopia et cetera et cetera.
i.e., Norwich, England
Female graduates as secretaries and shop girls is less problematic than unemployed male graduates. Ted Short used to say he wanted shop girls with degrees and I think that is a distinct probability. The largest employer of graduates is the public sector and no doubt teaching will be able to employ graduate classroom assistants - but men may prefer not to carry debt, or not to carry debt from UK universities where its small economy offers no prospects for technically-literate compared to say the USA.
The Comprehensive University is a poor investment and will create a lot of unmarriageable, depressed and indebted female graduates over coming years. Kingsley Amis was right.
TomTom, Leeds, England
When I went to university, it was on a grant (not quite a full grant) and without parental support - a genuine encouragement to continue my education. Nowadays, young people from poor backgrounds are expected to be willing to take a risk and put themselves in significant debt to obtain the same education. It is hardly surprising that the majority of teenagers find it difficult to see beyond the allure of cash in hand.
And, at the same time, league tables are driving schools to push pupils towards lesser qualifications; universities are offering degrees in meaningless subjects, and science faculties across the country have been closing. I see little to encourage today's youth to find value in further education.
ACS, Bristol,
Fifty percent of the male population have IQ's below a hundred, and this is a appaling recognizable fact. Until we raise the IQ's of those who are below a hundred then it is unlikely the government will achieve its target.
kevin, Lincoln, UK
If 10% go to university then the 90% who don't see themselves as normal. If 50% go then the 50% who don't make it will have a very different image of themselves. This is storing up real trouble for the future.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK