On the whole this would seem to be a good thing. The comparison is perfectly apposite. The thing about Sir Walter Raleigh is that he really was the celebrity lyrical poet of the age. His poems were written as songs or to be read aloud.

Some of the characters in Shakespeare quote odd lines from Raleigh poems. We now think Raleigh and Shakespeare are in a category of literature that’s completely above pop music, but no authors at the time knew their work would last.

It takes time to find out what is going to endure. Who knows whether Amy Winehouse won’t be looked at in 50 or 100 years as one of the great lyricists of our time? We just don’t know. There is a slight problem in that lyric poems were also intended to be read without the music.

The number of contemporary pop songs that could stand scrutiny without music is questionable, as they are almost always written with the intention of being sung to music.

Part of the exercise is for students to work out that sort of thing. These days people are more laid back about high and low culture, and I think we now recognise the borders are now very permeable.

Jonathan Bate is Professor of Shakespeare and Renaissance Literature at the University of Warwick

Times Recommends

• What makes the perfect mum?
• To keep me stress-free, no more awareness days, please
• What do lottery winners buy?