Alexandra Frean, Education Editor
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

School Gate blog: why parents have lost confidence in SATs
The proportion of 11-year-olds achieving top marks in the national curriculum tests in English, maths and science has dropped significantly this year.
Results of Key Stage 2 primary school tests published yesterday show a steep decline in the number of children attaining Level 5 scores, the maximum possible.
It suggests that the brightest students are being neglected as teachers concentrate on raising the attainment of borderline pupils performing at just below national standards.
The provisional results for Key Stage 2 show that the proportion of children achieving a Level 5 score in English fell from 34 to 29 per cent, in science from 47 to 44 per cent, and in maths from 34 to 31 per cent.
While part of the fall can be attributed to changes in the marking scheme, this does not explain the scale of the drop — the biggest year-on-year decrease since Labour came to power.
Overall the results show that almost four in ten 11-year-olds are still leaving primary school without mastering reading, writing and maths.
Only 61 per cent of the 600,000 children who took national curriculum tests this year reached Level 4 — the standard expected of their age group in all three subjects.
The statistics, published by the Department for Children, Schools and Families, do, however, show an improvement on last year at Level 4.
The proportion of 11-year-olds reaching Level 4 in English improved by one percentage point to 81 per cent, and in maths by the same amount to 78 per cent. In science, 88 per cent of children achieved a Level 4 pass, the same as last year.
Jim Knight, the Schools Minister, welcomed the improvements at Level 4, but accepted that the fall in Level 5 passes was disappointing. He attributed the decline in English to a drop in performance in writing, not in reading.
“What this says to me is that we need to do better on personalised learning, regardless of ability,” he said.
He added that a new programme to improve writing ability would be introduced in primary schools from next month. This would involve new teaching materials and techniques that will get children to discuss their writing assignments before putting pen to paper.
Traditionally writing has been taught “in arrears” with pupils completing a writing assignment and then discussing it, he said. Now, teaching will focus on developing the writing before and while it takes place.
Nick Gibb, the Shadow Schools Minister, said the results suggested that the brightest children were not being sufficiently stretched. “Only one in eight 11-year-olds is now achieving the top Level 5 in the 3Rs,” he said.
This year’s results were published amid widespread concerns about the administrative errors in the marking and provision of results by the private contractor ETS. About 70,000 Key Stage 2 scripts were missing from yesterday’s figures and more than 450 schools are still waiting for some of their results.
The results were depressed slightly by the decision this year to end the practice of “borderlining”, in which students scoring a few marks below the pass mark were automatically re-marked. But this was not sufficient to account for all the decline in Level 5 results.
Mr Knight insisted that the results were reliable, although he accepted that there was room for improvement in the testing system. However, John Bangs, assistant secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said he did not understand why the tests had been published. He said: “The previous decision to remove borderlining, combined with ETS’s incompetence, can only increase the size of the question mark over the results.”
Chris Keates, the general secretary of the NASUWT union, said that the results showed “steady and sustained progress”, which reflected the hard work of teachers and pupils.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
To Eileen:
Teachers like yourself should have better grammar ;)
To Everyone:
But this raises an interesting question (assuming the statistics are accurate for the moment): if you can only do one or the other, is it better to save the lowest mass at the bottom or promote those at the top?
David, Norton Canes,
Never mind, with a bit more effort from the government for next year I'm sure the results will be massaged to show SATs in a better light. Plenty of practice with the crime figures, GCSE's and A levels over the years.
Jay, Reading, England
I agree that marks have a lot to do about how you help educate your kids at home. Like Kareema my son was level 5 at the end of year 5 and the teachers assessed him as level 5a at the end of year 6. His SATS mark came back as level 4.
Sorry but think the marking is dubious not the teaching!!
Lesley, Kent,
Well at least Labour can say they have narrowed the gap between the best and weakest achievers.......Doh!!
MarkS, Leeds,
The SATs results published are neither lies nor damned lies. However, neither are they statistics. They are a mass of figures which are known to be incomplete and not known to be properly checked for accuracy in recording and aggregating.
No one can draw any conclusions whatever from them.
David Heigham, London,
Teachers like myself who taught in the sixties,correctly predicted the slow slide in education to where we now are English & maths need constant practice with achievement ,variety, pleasure and praise essential. To discuss essays is useless if language rules are not known, practised & supervised.
Eileen Morrison, Norton Canes, Staffs
Four in ten leave primary school with inadequate skills in reading, writing and maths so don't stand a chance at Secondary School. This is a disgraceful result after 11 years of Labour crowing about it's policy of Education, Education, Education. Labour's top down policies simply don't work.
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
My daughter who is only 10 did the KS2 sats this year and scored level 5 as expected by her teachers. She is not a genius but I agree on the "personalised learning" if it means support from home. 90% of my daughter's learning came from home. Children can do it does not matter about the age.
kareema, bielefeld, Germany.
If average marks had risen, the press would have claimed that exams were becoming easier. It's a no win situation.
Jonathan, Barry, Wales
"What this says to me is that we need to do better on personalised learning, regardless of ability,
What is this 'personalised learning'? Is this yet another bit of spin by any chance from yet another Labour MP? There isn't any time for 'personalised learning' in the average primary school.
judy, Liverpool, England