Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

A terminally ill woman has begun a landmark legal battle to win the right to die so that she can bring to an end her acute suffering caused by a rare heart condition.
Kelly Taylor, 30, wants her doctors to increase her morphine dose to induce a coma-like state and then obey her wish not to be kept alive artificially.
Mrs Taylor won the right to a hearing at the High Court in London next month. The action could affect thousands of people who are suffering from terminal illnesses.
Her lawyers, using the European Convention on Human Rights, will combine her legal rights to have adequate pain control with her right to have a “living will” that will state her desire not to be resuscitated or fed food or liquids artificially.
The medical team for Mrs Taylor, the General Medical Council and antieuthanasia campaigners believe that such treatment amounts to euthanasia and is illegal.
Mr Justice Kirkwood said yesterday that he would alert the Attorney-General to the case because a potential ruling under civil law could affect criminal law.
Mrs Taylor was born with a hole in the heart and suffers from Eisenmenger’s syndrome, a painful and debilitating condition that causes breathlessness, palpitations and fainting as well as increasing the risk of a stroke and kidney problems. She is severely disabled and has a spinal condition called Klippel-Feil syndrome.
She is too frail to undergo a heart and lung transplant, and is allergic to many of the medicines that are used to treat her conditions. She has been told that she has less than a year to live.
Her lawyers will claim that the United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust, St Peter’s Hospice in the city and Mrs Taylor’s doctor have a duty to treat her pain even if it results in her death.
Last year she attempted to starve herself to death as an act of voluntary euthanasia. But after 19 days without food she was in such severe pain that she started eating again.
Mrs Taylor, from Bristol, was too unwell to attend the hearing but said afterwards: “I have made the decision because enough is enough. I don’t want to suffer any more.
“I’m not depressed and I’ve never been depressed. I am a happy person. But my illness is now at the point where I don’t want to deal with it any more. In the next year I will deteriorate and that deterioration will become quite undignified. I want to avoid that.
“I hope the court will come to the conclusion that the decision by my GP and hospice was unlawful and that I can be sedated to the point that I become unconscious. And secondary to that, that my living will should then come into effect so that I can die.” She had considered travelling to Switzerland to commit assisted suicide but feared that her husband, Richard, with whom she recently celebrated their tenth wedding anniversary, could be arrested upon his return.
“I got to the stage of trying to find out about tickets and so on, but then I became too ill to travel by aeroplane. I had also watched other people fly over there and saw what happened to their loved ones when they returned. I didn’t want Richard to be investigated,” she said.
“I don’t want to die in a foreign country, I want to die at home. While I have respect for people who go over there [Switzerland], it really shouldn’t be necessary. We should have a law over here.”
Despite her pain and being confined often to her bed, she has studied for seven A levels because she was “terrified of boredom”. She is currently studying for an A level in English literature.
Deborah Annetts, chief executive of the pressure group Dignity in Dying, said that Mrs Taylor was in an “intolerable position”. “Her case highlights the impossible dilemma that the current law presents to patients with terminal illness, where pain and palliative care do not work to relieve their condition,” she said.
Richard Stein, the solicitor for Mrs Taylor, said: “We have advised our client that she is entitled to seek this treatment and that it is unlawful for doctors to deny it to her unless they also take steps to find a doctor willing to provide it.”
A British Medical Association spokesman said: “While we sympathise with Ms Taylor’s situation, we cannot support her request for doctors to sedate her to a state of unconsciousness with the specific intention of ending her life.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
People make comments about doctors "playing God", the truth is they played God when they kept Mrs Taylor alive when she was born and they are playing God in keeping her alive artificially. So what difference is there in removing her artificial feeding and sedating her so that she dies painfree?
I know the Hippocratic Oath says to preserve life but this Oath was invented before there were so many procedures invented to keep people alive beyond hope.
Christine ter Meulen, Hayes, Middlesex
Is it fair for Doctors to be asked to end a person's life in this way? It goes against the Hippocratic Oath, but if Mrs Taylor is successful in utilising this legal loop-hole, I think it should open up the debate over Euthanasia again. The current legal situation is nit-picking over words and intentions when the desire and result is the same.
Sam, London,
Kelly Taylor is absolutely right. Doctors need to consider and respect teh wishes of their patients in such deeply difficult cases. They can do her no good by continuing to keep her alive. At least do no more harm.
Chris Taylor, Cape Town, South Africa
What is more cruel: to die a long, slow, lingering death or a swift, painless, assisted death? Too often we (the healthy) impose what is tantamount to torture on the ill and infirm. We make ill people go through levels of suffering that we convict non-medical/non-official people for doing. We (well meaning people) won't act positively because it eases our consciences and not the suffering of the "victim". We are kinder and more considerate to our animals than we are to our own species! So when a conscience and intelligent person decides that enough is enough we get on our high horses and impose this regime of torture to ensure that that person suffers even more and for longer. When are we going to realise that death is inevitable, but the manner of our death is not. We are rational, thinking beings. We decide how to live are lives - why can we not decide (for ourselves) how we meet our deaths?
Vaughan Morgan-Jones, Leicester, England