Valerie Elliott, Countryside Editor
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona

Bernard Matthews could face prosecution over sloppy biosecurity at the Holton factory in Suffolk where the avian flu virus infected turkey chicks and 160,000 birds had to be destroyed.
Unprotected waste, including scraps of dead turkey, was left outside the processing plant in breach of EU animal byproduct disposal laws.
Scientific experts believe that infection may have spread from discarded carcasses, feathers or other detritus by scavenging gulls, rats or mice and been carried to the turkey-rearing part of the premises.
The poor hygiene conditions on the premises reported in The Times last week were described in a preliminary veterinary report from the Government yesterday.
A spokeswoman at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs confirmed that investigations were continuing with a view to possible prosecution.
Bernard Matthews — which has a turnover of £400 million a year — and its trade links with Hungary remain a central focus of the investigation.
The unresolved mystery is how the lethal H5N1 virus, an almost identical strain to the infection found in geese in the Csongrad county of Hungary, arrived in Holton, near Hales-worth. Experts said that the virus match was 99.96 per cent similar.
Experts at the Veterinary Laboratory Agency are testing for the virus in meat products held in cold storage at the Holton plant. The tests can take five to ten days and are not conclusive.
So far, state vets, inspectors for the Food Standards Agency and the Meat Hygiene Service have been unable to find any specific link between the two outbreaks, but government experts believe that the poultry imports are the “most plausible” cause of the Bernard Matthews outbreak.
Hungarian officials have started a trawl through the export papers that accompanied consignments of turkey carcasses from Bernard Matthews’ subsidiary, SaGa Foods in Sarkow, and from Gallfood in Keskemet, a plant near the infected Hungarian zone, to Suffolk between January 1 and February 1.
The authorities are also looking for possible evidence of any illicit trade, or for shoddy biosecurity that allowed infected bird faeces to travel to Britain on a lorry, a boot, a wheel arch, packaging or tool — which could have led to the spread of the virus in Suffolk.
Experts at the European Commission are to assist Britain and Hungary in determining the route of the avian flu strain that has killed at least 166 people worldwide since 2003 — when it first appeared in Asian poultry.
Raw meat that was sent to Hungary from Bernard Matthews since the bird flu was confirmed on February 3 is also to be tested for the virus. The meat had been kept in cold storage and was not being allowed into the food chain until further checks were made, Hungarian sources said yesterday.
Despite the mystery over the virus transmission and biosecurity lapses on the farm, Bernard Matthews has been given approval to resume exports to Hungary. The company, however, has decided to continue its voluntary suspension of trade with Hungary.
Problems with gulls feeding from open waste bins was first raised with Bernard Matthews management last year by its own firm of pest controllers. They had also identified holes and openings in rearing sheds that could easily allow a bird or a rodent to mix with chicks and for water or bird droppings to get into enclosed units.
Meat Hygiene Service records also reveal that inspectors issued warnings about a range of “deficiencies and noncompliance”. Though not specified, they are also related to possible breaches of animal byproduct regulations.
Bernard Matthews was served another warning last month about problems on the site. Pest control reports on January 10 and January 24 noted that gulls were carrying meat scraps half a kilometre away and then roosting on the top of the farm sheds. Poly-thene bags containing meat products and residual liquids were also thrown into the open bins and were easily blown across the site. Birds or rats may also have infected wood shavings that are stored outdoors and used to refresh bedding inside the sheds.
The virus may also have been introduced into sheds on contaminated footwear or clothing. After the disease was confirmed in turkeys in one shed it is possible that staff may have spread the disease to three other sheds on the site.
This catalogue of biosecurity failures is in stark contrast to the glowing appraisal of the company by Bernard Matthews himself. Mr Matthews spoke this week about his pride in his business, which he said had always abided by EU rules.
He denied that the company had acted evasively since the outbreak and said: “There has been absolutely no cover-up at our end. I’ve been upset about allegations that we may have withheld information. That is completely untrue.”
In a further statement the company welcomed the government report, saying it showed that the company had always acted legally.
Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat rural affairs spokesman, said: “This report high-lights serious biosecurity lapses at Bernard Matthews’ plant in Suffolk. Allowing wild birds to feed on raw poultry meat left in the open is highly irresponsible as it could lead to widespread contamination. The impression is still of an organisation in denial about the seriousness of events at its plant.”
Conservation experts are waiting to see whether the virus has spread into wild birds.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This outbreak is poetic justice for Bernard Matthews, it could be said to be 'the revenge of the turkeys' for being kept in inhumane conditions, one only has to see the instance of the employees kicking turkeys like footballs to see what the conditions are like. It was distressing to see the bird carcasses thrown into huge containers, especially as one of them was clearly alive. I realise that it is the most economic way to rear birds, but surely there is some compromise possible between economy and humanity.
jackiemiddleditch, Lowestoft Suffolk, England
You seem to assume that Times readers are only interested in the negative side of this story? The eradication programme appears to have been a total success, there is no evidence of bird flu in the local bird population and the independent Food Standards Agency has confirmed that " all food importing and processing activities being undertaken at the Bernard Matthews Factory at Holton are in line with EC law", that no meat was imported from known infected areas in Hungary entered the food chain in the UK, and its advice on the safety of the food produced is unchanged (http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2007/feb/flu16feb). The published reports clearly show that if there was a connection it occurred before the confirmation of the case in Hungary. There is no rational basis for not consuming BM products on the basis of these facts.
Paul McMullin, Thirsk, UK
As of last week, it was claimed that sales of Bernard Matthews products had decreased by 10%...10%!!! Is that all? After everything, including contradictions in information between the government and this, quite frankly bizarre company, and sales fall by 10%, I'd say that this is one of the luckiest companies around.
Rachel, Huddersfield, uk
Yes, Bernard Matthews may have been at fault and, if so, should rightly be prosecuted.
But where were all the Government inspectors who are all paid out of our taxes?... clearly they have not been doing their job properly either ... but will they be prosecuted... or even given a slap on the wrist?... any guesses?
Howard, Milton Keynes , UK
Why the heck was this organisation allowed to start businesss again under the circumstances given above!
I for one would not touch BM products with a barge pole!
Elizabeth, Cardiff, Rhondda Cynnon Taf
Well I never, How could Bernard Mathews expect customers to still buy and eat his products only two weeks after the outbreak of the bird flu virous, Its enough to put me off turkey for life, Reinstating his factory to carry on processing turkey meat is the most stupid thing ive heard,
Remember the BSE crises, we were banned from exporting for a long time after the outbreak in the UK, and I for one think this disease is just as serious.
James Adams, Huntingdon Cambs, UK
Will there be any ten for the price of one offers available does anyone know ? Could stock up for the year if the old freezer was a bit bigger.
mike, lincolnshire, u.k.
I am certain we are all totally re-assured that a man with such a wealth of experience as Mr Milliband is in charge of this potential life threatening problem
johng, Nairn, Scotland
Not much of a life for the turkeys, either!!!!
sidiam, ??, Holland
I think Bernard Matthews represents the irresponsible face of companies supplying food. More and more people are turning away from these high polluting, high volume cheap food companies led by mass profits because the Government and the law is not doing its job. People have no faith in the Food Standards Agency or the Government support for genetically modified foods because time and time again, intensive agriculture proves to be destructive.
I have suffered from bowel problems since being a sewage leak resulted in me drinking infected water. Little or no action was taken against Thames Water and I am still suffering. Companies are polluting more and more and the fines certainly do not represent the harm they cause. I would never trust big companies or the Government to ensure my safety again.
Hu, London,