Rosemary Bennett, Social Affairs Correspondent
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
Private midwives may be forced out of business next year when changes to the medical insurance rules come into effect.
The Government has given notice that all health practitioners will be required to carry professional indemnity insurance after problems with an underinsured orthodontist.
Private midwives have been without indemnity insurance since 2002, when the last company willing to provide cover pulled out. Despite this, their numbers have grown from about 40 in 2002 to 200 at present, with up to 4,000 babies a year delivered privately.
At the same time the NHS has struggled with an acute shortage of midwives. A government promise of one-to-one care with one midwife and the choice of a home birth has not materialised in many parts of the country.
A recent official report found that 18,000 mothers suffered severe complications during NHS deliveries since 2004. Negligence payouts over NHS deliveries have also soared, with £2 billion worth made since 1995 and half of those made in the past five years.
Annie Francis, spokeswoman for the Independent Midwives’ Association, said: “If the Government decides that private midwives cannot be exempt from this new law, or will not help us to find a company to insure us at a rate that midwives can afford, we will not longer be able to offer care to . . . mothers.”
Independent midwives tell mothers-to-be verbally and in writing at the first meeting that they are not covered for claims. “Most clients understand you can’t insure against things going wrong during childbirth, only against negligence, and negli- gence is not really an issue for us,” she said. The last major lawsuits against private midwives followed the birth in 1994 of two babies with cerebral palsy.
Sian Doyle, 35, who gave birth twice on the NHS before turning private for her last child, said that she had been concerned about the absence of indemnity insurance. “I am a professional negligence lawyer so for me the absence of indemnity went against the grain . . . I decided if something tragic happened, money would not soften the blow. And in any case, I had total trust in my midwife.”
She said that the standard of care she received was far higher than what she got on the NHS, where she was pressured into having her babies induced when ten days overdue. “In terms of midwives, it was totally arbitrary — a case of whoever happens to be around on the day — and in terms of postnatal care, both hospitals were utterly hopeless,” she said.
She is horrified private midwives could soon be driven out of business. “If these dedicated women are robbed of the chance of offering this service it would be terrible. Why take this choice away from women when there is no alternative?”
Ms Francis said that private midwives would like to practise under the umbrella of the NHS. She said: “They are mostly former NHS midwives who have left because of frustrations with the workload and disjointed care they were forced to offer. Many would still like to work in the NHS but feel they cannot practice what they have been trained to do there.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Women deserve to have the choice to have better care than what the system offers. Women deserve to experience natural birth in a non medicalised environment (home), without being rushed on a schedule. In Cornwall we have no independent midwives, but we are blessed with experienced and dedicated NHS community midwives who are very pro homebirth and work extremely hard under an incredible amount of pressure(extreme staff shortages here). I had my baby girl at home with their support (Pool Health Centre) and it was a wonderful drug free natural experience which I found to be so empowering. I wish every woman could have such an experience. It was so great to look forward to giving birth rather than fearing it. Please support our midwives, independent or NHS, we need them so desperately!!
Maryelen, Bolenowe, Cornwall
I had three wonderful home births with independent midwives. I am appalled that my daughter won't have the opportunity to be supported by one midwife who has got to know her throughout her pregnancy if these plans are carried out.
Insured practice does not mean safe practice. Women are interested in the quality of care they will receive, not the level of payout should negligence be proven.
If the NHS cannot provide continuity of care for women throughout each pregnancy, then the choice of IM care must remain.
Cathy, London,
I had total trust in the IM who assisted and advised me through both of my pregnancies/deliveries. These women are so passionate about their job. To be on call 24-7 you have to be. At all times I felt supported and that I was given facts and was able to make my own decisions.
Having such a wonderful experience may not be important to some women but to me - the 2 most amazing days of my life - I wanted to have control over them and do things my way.
It will be atrocious if women are not given this choice come next year. Yes, in an ideal world, insurance should be made available but I am happy with my decision as the time and energy these IM's put into each woman they care for ensures the best possible care in the UK. If things are going to go wrong, I would think that this is far more likely on the overstretched NHS.
Rachel Smith, Croydon, Surrey
I received fantastic care from my independent midwives of Yorkshire Storks and had two very gentle homebirths.
Had anything gone wrong and my baby had died or his health been compromised no amount of monetary compensation would have been any use. I chose to employ an independent midwife in full knowledge that she was uninsured. My faith in her was entirely justified.
I bet many women will now go ahead and have unassisted births if IMs are forbidden to practise rather than put themselves into the hands of the hospital system.
barbara higham, Ilkley, UK
I have run the largest private midwifery practice in the UK for 21 years. Out of those years we have been insured for 16 years and uninsured for 5 years. All insurance companies are determined to pay out nothing or as little as possible and medical insurers providing PII for midwives are no different. So they try to pay out nothing - the woman becomes more and more angry and upset, the insurer tells the midwives "Don't say sorry, don't apologize" . Finally the woman takes the midwives to court - the insurers end up paying out hundreds of thousands of pounds. The woman remains angry and traumatised. Without insurance we are in control. I go and see the woman - apologise profusely and get her to see the relevant colo-rectal surgeon. We pay for her to go to hospital and have a repair - result - healed woman pleased with our service, happy midwives and expensive case deflected - the only losers are the lawyers!
Caroline Flint, London, UK
Of course independent midwives declare to their clients regarding the lack of insurance. The work that is done is about giving a person the facts so that they have an informed choice. We are proffessionals who are trying to give women and families the oppourtunity to have the very best care, that it is possible to give. I feel that I was not able to do this in the NHS due to lack of midwives, time constraints and resources. If I could have worked the way I am working now, which is giving continuity of care and being a support, giving informed choice and being an advocate for women during their antenatal, labour, and postnatal care the way I give it now I would still be in the NHS. I feel that if left, Indepedant Midwives would be providing an additional support to the NHS and allow women to make choices after all is this not what the Goverment are advocating for women.
(proud to be a Independent Midwife and a support to women and a families choice)
Julyette, London,
As I see it having insurance does not make the birth safer for the mother or baby
and it says in the item that they discuss it with e clients verbally and it is presented in writing. Also these midwives do not want to practice without, the IndependeMidwives Associateion has worked tirelessly since 1994, when The Royal College of Midwives pulled it without warning, to set up insurance but to date none has been
found. They have not broken the law and the demand for private midwives is growing all the time. Statistically it is safer to have a baby with an independent midwife tahn in the NHS even though they tend to have more woman with high risk factors.
Elaine Batchelor, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire
I cannot believe in this day and age any professional goes out to work without insurance cover. How do they sleep at night? Do they declare it to their clients?
Elizabeth , Harrogate,
Thanks for giving this issue such thoughtful coverage. Sadly you chose the description 'private' midwife throughout - I would like to stress that most INDEPENDENT Midwives choose to work in this way because they value autonomy and want to ensure autonomy for their clients. Unlike some of our medical colleagues we don't choose this way to enhance our income. I myself have been an Independent Midwife for 7 years and I am struck by the support we are receiving from clients, ex-clients and members of the public. How we are born and how we give birth matters a great deal! It shocks me that the Government are cutting spending in the already overstretched maternity services
- we are still nearly 10 000 midwives short and seem to have no hesitation to eliminate another 200.
Elke Heckel, London,
As an independent midwife I am concerned that women will be bullied and frightened into making decisions that fit the system and not themselves if there is no other alternative to NHS midwifery care. Only 2 days ago, I supported a client who happened to have a breech baby to have a home birth. The NHS could only offer a caesarian section having failed to turn the baby. There are many other examples of clients that have booked independent care because the NHS does not always have the skill base, or confidence to support these women. The choices available to women are trivial. 'Soft furnishings, music and aromatherapy' insult women's intelligence when there are major decisions to be made. Independent midwives, if insured, could offer many services with the support of the NHS and truly offer women choices that are relevent.
Lynn G Walcott, Hemel Hempstead, England