Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor of The Times
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
What conclusions should parents draw from the research programme on the safety of mobile phones?
Proving that they are 100 per cent safe, for all time, is impossible. Nothing in life, from crossing a road to eating a bacon sandwich, can earn that grade of safety certificate.
As far as we can tell, on the experience gained so far, there is no evidence mobile phones or the masts that broadcast signals can damage anybody’s health, and that includes children.
Experience of widescale use of mobile phones is only about a decade old, however, and children have only started using them in large numbers even more recently. It remains just possible that longer-term studies will reveal some link to cancer, which takes at least a decade to manifest itself.
The odds of this are very low, because the experiments so far have shown no plausible biological mechanism by which cancer could be triggered. Radio-frequncy radiation does not damage DNA, and nor has any other effect been found that could provide such a mechanism.
The mobile phone scare has always lacked plausibility. Radio frequency signals have been around since the invention of radio - more than a century - without evidence of ill-effects among those who work closely with them.
Industrial workers usually act as the public’s canary, because their exposure to a new hazard is much more intense. There are no industrial diseases or injuries linked to radio waves - unlike, say, radioactive materials, asbestos, or some chemicals.
The mobile phones research programme has at least dispelled the myths. People who claim to be sensitive to electromagnetic fields, for example, are not. They cannot tell if the fields are switched on or off. Whatever causes their symtoms, it is not the signals from mobile phones or their base stations. Experiments that appeared to show biological effects in cells have been repeated and failed to show anything.
All that remains, like the grin of a vanishing Cheshire Cat, is the tiny hint, not reaching statistical significance, of an increased risk of some brain cancers in long-term users. This must be followed up, clearly, but for the moment there is no evidence that mobile phones pose any risks at all. While this if good news, the public had long ago made up its mind. There are now nearly as many mobile phones in use as there are people in the UK. Not much evidence there that the general public ever took the alarm very seriously.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Mobile phone communication is good for the UK economy. That is why the latest headlines grabbing studies jointly funded by the Mobile phone industry and the government concluded they are basically safe. However in order to reach that conclusion they had to sweep the results of hundreds of studies under the carpet and hope nobody noticed. They may be good for the economy but according to those hundreds of peer reviewed, published and ignored studies (including one in the papers a week or so ago) they are not good for people who use mobiles or for people forced to live near phone masts. Unfortunately Nigel Hawkes demonstrates his ignorance when he states that no other effect has been found that could provide such a mechanism (of causing DNA damage.) In February Dr George Carlo explained such mechanisms to a packed Attlee room in Westminster. I fear Mr Hawkes has been hoodwinked by the press released that come from vested interests. Please do some real research next time.
Simon Densley, London,
The Research Programme was funded in part by the mobile
Phone industry ,therefore is not indepentent, the findings should not be accepted .......a complete waste of the Tax payers money. please...please..look at the thousands of
existing independent studies showing a risk.
Derick Lattimer, Northwood, MIDDLESEX
I entirely agree. As a now retired communications systems engineer I have been working with high power and high frequency RF systems all my life, and had the responsibility for my technicians safety. Despite all the studies there has never been any demonstrable link between RF energy and cancer, especially at the extremely low power levels of mobile phones and cell phone repeaters. The problem is that most people do not understand basic physics, and the media has consistently hyped this bogeyman so that all we hear are the hysterical shrieks of the protesters. Naturally, if one tries to give a reasoned rebuttal then one is accused of attempting to cover up a conspiracy. Nevertheless, after nearly 100 years of using RF energy, common sense would indicate that we should have observed something by now if there was anything to observe. High time this spectre was laid to rest.
Adrian Ryan, Donegal, Ireland