Sarah-Kate Templeton, Health Editor
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
JUNIOR doctors will face even tougher competition for jobs this year with close to three applications expected for each position, National Health Service managers have warned.
NHS Employers, the agency responsible for staffing the health service, has warned that a Court of Appeal ruling means doctors trained in Britain will need to compete for posts to train as consultants alongside doctors from around the world who want to practise in the UK.
If the juniors do not obtain a training post, they will not be able to become hospital consultants or GPs.
Sian Thomas of NHS Employers said: “There are about 9,000 posts for around 23,000 estimated applicants - that’s what the Department of Health has told us.
“One could argue that the more competition you have, the better quality you will get. It is a good thing for patients that there is competition for jobs - it should mean they get the best doctors wherever they live.”
She admitted, however, that taxpayers’ money would be wasted if junior doctors trained in Britain decide to take consultant posts overseas.
The British Medical Association blames the health department for continuing to recruit medics from overseas at the same time as increasing the number of medical graduates from British universities.
Meanwhile, patients are suffering from a postcode lottery of drug prescription eight years after the government set up a body to get rid of the problem, a report by a parliamentary committee will say this week.
The health select committee is expected to say that the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice) has failed to ensure that medicines available in one area are not denied in neighbouring districts.
An inquiry by the committee of MPs is also expected to say that the NHS, which spends about £90 billion a year, should not need to withhold life-saving medicines. It is likely to say that restrictions on drugs to treat cancer or Alzheimer’s could be avoided. The MPs are expected to recommend that Nice gets greater powers to force NHS trusts to make drugs it has approved available to all patients.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Competition is healthy but when the competition is created by politicians to drive down salaries then it's ugly. We need MORE doctors not fewer. Politicians love to mess things around. It's the public who pay ultimately.
Dr Timothy Chan, Carmarthen, UK
Do the government realise what devastation is being caused to the lives of our future doctors by the emails landing in their in -boxes this morning? These are people with lives and families not just numbers or a resource to be allocated. Give them a system that considers their needs as well as the needs of the NHS.
Susan Regi West Sussex
Susan Regi , Shoreham by Sea, West Sussex
Why any young, intelligent British youth would choose to invest the time and energy to become a physician is beyond all reason. Go into law, business, science, or engineering. Don't blatantly throw away your life in British medicine. In the end, the NHS is going to hire all deeply discount, cheaply reimbursed physicians stolen from the third world. At the very least come to the USA, where will gladly welcome you.
Ed Sodaro MD, Massapequa, NY, USA
Another upset for junior doctors a second year in a row. The simple rule is the government does what it likes - we have seen that time and time again.
Next time "JDS" (see first comment) you go to A+E at night because you ate too many pies just think of the sacrifices these junior doctors have made in their life to end up with a huge debt, poorly paying, non training, no prospect job just to treat your reflux. The rewards just astound me!
Dr Ron Ceeder, Leicester, UK
The government has really skewed the way jobs are offered across the whole of the employement market with the introduction of the New Deal. This means that the government will pay your salary for the first year!
Junior Doctors, if you don't get offered a job in the first round, wangle your way onto "New Deal" and you'll be laughing!
Graham, St Albans, uk
To the chap form cardiff - thats just nonsense!
It is the government, not the profession who decide salaries. It may also have escaped you but the NHS is not a free market - the laws of supply and demand you describe don't exist (though the govt. looks like it wants them. Anyway even if they did they would work in the opposite direction from which you describe - having more doctors than posts available means a drop in wages as keen applicants have to accept worse pay and conditions for the same posts.
I don't know what your personal contact with the profession is, but I would like to know what you think fair recompense for highly trained individuals, who are generally the brightest and best of their generation, who work horrible unsocial hours, are met every day with hostility and abuse whilst trying to relieve suffering and cure disease, because the DoH thinks a p45 is what we need.
We arent paid what the market determines, we are paid because society values us and our skills.
Dr I Kennedy, Glasgow, UK
Isn't this just a restriction of availability of training by a profession that has an interest in keeping doctors scarce so that salaries stay high?
If training places were increased the over supply would move higher up the chain to the stage where doctors were fully qualified.
The laws of supply and demand would then apply reducing salaries and increasing hours would then be the questions, rather than pay increases and hour reductions.
Removing the profession's control over where doctors can set up surgeries and leaving a market free for all qualified Doctors would lead to a better service for patients at a lower cost for the tax payer.
There has been an over supply situation for decades which, in any other area, would havve led to a cost reduction for us.
It's time to start thinking of patients and taxpayers, not a selfish profession that thinks more of their own over luxurious lifestyles than the Deaths of those who pay the bills.
JDS, Cardiff, Wales
I'm sure Australia, NZ and the USA are rubbing their hands with glee at our bungling bureacrats. It just means they can grab out best talent without spending the £250k to train them in the first place.
Only in "great" Britain would we discriminate against out own costly trained graduates in favour of the EU and other countries. No wonder if I want to see a Doctor they rarely can speak a good level of English. But there again I guess Bottler Brown wouldn't notice. He and his family always seem to jump the queues and get the best.
Stephanie James, London, England
Aren't we still being told that we need immigrants to work in our hospitals? Surely the new 'green card' point system means foreign doctors would not be welcome under the rules as we have too many of our own dosctors to fill the available posts.
As usual, its a giant cock-up by the government that couldn't organise the proverbial brewery trip.
AndyB, Swindon,
Has the NHS gone mad. We spend milions of pounds training our Junior Doctors for them to have no chance of a job and be forced overseas to get positions, where they are greatly appreciated due to their excellent training and dedication. Meanwhile, we will be faced with a influx of Doctors from developing countries, who haven't had the benefit of our excellent training and struggle to speak English. Our Junior Doctors deserve better than this and so do we as tax payers.
j walker, Northampton,
Not ANY overseas doctor can apply - only those with Highly Skilled Migrant Permit (HSMP). To get HSMP the person involved must declare he wants to love in the UK permanently - the Home Office can quite simply refuse to offer HSMP. However through 2006 and 2007 there seemed to be no preparatory restriction on HSMP for overseas doctors who met the fairly rigorous criteria. I think that the Dept Health had very poor understanding of the technicalities of HSMP and international doctors, and just hoped that the HSMP holders would go away. In fact ironically we NEED more IMGs in some areas e.g. O and G, Paeds, Anaesthetics because of shortages in these specialties. So the 3:1 competition is almost entirely the making of the DH and Home Office. 3:1 ratio of doctors to places is not healthy at all - this means 2 entirely competent and appointable Juniors without jobs - a complete waste. And even if it were healthy the selection process would have to reliably identify the best!
Dr Gordon Caldwell, Worthing, West Sussex