Sam Coates and Jenny Booth
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona

Gordon Brown today boasted he would make health screening available to all, as he promised to reform and renew the National Health Service for the next decade.
The Prime Minister unveiled his vision for the future of the NHS, in which he said patients would take greater responsibility for monitoring their own health, for delaying the onset of illness, and for helping to direct their own treatment when they did become unwell.
He illustrated his point by describing a heart disease patient called Robbie whom he met earlier in the year, who weighed himself and took his own blood pressure and emailed the results to his GP.
The rise in patient power would be backed by a range of “private healthcare-style” screenings on offer at GP surgeries and high street health centres, intended to identify those at greatest risk of heart disease, stroke, diabetes and kidney disease, so that the conditions could be treated at the earliest opportunity, said Mr Brown.

He said that this preventative approach to health care was essential to reshape the NHS to meet the challenges of a population which was getting older and fatter, as people led longer but not healthier lives.
“The NHS of the future will do more than just treat patients who are ill – it will be an NHS offering prevention as well,” Mr Brown said in a speech to healthcare professionals at Kings College in London.
“The NHS of the future will be more than a universal service – it will be a personal service too. It will not be the NHS of the passive patient – the NHS of the future will be one of patient power, patients engaged and taking greater control over their own health and their healthcare too... over time, everyone in England will have access to the right preventative health check-up.
“And so if the NHS is to change like this - to meet the challenges of 21st century healthcare and our 21st century lives - we will have to embrace even deeper and wider reform.”
Mr Brown said there would be a focus on patients whose lifestyle choices – smoking, drinking and above all obesity – made them unwell. In a stick-and-carrot approach, patients who failed to co-operate with the NHS by failing to keep appointments would be penalised by losing their eligibility to waiting time guarantees, he added.
Sections of the community will be invited by age, gender, postcode, family history, height and weight to take part in the tests. Mr Brown will say that services such as blood, fat and sugar tests, heart monitoring and, in some cases, ultrasounds, should be available free at GP surgeries and even private clinics "when you want and need them", rather than just in hospitals.
The reforms would happen in parallel with changes to food labelling, greater access to sport and exercise, and new restrictions on advertising unhealthy foods. Social care would also be shaken up, and a green paper would be launched on how it was funded. The first screenings will be available by the end of this year as part of Mr Brown’s promise to make the NHS his highest priority. Every man reaching the age of 65 is to be offered an ultrasound test for abdominal aortic aneurysms – in which the body’s main artery becomes swollen and can rupture. An operation can correct this if it is detected early.
The Prime Minister said that the NHS would continue to fund medical advances that allow diseases to be more easily diagnosed at earlier stages. Ministers believe that the ability to intervene early will save costly treatments later when the conditions become more serious.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
But the way in which local trusts are downgading nurses, (who will have to leave to find a decent paid job), there will be very little experience out there !!!! Personally the down grading will mean that from April my pay will be £6,000 a year less than it is currently - I will be doing the same job, same experience and knowledge gained from 22years service for alot less money and Gordon expects us to stay !!!!!! DREAM ON !!!!!!
Claire , Derby , UK !!!!!!!
Gordon Brown has not mentioned how the existing services will be boosted to support the treatment of those screened who are found to have some treatable condition. Can our GPs cope? What do they think about the extra workload? What resources will be put into hospital care?
And what about the patients found to have something which may or may not require treatment - because screening always pushes at the boundaries of our existing knowledge and identifies a hinterland of patients who may need 'observation' for years?
And what does our Chief Medical Officer think? Liam Donaldson has remained strangely silent.
Shirley, London,
Why are maternity wards closing and why does it take about a week to get an appointment with your local GP?In France you can see you GP the same day.Mr Brown just diverts attention from the real issue,namely,the UK economy is in trouble.
stephen hulton, eure, france
Does anybody really believe anything this totally incompetant government promises anymore? Every picture tells a story and the faces of this bunch couldn't be more explicit in that even they don't believe that pigs will ever fly. Cameron should be climbing all over them.
Chris, Aberdeen,
Apparently this announcement was made without any consultation with the GMA and without their prior knowledge even though they had asked for discussions with the government prior to Xmas. How can Brown be taken seriously without such a consultation.
This is just another example of Brown's style, thinking he knows best ,without even bothering to consult the experts.
This is clearly just an attempt by Brown to try and relaunch his government and to make everybody forget all his governments recent incompetence.
The man is just floundering and looks more ridiculous by the day . I can remember John Major trying the same thing ,constantly trying to relaunch his failing government. The comparisons are obvious and the result will be the same.
Brown's government like Majors looks tired and clearly lacks any direction or vision.
It is very much time for a change!!!.The longer he goes on the greater will be his defeat.
eric, hull, uk
It would be better if this government concentrated on a decent long strategy for the NHS instead of constant re-organizations eg PCGs to small PCTs back to large PCTs (read old health authorities) more policy and yet more targets. The NHS hasn't got much better where I live despite all the cash. You still wait too long.
More policy doesn't lead to better services unless the policy is right and it can be implemented over a sensible time frame. Haven't we been here before - remember Choosing Health, wonder what happened to that?
Angela, Durham, Durham
I am so tired of empty rhetoric. Unfortunately the downside of our £70 billion health budget appears to be that the private sector gets to write DoH policy - just as the National Programme for IT in the NHS (another £20 billion) seems to have been based on a powerpoint presentation to Mr.Blair one afternoon a few years ago. 'You get what you pay for' used to be the old adage. Now you'll get what's left over after the private sector have been at the trough.
All health professionals are loathed by the civil service because they feel they cannot control them properly. The 'reforms' (HA!) of the last 5 years have been designed to completely disempower them resulting in low morale & complete disenchantment. The DoH has calculated that they can live with this because the private sector will step in & just take over. I'm not so sure they can provide the range & depth of service required, but time will tell
Jonathan, Bath, UK
This government has just reduced spending on Cardiac and Renal units. Where will the money and manpower come from?
Even if wea re all scanned, those of us with problems will not get treated because the national institure for clinical Excellence will not fund the cost of the medicines needed. this new "vision" will like other announcements will be quietly dropped until another soundbite is found to bolster the Prime Minister's flagging popularity. Lets have a vote so that we can have an elected prime minister.
G P Coombe, Winkleigh , England (in a hell of a state)
To Sandra's comment - why is so much money put into general practice? The simple fact is that 80% of the NHS work load is carried out in primary care- roughly 260 million consultations a year. Would you like millions of these consultations to take place in hospitals- they would be over run- and the people that actually need acute care would be marginalised by the worried well. I am sorry your experiences have been so bad with your GP. I work 110% for my patients- I always have and always will - I believe many improvements are needed but I still believe in primary care despite the proganda spued by the daily mail and such like that you so obviously support.
PS before you say it. I dont earn £100,000 (I wish) and I do work weekends and evenings.
Dr Patel, London,
Didn't he promise us that he would make sure that everyone would have access to an NHS dentist?. At his last attempt of all curing reform 50,000 people in Leeds lost their NHS dentist.
Pray tell, how is this going to be achieved by cutting NHS training posts from 15,500 to 9,000 and driving two thirds of trainee doctors abroad in search of work?.
No! this is just another piece of fanciful hype, where Mcbean makes a lot of promises, hopes we will believe him, then goes away and does his usual nothing.
john, Leeds,
So that's it?
Global economic problems, oil $100 a barrel, Iraq / Iran, War on Terror, and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom goes on prime time TV and radio to announce.......health screening for the over 65s.
MarkS, Leeds,
There is very little evidence that "Health Screening" makes the slightest difference to health outcomes. Various programes, such as over "75 year old screening" and much child health surveillance have been abandoned over the years because they gave little benefit for much time spent. Whilst a "check up" from the doctor may make a patient feel that they are in good health, this is often false reassurance and a licence to avoid important lifestyle modifications that would have a significant impact on long term health. This is another example of politicians meddling in areas that they are poorly qualified in order to woo the populist vote.
It is time to remove the NHS from political control and allow clinicians to alocate resources on the basis of clinical need rather that political expediency.
Dr Richard Weekes, Ullapool, Scotland
I'm counting to see how many hours it takes for GP representatives to say 'where's all the extra money we will need to provide these extra services?'. They'll conveniently forget their 30% pay rise a short time ago for less work and estimated average pay packet of 110k. I went to see my GP a couple of weeks ago with a problem with my shoulder. At the end of my consultation my GP asked me whether I kept an eye on my weight. Yes, I said, I'm more or less the exact recommended weight for my height. Confused by this apparently totally irrelevant question, it was only later that I realised that probably a tick in a box to the effect that my GP had considered my weight and lifestyle issues meant more (unearned) taxpayers' money for the practice. I just hope that the overseas drs who can now comptete equally with home grown ones for jobs bring with them a bit more ethical awareness than the money obsessed ones we're currently stuck with.
Clive, Chichester, UK
Screening is not prevention!!!
My father had tests on his heart carried out and was given the all clear, two week slater he dies of a heart attack!
Martin, Nottingham,
The most effective thing that Brown and Co could do for the NHS is to just leave the darn thing alone...
Phil C - heard that before but it was Gordon Brown and Bankers!
DickW, Aberdeenshire, Scotland
As a Practice Manager in a busy GP Practice for the last 10 years I would like to say this is something we have already being doing i.e. providing primary care, promoting preventative medicine. As Gordon Brown signals the green light for supermarket to provide GP surgeries, it is those very same supermarkets that are making our population obese and hypertensive through thier promotions. Please let the doctors make the decisions instead of vowing to punish us if we do not perform. After all we are not God, but always try to do our best. God save this country!!!
William Smith, London,
There will be a twist in this. We know very well that Bean doesn't trust the people one inch- probably he's right as he knows that the people loathe him and would overthrow him tomorrow given half a chance- and that as our all-knowing; all-seeing master he knows all the solutions much better than anyone else. With Brown's announcements there are always the good sounding bits in the first spin- the real bad news - the sting in the tail - comes later . Let's see what it is this time.
Doug, Glasgow,
This seems like a good way to get everyones DNA on file. Me suspiscious, never.
Cromwell, Leeds, ENGLAND
Oh Mr Brown aren't you wonderful, after having our health screening, we will all know whats wrong with us and we will be told about the all the advanced medications that the NHS will not pay for because the efficacy of medication is still being assessed by the NHS.
After it has been proved beyond by all reasonable doubt that new treatments work, NICE will turn around and say we do not believe that the benefits of this medication justify the price being charged by pharmaceutical companies.
Mr Brown please do something useful, support the Legislation that the EU trying to introduce, which will enable NHS patients to be treated in Europe rather than being patronised in their own country.
Everyone is fed up with political spin, cancer patients just want to be treated with the best drugs and given prompt radiotherapy etc which still isn't happening here.
People are having to demonstrate to get access to drugs that cost just a few pounds per day!
You sound pathetic Mr Brown.
Graham Wharton, St Albans, uk
How much longer are we going to be conned with this mythical idea of patient choice! As always unless you have money and are mobile enough to travel somewhere else where things are better, your choices are substantially limited. Why keep pouring resources into GP's practices? GP's work less hours than before and as a patient I have less confidence in their expertise and specialist skills than staff in hospitals. Yet this Government persists with this notion of pouring resources, with lots of strings to create GP super practices. It's a nightmare trying to get an appointment with my GP now with existing services, so what will adding more services to these practices do to help? What about turning the tide and putting the pride and support back into the grossly undervalued hospitals at the heart of our communities with resources, like scanners that will be underused if these new policies are implmented.
Sandra, Exeter, UK
I don't want to hear anything from President Brown when we we already have highly paid ministers who are supposed to be doing the job. The Secretary of State for Health should be announcing this. Evidently Brown no longer trusts his own cabinet henchmen and henchwimmin with important policy pronouncements.
Gordon Alexander, Frome, UK
I suspect that behind the promise of health monitoring programs lies the threat that if we do not act on doctors' warnings to change our lifestyle then we will no longer be entitled to free treatment.
It would tie in with last week's warnings to smokers and the obese.
There is much detail waiting to be heard. We all very well know from his previous Budget statements that Brown only picks out the favourable headings and leaves the unfavourable details to be picked over and released bit part by the media as they read the small print.
Edwin, Bucharest,
More of the usual spin. What's the point of more choice when it takes months to see specialists and when you finally get into hospital you end up with MRSA? I would really like to know how much of the taxes I have paid in the last 10 years have gone to the NHS and how much of that money has been wasted!
Latest joke....what's the difference between Estate Agents and Gordon Brown? Estate agents are only hated by 99% of the population and know when to quit!
Phil C, London, UK
I think it should really be seen as extraordinary that such decisions are made and announced by politicians instead of by professionals within the NHS.
Nigel, London,
We don't want more power or choices when we're ill Gordon. Patient power and choices are just political gimmicks to cover up incompetence and inefficiency. What we want is the local hospital to do a good job. Simple as that.
Ian , Benfleet, UK