Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor
Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live

More than 40 hospitals risk failing a new registration test unless they improve hygiene standards in the next 10 months.
When the new Care Quality Commission comes into operation in April 2009, it will impose minimum standards that all hospitals must achieve in order to be allowed to treat patients.
Figures published today by the Healthcare Commission show that more than 100 NHS trusts - including 41 hospitals - admit failing to meet at least one of these hygiene standards in the year up to March 31.
Until now, this has been a black mark and has affected their position in the commission’s annual ratings. But, after next April, it could in principle prevent a hospital operating at all.
“These trusts risk not being registered in April 2009,” said Anna Walker, chief executive of the commission. “They need to improve to meet the hygiene code as it moves to becoming a requirement.
“In practice, it’s unlikely to mean they won’t be allowed to operate. It is possible for them to be registered with conditions. But these conditions will be made public."
She said it would be a “real failure” if any trust was unable to register with the new regulator because it could not meet standards on hygiene.
“What we are saying is this is a wake-up call,” she said. “It’s 10 months before this formal registration.”
Today’s figures, which are the trusts’ own self-assessments of whether they met the standards, show a small improvement on most measures when compared to last year’s, but many admit they did not meet them all.
More than a quarter (26 per cent) declared non-compliance with one or more aspects of the hygiene code, compared to 25 per cent in 2006-07. In part, said Ms Walker, this was because in some respects the standards had been clarified and toughened, so that trusts realised they were not meeting them, and admitted so.
Thirty-five trusts could not say they complied with standards on infection control, 70 could not meet requirements on decontaminating equipment and 21 could not hit targets on hygiene control and the upkeep of buildings.
Overall, just 39.4 per cent of trusts (154 out of 391) could say they met 100 per cent of the Government’s requirements for the NHS, down slightly on the 40.1 per cent figure for the year before.
Primary Care Trusts, which run community hospitals and provide nurses and health visitors, did especially poorly, with 37 per cent failing to meet compliance with one or more aspects of the hygiene code.
Among acute trusts (hospitals), 91 per cent said they complied with the standard on infection control, and 92 per cent with that on cleanliness, but fewer (86 per cent) met the standard on decontaminating instruments safely.
This was a sharp drop compared with 2006-07, largely because the commission has spelt out more clearly what needs to be done to meet this standard. The use of bench-top sterilisers, for example, is not prohibited but is frowned upon as unsafe, and during the year two trusts were issued with improvement notices relating to this.
The data released today is the trusts’ own assessment of how well they have done. The commission will audit them by inspecting 20 per cent of trusts - 12.5 per cent where its own information and data suggests that particular trusts may be exaggerating, and another 7.5 per cent chosen at random just to keep the NHS on its toes.
Last year these inspections did lead to downgrading of nine hospital trusts and four primary care trusts who were found not to have met standards they claimed to have met.
Three failed the standard on decontamination: Torbay Care Trust, Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, and West Kent Primary Care Trust.
Two more failed on cleanliness: Southend University Hospital and University Hospital of North Staffordshire; and two on patient privacy and confidentiality: West Hertfordshire Hospital and Weston Area Health NHS Trust.
Ben Bradshaw, the Health Minister, said: “We welcome this year’s findings, which show a dramatic fall in the number of trusts that are reporting serious non-compliance from 15 to four. This improvement is a great tribute to the hard work of NHS staff.
“We are also pleased that infection control is showing significant improvement - reflecting the importance both the Government and public place on this.”
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Have you not seen nurses leaving the hospital with their uniforms on. No doubt they drive their car home, do some house work, cook clean up the kitchen all with the uniform on, then to bed, and in the morning off to work wearing the same uniform. Where is the hygiene?
victor arram, westcliff,
The leaders of the Health Care Commission should know the reality of the health service well enough not to make such silly threats. Hygiene standards are a management problem and should be dealt with accordingly, Poor hygiene may put patient's lives at risk, closing hospitals certainly will.
Kent, Bath, Somerset
Will there be hefty closure on chief executive team salary at the same time as the out of control 'hot bedding' fall out causes this closure.Surely more hospitals/units,more medical staff,double the cleaning man power,and also a real hunt for those PCT's who specialise in dangerous complaint cover.
mary foord brown, suffolk coastal,
What a wonderful idea! We dont have enough hospitals as it is and this bunch want to close more of them! Whats wrong with getting a grip on hygiene in these places? Cleaners who actually clean would be a good start!
Carol Asacret, Cambridge, England
How stupid. How can you just close a hospital. More..more and even more training. Do not employ outside services. All staff must be employed by the hospital, not from outside.
victor arram, westcliff,
Closing Hospitals and also schools are a ruse to pave
the eay to privatise these institutions.
PKenny, Bradford, West Yorkshire
what all are we going to close. are we going to shut down an under achieving government. are we closing under achieving ministeries.or only less staffed,over working hospitals to save money or post offices,schools and at last police stations too because of the rise in crime. stop blame game!!!!
jose, redhill, uk
That's it ithen. We will all have to go to France if we need hospital treatment. And what about the staff? Perhaps they should go to, I feel they would enjoy the break from the stress of macro-mismanagment, and statistical reporting over patient care.
Jennifer Hynes, Plymouth, England
There needs to be return to basic rules and standards:
1) Limit on numbers of visitors
2) No children under five allowed at all - like it used to be
3) No visiting during meal times
4) No sitting or lying on patients beds by relatives/kids
5) No handling of newborns at all by visitors
wendy, belfast, northern ireland
Unclean hospitals to close - underachieving schools to close - what next? Is this the way we deal with things that aren't up to standard - we just shut it down. Why not invest more resources- better training - more staff. No its easier to just lay blame and shut it down.
Dizz, Chichester,
We already have the prospect of poor schools being 'closed' down now the same threat to unhygienic hospitals. In both cases it is the quaility of the management and staff that is at fault. Perhaps this aspect should be tackled first, instead of just moving the problem staff to other school/hospitals
PR, Croydon, UK
This is a preposterous proposition! Having concentrated several hospitals in Huddersfield [only to use this an example,] if the HRI were condemened to closure, where would all the patients go to? Hull, Halifax or HELL? Same goes in any town nowadays. Create 'centres of excellence' then shut them?
S. Barraclough, Huddersfield, W. Yorkshire