Mark Henderson, Science Editor
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
The world’s first robotic twitcher has been deployed to one of America’s most inhospitable swamps to join the search for the holy grail of birdwatching: an iconic woodpecker so rare that it was thought to be extinct for more than half a century.
The ivory-billed woodpecker, sometimes known as the Lord God bird because of its spectacular plumage, had last been spotted in 1944 before a possible sighting of a bird with its markings was reported in the Cache River national wildlife reserve, in Arkansas, in February 2004.
A fleeting image of the bird was then captured on video, and ornithologists recorded its characteristic drumming sounds, prompting Frank Gill, of the Audubon Society, the leading American bird conservation group, to declare its rediscovery to be “kind of like finding Elvis.”
However, the ivory bill’s survival has been disputed by sceptics, who argue that the bird in the video could be another bird, the pileated woodpecker.
The continuing controversy has prompted scientists to turn to new robotic technology in an effort to capture evidence: a high-resolution film of the Lord God bird in full flight.
“The problem with field biology is that it is very inefficient,” said Ken Goldberg, of the University of California, Berkeley, who led the team that designed the robot birdwatcher. “You have to go somewhere remote, sit for long periods in the cold, it is lonely, costly, and it can be downright dangerous. The presence of a researcher can also affect the presence of the species you are trying to help.
“Robots can help by watching right through the mosquito season and the snake season, if they can be made smart enough to make decisions and process data in real time.”
His colleague, Dezhen Song, of Texas A&M University, said: “Usually people do this type of bird watching in the winter because there are fewer leaves, making it easier to spot the woodpecker. Also, in the summer, the temperature is hot, it’s swampy, and there are mosquitoes and snakes to deal with. Our [robotic] system can run the whole year, and it is not bothered by mosquitoes.”
The robot is a sophisticated pair of smart video cameras, which point skyward, east and west, in the Big Woods region of Arkansas where it is hoped that the ivory bill survives. The cameras have software that activates only when the view overhead changes in a way that might be consistent with a bird in flight.
The system is designed to filter out false positives from clouds, water reflections and falling leaves. “The program knows, for example, that the ivory-billed woodpecker flies 20 to 40 miles per hour, so anything outside that range is deleted,” Dr Song said.
Each camera records eleven frames per second, each with a resolution of two megapixels, so any image should be sharp enough to allow scientists to make a conclusive identification should an ivory bill fly overhead. While the elusive woodpecker has yet to be seen, the cameras have already picked up several good images of other birds — a redtailed hawk, a flock of Canada geese, and a blue heron — which were shown yesterday for the first time at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in San Francisco.
Ron Rohrbaugh, of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, a member of the scientific team searching for the woodpecker, said that the robot was a valuable asset. “There are other ways of searching for the ivory-billed woodpecker, but those ways usually involve a human positioned in the forest for a very long time,” he said.
“Remote systems that can serve as our eyes and ears are a big advantage.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Why do supposedly educated people not take the word of local people? If a robot takes a photo of a bird, who pays for the cost of the robot and the photo? Do our universities have money to spend on such things?
Ginny Ruppe, Owatonna,
"The Lord God BIRD" is a NICKNAME for the bird. A quick google search makes that obvious.
Deb, Rohnert Park,
The debate over the supposed extinction of this bird has been going on for over 50 years with the "experts" on one side and locals from Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana reporting occasional sightings. Growing up near the Big Thicket area of east Texas, I saw pileated woodpeckers almost daily - but no one was willing to believe a reported sighting of a similar but distinctively different species. The "experts" knew better. I'm hoping a few of these experts will soon be eating crow.
Roger Hebert, Austin, Texas
I am amazed, I love to see technology used so positively. However I am a bit perplexed at one of the peole who commented.
"The story would be enhanced with an image of the Lord God." I haven't ever seen a picture of God in my life, as there are none. Cameras were not around in Jesus's time, and i know he certainly didn't pose for any artists in his time.
So why would that even be relevant to the article?
Kurt D Iobst, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania
Why would I be interested in the comments/opinions of people who lack basic spelling and grammar skills? Read the story, reflect on what it says, and then... do not write a comment!
As for the story: work like this is what makes me feel good to be human. This is exactly what we should be doing with our money and time, not inventing new and "better" cell phone technology, or (like the Japs) making robots that dance and sing or greet us at the doors to museums. A robot that finds rare animals? Excellent. A robot that cleans my house? Pathetic.
George Hayduke, New Prospect,
Hope the adventure is successful. Its nice to see stories of life when the headlines show so much carnage. The story would be enhanced with an image of the Lord God.
Rohan Bell, Kingston, Jamaica
All the above stated problems, of recording a rare bird, also apply to the elusive Bigfoot of course. Which is often overlooked by sceptics and scientists alike, as they dismiss Bigfoots existence, as,, Naah! Couldn't be!.
Michael Bird, Birmingham, England
isnt tecnology wonderful,
With all the terrable things going on in the world, its nice to know there are people out there that care enought to make a differance. Just fantastic.
andrew bailey, newcastle upon tyne, tyne and wear
ah think the wwodsy pecker is losey goosey
Franklin St. Pierre, Dracula, MO,
Huh huh wood pecker huh huh.
Bill Tomson, Brownville, USA/CA
And what if the bird is flying far overhead (so it looks very slow to the camera, i.e. below 20mph), or very low (so it looks very fast)? And two megapixels is barely enough for even family photos, much less distance identification...
Jester2138, New Orleans,