Jonathan Leake Science Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
AFTER more than 90 years, scientists believe they may have found experimental proof for general relativity, one of Albert Einstein’s greatest theories.
Scientists announced yesterday that early results from Gravity Probe B (GP-B), the £400m space mission carrying the first experiments capable of testing the theory, suggested that Einstein was right.
The researchers cautioned that they still had several months of work to confirm the result. However, the announcement, made at the annual meeting of the American Physical Society, is seen as highly significant.
Since its launch by Nasa in April 2004, GP-B has been using four ultra-precise gyroscopes to measure two effects predicted by Einstein’s theory. One is the “geodetic” effect, the amount by which the Earth warps space and time. The other, called frame-dragging, measures how the Earth “twists” space as it spins.
Both effects were predicted by Einstein in 1905 but are so tiny that only recently has it become possible to measure them.
Professor Francis Everitt, a Stanford University physicist and principal investigator of the GP-B mission, said the gyroscope data confirmed the predicted geodetic effect to a precision of better than 1%.
“It’s fascinating to be able to watch the Einstein warping of space-time in the tilting of these gyroscopes,” said Everitt.
However, the frame-dragging effect, which is more interesting to scientists, is 170 times smaller than the geodetic effect and Stanford scientists are still trying to filter out the relevant information from the mass of data sent back by the spacecraft.
“We anticipate it will take about eight more months of detailed data analysis,” said William Bencze, GP-B programme manager. “Understanding this data is like an archeological dig. A scientist starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, and then finally uses dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust from the treasure. We are passing out the toothbrushes now.”
Einstein’s theories of special and general relativity are among the greatest achievements of 20th-century physics.
Special relativity explained how space and time are linked and showed that nothing could travel faster than the speed of light. This is easy for scientists to verify experimentally in particle accelerators.
However, this left Einstein with a problem: how to explain gravity? It appeared to behave like a force that was transmitted instantly over vast distances, but this was impossible if nothing could travel faster than light.
In 1916 Einstein came up with general relativity, which reinterpreted gravity not as a force but as a “field” generated by objects such as planets and which distorted nearby space according to the mass of that object.
However, general relativity has many weaknesses. One is that it seems incompatible with quantum mechanics, the theory that addresses how matter behaves at sub-atomic levels. Another is that it has proven impossible to find a way of verifying it experimentally.
It was these problems that led researchers to design GP-B to find out if Einstein’s theory needed amending or replacing. The craft was first proposed in 1959 but it has taken more than 40 years to bring the project to fruition.
At the heart of GP-B is the most precise gyroscope ever made. Once a gyroscope is pointed in a certain direction and set spinning, it should hold that alignment for ever. If Einstein were right, however, the distortion of space caused by the nearby Earth should slowly bring such a gyroscope out of alignment through a combination of the geodetic and frame-dragging effects.
Such effects are very small. According to Everitt, over the course of a year the geodetic effect caused the gyroscopes to change alignment by just 0.0018 degrees.
The frame-dragging effect is predicted to change the gyroscope’s alignment by about 0.000011 degrees. This is the width of a human hair viewed from a quarter of a mile away.
Dr Clive Speake, an experimental gravity researcher at Birmingham University, said the most interesting results on the frame-dragging effects were yet to come. “If the probe can measure how the spin of the Earth has affected the spin of the gyroscopes to the accuracy they claim, it would be the strongest test yet devised for general relativity,” he said. “We shall have to wait a few more months.”

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Einstein Theory has been propagated to an extent that it has become a shackle to new thoughts on how the universe evolved and what are the basics of physical science. Anyone who dares to challenged is collectively labelled a nincompoop. Even Einstein did not understand what he meant by his theory, it was just a thought process blown into a mega portions, till we do not stop measuring all new discoveries against this unproven thought of a mediocre scientist we will never progress in learning more about the Cosmos.
Khalid Mian, London, UK
Dear Editor of the Sunday Times, your Science Editor appears to be unaware that astronomers have been collecting experimental proof for GR for almost a century. Just ask him to take a look at the
Wikipedia -- or even read a book on GR.
In spite of the Science Editor, congrats and encouragement to the
GP-B guys!
A mere illiterate physicist, Hamburg., Germany
The second paragraph of this article is
is erroneous and misieading.
It states that GPB is the first experiment
capable of testing General Relativity. Since its
inception there have been countless
experimenst confirming its predictions
which are fully documented in all textbooks on the subject.
GPB is posibly the first, and this is disputed in the field,
to attempt to check a very particular effect
which is believed by some to have already been measured. In fact there exist experiments confirming
General Relativity to greater precision than GPB will
be able to achieve if it is sucessful. In this respect I
disagree with Dr Speake but he obviously implies
that there are other tests. This makes the article
not only erroneous and misleading but internally inconsistent. The slip could have been spotted by someone with no scienific training, just common sense.
G W Gibbons, Cambridge, UK