Mark Henderson Science Editor
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
A great mind does not always make for a great bank balance, according to research that suggests the richest people are no cleverer than the rest of us.
Scientists in the United States have found that while average incomes tend to increase with IQ scores, intelligence has very little to do with absolute wealth.
A high IQ also offers no protection against falling into heavy debt or other kinds of financial mismanagement. The very brightest are more likely to have money problems than those who are slightly above average intelligence.
The findings, from a team at Ohio State University, could reflect the way in which many of the most impressive fortunes are not amassed through steady accumulation of high salaries, but by other means that are not influenced heavily by academic intelligence.
Most of the richest people in Britain, for example, are not salaried, but rather have amassed their fortunes as entrepreneurs or by inheritance.
The research, led by Jay Zagorsky, has not yet examined in detail why IQ seems to be linked to income but not to wealth, but early indications suggest that differences in saving may be part of the answer. “People don’t become rich just because they are smart,” Dr Zagorsky said. “Your IQ has really no relationship to your wealth. And being very smart does not protect you from getting into financial difficulty.”
In the study, published in the journal Intelligence, Dr Zagorsky examined detailed data from 7,403 Americans who had been interviewed repeatedly since 1979. IQ scores were compared with income and overall wealth, and participants were asked whether they had ever reached their limit on a credit card, been declared bankrupt or missed paying bills for financial reasons.
It found that IQ was strongly linked to income, with each extra point of IQ worth between $202 (£101) and $616 (£308) a year. The average annual income difference between a person with a normal IQ, of 100, and a person in the top 2 per cent, with an IQ of 130, was between $6,000 (£3,000) and $18,500 (£9,250).
Overall wealth, however, was not correlated strongly with IQ, and there were mixed results regarding financial problems. While people with low IQs were the most likely to have reached their limit on credit cards, those with very high IQs were more likely to have had financial difficulties than those with slightly above-average intelligence.
“In these measures of financial difficulties, it seems that those of slightly better-than-average intelligence are best off,” Dr Zagorsky said.
“Just because you’re smart doesn’t mean you don’t get into trouble. Among the smartest people, those with IQ scores above 125, even 6 per cent of them have maxed out their credit cards and 11 per cent occasionally miss payments.
“Financial success for most people means more than just income. You need to build up wealth to help buffer life’s storms and to prepare for retirement. You also shouldn’t have to worry about being close to or beyond your financial limits.”
He said that the tendency of university academics not to be rich reflected that wealth was poorly linked to IQ.
“Professors tend to be very smart people,” he said. “But if you look at university parking lots, you don’t see a lot of Rolls-Royces, Porsches or other very expensive cars.
“Those with low intelligence should not believe they are handicapped, and those with high intelligence should not believe they have an advantage.”
Schooled in wealth
Duke of Westminster inherited a property empire but left Harrow with one O level. Failed Sandhurst exam and went on to command the Territorial Army
Sir Richard Branson Virgin founder left school at 15. Now has a fortune of £3 billion
Sir Alan Sugar Amstrad entrepreneur left Brooke House School in East London aged 16 to set up his first company, selling car aerials from the back of a van
Sir Philip Green Retail tycoon left school without qualifications aged 15. Is now worth an estimated £3.6 billion
Prince of Wales attended Trinity College, Cambridge, with a relatively meagre two A levels in 1967
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I'd have to agree that having brains doesn't necessarily mean that you will be wealthy. People with brains obviously don't see the world the same way as the general population. The value system is different. You need money to survive but beyond that greed is a monster that is never satisfied and you would think that most smart people would know this.
I find that people that value money and nothing else are quite shallow and there is no depth to their personality.
I am not wealthy at the present time but if I was I think I would use what I need to survive comfortably and give the rest away to charities. There is only so much money that you can spend and you can't take it with you when you die.
Linda, Edmonton, Canada
It could be that academics are aware of how pointless it is to spend a lot of money on unnecessary/extravagant material possessions. Also, academics may also not be overly motivated to make millions, - if one has a 'high enough' IQ, surely one realises that making buckets of money is not the meaning of life, the be all and end all of existence?
How is it clever to trade your soul/life for the big buck...
Is not one of the main problems of society that people put too much value on material possessions and external beauty, and not enough emphasis on inner beauty and spiritual growth and goodness?.....
who cares what car you drive, how big your house/chest size is, and what brand your watch is,....are you a good person?
Does anyone share this point of view?
JK, London,
Academics are usually not rich because they don't particularly want to be, not because they can't work out how to do it. Their currency of success is different. I've worked in business and academia. Academia is less well paid but - to those who do it - much more interesting, and with the possibility that you are doing something that advances human frontiers. That, not money, is the main compensation. Good luck to entrepreneurs, they enrich life in more ways than one, but a civilisation is better off when making money is not the only goal.
IQ is a strange concept in any case. I could devise a very precise set of measures that predictably gave your body a single number - a 'BQ' score. It would be very rigorous. And you would rightly say a single number to describe something as complex as a human physique was silly. How on earth can a single number say anything useful about something as complex as the human brain? As this article in its way demonstrates.
david, Oslo,
IQ tests measure your ability to do IQ tests. Your ability to solve problems can also be measured by them but little else. I have an IQ variously measured from as low as 161 to as high as 183. I am not rich, I am disabled - but I am happy.
I could apply for mensa but most of the people I know in that organisation are far from happy. I have applied my intelligence to being happy within my parameters. I may lack the endless drive of the Bransons and Sugars of this world but I feel I have realised my risk exposure and by reducing this I have made myself happy - what more can any of us really hope for?
adrian, Lancashire,
Hilarious. I was at Oxford, where many of my co-students had IQs that wouldn't fit in a 40 ton truck. Some of them could barely tie their shoelaces, and were utterly socially disfunctional. Their only chance of a job? At Oxford!
This is witless research. Anyone with half a brain would know that IQ does NOT = Intelligence.
Jeremy Poynton, Fromeville, 51st State
Can't believe I just read this. I've read about many flawed academic studies in my life but trying to find a correlation between IQ and inherited wealth possibly comes out on top as the most daft.
As for what the results of the study actually say, it is neither surprising nor of any interest. It merely says that the very smartest people are not wealthier than people who are just very smart (and quietly notes that the very smart are still much wealthier than the "normal" or "not-so-smart")
Maybe this is because the smartest people in the world are academics and not entrepreneurs? Is there any particular reason Stephen Hawking, as opposed to Branson, would be rich(Even excusing the foolish assumption that people who drop out of school cannot be clever)? This study is not ground-breaking at all and only notes that geniuses are not neceassarily going to be millionaires. It does not say that Jade Goody was destined to get her millions.
Abioye A Oyetunji, London, UK
I agree, there is great book called 'Rich Dad, Poor Dad' and it points out that we are never taught financial responsibility at school. We then suddebly have loans and credit cards thrown at us when we go to University. Sir Branson, Sir Sugar and Sir Green all left school early and learn't those lessons before any of us. I wish the concepts of Capital, income and savings were taught at an earlier stage, it would prepare us for the real challenges of life.
Ravi Kohli, Nairobi, Kenya
When are people going to notice that having a high IQ doesn't mean that you are intelligent - it means you can problem solve in very specific situations. People who are very good at this when they are given IQ tests (which consist of lists of one problem at a time), aren't necessarily good at real life situations which have a far wider range of challenges and options and in which the right answer is not always the logical one.
You can't compare IQ tests and academic achievements - they test totally different things. And you can't base a judgement of someone's "intelligence" solely on either one
Hannah, Leamington, UK
This artical brings to my mind questions about the links between public education & wealth, or maybe public education & intelligence. Even the most intelligent people can get into financial trouble when their education fails to prepare them for the responsibilities of independent adulthood.
As for Sir Richard Branson & company, perhaps dropping out of a generic system of education to persue eduation & experience on one's own path towards individual goals in life is a sign of great intelligence & the best way to achieve the financial (& spiritual) independence that is true wealth.
Tommy, Lynchburg, Virginia, U.S.