Lewis Smith: Science Reporter
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Having a brother or sister can stunt growth, but it is the youngest siblings that are the worst affected, research suggests.
Analysis of children born in the 1990s showed that children with three siblings were 2.5 centimetres (one inch) shorter than the average height for their age. The lost height for older siblings was shown to be temporary but there were long-lasting impacts for the youngest children.
Growth rates for children are considered to be a good indicator of future health. On the basis of the study, the researchers said that the health of the youngest siblings could be compromised in adulthood.
Presenting the preliminary findings of the study to the Festival of Science, David Lawson, of University College London, said yesterday that having brothers or sisters could have a lifelong impact on health.
“Siblings may represent a threat to development outcomes because they dilute resources be that time, money or love that parents invest in children,” Dr Lawson told the conference. “We show that, all else being equal, growth is significantly retarded by the presence of siblings.”
Dr Lawson emphasised that the conclusions of the study had yet to be confirmed.
The researchers studied children born to 14,000 mothers. The growth rates of the children were measured and then heights were compared with average heights for the corresponding age. They found that to have older siblings had a a bigger impact on the younger siblings than vice versa.
The most damaging combination was to be the younger sibling of older brothers. There was a penalty for having older sisters but the consequences were less than for having older brothers.
The researchers said: “While sibship size effects on height amongst modern societies have been suggested elsewhere, to our knowledge we are the first to demonstrate differential consequences of siblings in regard to relative age and sex.”
Although the precise cause of the stunted growth was unclear, the researchers suggested that a factor could be the condition of the womb after the first pregnancy.

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It is all to do with genetics anyway you look at it.I am 18 and 5'3 i have an older sister 5'0 and a younger brother he is 16 and 5'5 already.Our mum is 5'6 and dad is 5'4.I have a feeling that my brother may be like mum and get abit taller whereas i and my sister take after dad and be shorties.
keith rowland, hertfordshire, england
For me this is true has u have an older sister 5'8 an older brother 6'0 then me age 39 and 5'0.Both my parents have good heights mum 5'6 and dad 5'11.Me i am the same height has my nan.To which she is very proud of has she laughs and says it is good to look in someones face like mine what a laugh !!
Robert Manning, redcar, England
I don't buy this. As the oldest sibling, I measure 6 ft., my younger brother at 6 ft 3 in., and our youngest sister at almost 6 ft. 2 in. Obviously neither of my younger sibling suffered in terms of lost height...unless you consider that none of us quite measured up to our father, who was 6 ft. 6 in.
Emily, Kawasaki, Japan
I don't buy this. I am the oldest, measuring in at 6 feet. My younger brother is at least 6 ft. 3 in., and my sister the youngest measures at almost 6 ft. 2 in. Obviously neither my brother or sister suffered in terms of height from being younger siblings...unless you count the fact that none of us became quite as tall as my dad, who measured 6 ft. 6 in.
Emily, Kawasaki, Japan
Rubbish! My parents had 5 children, 4 girls then a boy, each one taller than the last except for the third child, who is the tallest girl by 3 inches. The youngest, the only boy, is tallest by an inch and is about an inch taller than our father.
I would suggest that the age difference between siblings is a huge factor in this. My family is spread over 14 years: 1st child -> 18 months -> second child -> 3 years -> 3rd child -> 5 years -> 4th child -> 5 years -> 5th child.
I would say that this theory rings true only for the first 2 children because although number 2 is taller than number 1 by 2 inches, she is of a much lighter build - a natural size 6/8 compared to a natural 10.
However, this particular type of build runs through the family on my fathers side though our grandmother, as number 2 looks very similar to her half-auntie, my dads half-sister, and various of my nieces and nephews have inherited it also.
So put that into your genetic model! No really, do!
Liz Scott, Gutersloh, Germany
All I can say is that it was not always so!!! I am the eldest of four and I was born in 1935. I reached the great height of 5ft 3ins. My brother who is two years younger is 6ft 1in. My sister was 5ft 8ins -- shorter now thanks to two back operations-- and the baby of the family, another brother is 6ft 2ins. My mother always blamed errant genes as my maternal grandmother was 5ft and my maternal grandfather was 6ft 4ins. Our family has been a right old mixture ever since. My mother who was the second born was the tallest of her female siblings at 5ft 6ins with an elder sister at 5ft 3ins and a younger one at 5ft 1in and a baby brother who just about topped 5ft 8ins.We are a fairly prolific family and your findings just do not fit us at all. The exception that proves the rule perhaps!
Sheila Cross, Huntingdon, England