Marie Woolf, Whitehall Editor
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
THE trend for healthier eating has led to an increase of more than 300% in the
number of laboratory experiments conducted on animals for food additives,
sweeteners and health supplements over the past year.
Home Office figures showed an increase from 862 to 4,038 experiments from 2005
to 2006.
The disclosure will ignite an ethical debate about the way animals have become
victims of the fad for health foods. Animal welfare groups said many of the
tests are unnecessary or could be performed on humans.
The experiments often involve using painful procedures and artificially
induced injuries to research the effects of food.
In a test at Glasgow University, rodents were fed raspberry juice and then
killed to see where the juice had gone in their kidneys, liver and brains.
At Hammersmith hospital, west London, rats were force-fed fish supplements,
while at Glasgow Caledonian University they had the food supplement ginkgo
biloba injected into their paws.
At Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, rats were fed a diet containing 20%
raw, lightly cooked or fully cooked cabbage for two weeks. The animals were
killed to examine the effects of the diet on their liver and colon. The
researchers had already carried out a human study on the effects on the gut
of eating cooked cabbage.
Other experiments included feeding a health drink to rats to see whether they
ate more chocolate, vanilla or asparagus flavour.
Although most food tests are performed on rodents, rabbits, guinea pigs and
dogs are also used.
In experiments in the United States, Teavigo, a purified green tea extract, available by mail order in Britain, was rubbed onto the shaved backs of guinea pigs and rabbits and put in the eyes of live rabbits.
Dogs force-fed huge doses of Teavigo - which is marketed as “green tea in its purest form” and a choice for “health-conscious consumers” - died or had to be put down.
Gerhard Gans, director of regulatory affairs at DSM Nutritional Products, which produces Teavigo, said: “In some cases it is necessary to use dogs, they are in some aspects more similar to humans than rats . . . where it is possible to use alternative methods validated by the authorities we will use [them].”
Home Office statistics show that in addition to the experiments for additives there was a 30% increase to 7,477 tests on animals for other foods from 2005-6.
A spokesman said the tests on food are needed to meet regulatory requirements.
Michelle Thew, chief executive of the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, said: “The rise in testing of food on animals in the race to find the next lucrative ‘super-food’ is a hidden scandal. People are unaware of the animal suffering behind the headlines.”
Additional reporting: Roger Waite

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Isn't there enough suffering, cruelty, violence and injustice in this world without having to inflict further pain and suffering on innocent animals. The more society 'advances' the worse it seems to become...
Leane Belgrove, Pretoria, South Africa
The thought of all the poor animals in labs all around the world being tortured sickens me deeply, and for what the tests they do are pointless, its like these people just want to torment inocent animals to justifiy there job.....
Hayley, reading, england
Surely everyone knows by now that behind all this animal testing is millions of pounds , thats why they do not want give it up!! They have no campasion at all for these poor defencless animals that are SUFFERING UNNESERSARY , T here are no words bad enough to say , How bad I feel about this !!!!!
Val Kerry, Nottingham, England
I think it is croll so we will all have to triy to stop it it is crool
Dale gasson, normandy, iland
Our species is so incredibly cruel and stupid that we continue to do these "tests" on animals that aren't actually tests at all. What exactly do the so-called scientists think they are testing? If you give any animal a substance, it will have certain results in their systems that will not show up in human systems - or maybe they will at different levels. There is no way to extrapolate intelligently. And, any animal given an overdose of anything will get sick or die. We already know how most of these substances react in humans. And, if we don't, let's test them in humans, where at least the sampling group will have some bearing on the population at large. Animal testing is a hideous form of torture done for the benefit of the legal system. It's an outrage to any intelligent, thoughtful, compassionate person.
Valerie Traina, Centennial, CO/USA
So we are testing on animals. I fail to see the problem. Animals are not people, they cannot work for their stay. They aren't people. There is no ethical dilemma here.
Dobbs_Head, Troy,
I really do not understand why we need to continue to test products which have already undergone tests
if there is a need to test them which would require the death of or injury to an animal, quite simply do not allow the product to be sold
remember thalidomide? worked well on animals...
in sadness
David, Chester
David Jamieson, Chester,
Surely you are aware of what is behind " all the testing"??? Millions of dollars! It's a huge industry and one that won't go quiety into the night. The only way to make true change is through education and then through the voice of the people. Grass roots will always create the change and greed & power will always try to re direct it back into its own camp again but under a different name, same intention! Look closely and stay aware. All of life matters, we are all one.
Valjean~ San Diego, CA
Valjean, san diego, california
Well, people are finally getting what they deserve. We demand "healthier" food, we demand that our food be 100% safe, we demand that our food be cheap and readily available----how are manufacturers going to provide all of that without animal testing? They can't. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an ignorant fool. So, we are either content with what is available to us, grow all our own food in our backyard, or tolerate animal testing. Take your pick.
Janipurr, San Jose, USA
all animal testing must be stopped it is cruel and pointless
Marlene Beck, Leicester,
Besides the inhumane cruelty involved towards the animals, surely the main point is the fact that animal testing is virtually useless when it involves products that are ingested, absorbed or injected into the system.... some drugs animals tolerate are lethal to humans, even in miniscule doses..... and vice versa. We are a different species with different metabolisms and chemical reactions to substances, therefore many of these animal trials are absolutely useless to mankind!!
Deborah , Shropshire, UK
And all for vanity and a deperation to live forever. Sad, sad people.
judy, Liverpool, england
Surely i wouldn't want people cutting me up and check where did the raspberry juice go in my body. To a certain extend some of the experiment is inevitable for the good of understanding more about things that we eat and it make sense to test it on animals rather than speculating theories about nutrition.
Jack, Liverpool, UK
Looks like some of the commentators here are going to starve to death unless theyve got big gardens on a hilltop totally free from Chernobyl fallout and general global contamination.
alan, warks, uk
I am a health concious vegetarian as is my son. We drink green tea and other sorts of herbal teas. I will most deifnately be avoiding this Teavigo and will be looking into who markets it.
I should imagine that the majority of people who care about what they eat also care about not harming animals in the process.
I am lucky in that I have the choice to eat what I want to eat, what a terrible shame (and the shame rests mostly on the shoulders of those who perform these 'experiments') these animal have no choice in how they live or die.
Kim, london,
I would boycott any food product I discovered had been tested on animals. WHY is this necessary? Surely if we, the humans, are going to eat it, then it makes sense to test it on us, not animals that bear little or physiological resemblance to us! I tried to avoid processed foods anyway so additives are not an issue for me, but the idea of force-feeding animals green tea or raspberries....well, it just beggars belief.
Lyn Morton, Leeds, UK
As always, in the vaguely defined aim of 'human safety' other animals are most hideously used in secret places by people with no names. Yet, we still allow it.
helen, Norwich,
I'm thinking of writing a book, a sort of autobiography with an emphasis on my increasing level of disgust at the things we humans get up to in the name of (our) self preservation. My favourite for the title is "Life among the barbarians" - it seems appropriate.
Don't these researchers possess any form of compassion? or even the level of imagination which would allow them to envision themselves being experimented on in a similar fashion by some "superior" species?
Derrick, MK, UK