Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall

A long, thin rope-like creature standing erect on the sea floor up to 570 million years ago has been identified as the first animal on Earth to have had sex.
Fossilised remains of the mysterious tubular creature have been uncovered in Australia and put back the history of sex by up to 30 million years. While the experience was unlikely to have been memorable for the animals, the discovery has excited scientists who said that the fossils open a window on one of the most ancient ecosystems.
The knobbly animal, named Funisia dorothea, is thought most likely to have reproduced in a similar way to modern corals and sponges, but little else is understood of its biology.
Researchers identified the creature’s capacity for sexual rather than asexual reproduction because fossil specimens were found in groups that all appeared to be the same age. Because they had found a foothold in a sandy seabed at the same time, it was considered they must have resulted from a simultaneous spawning instead of uncoordinated asexual births.
Mary Droser, the paleontologist who led the excavations, named the animal after her 80-year-old mother, Dorothy Droser, who took care of the paleontologist’s young children and cooked for the research team on several digs in the Australian outback.
Mrs Droser said she was “thrilled to tears” at having a fossil named in her honour. She thought it appropriate that the ancient beast was the first to have sexual relations: “My family thinks it’s humorous. I have 11 grandchildren — obviously reproduction is a good thing.”
Sex for the creature would have been functional rather than a social affair, Professor Droser, of the University of California, Riverside, said. “I think they would have been way too basic to have enjoyed the sex. I don’t think they would wind around each other. But I could be wrong — I would like to think they enjoyed it.”
The only time the Earth moved for the creatures, researchers suspect, was when a storm churned up the seabed and covered them with sand, killing them but allowing their bodies to be preserved. Funisia dorothea thrived on the sea floor in the Neoproterozoic era, a 100-million-year period ending about 540 million years ago, and formed part of the earliest known animal ecosystem. It was a soft-bodied creature that grew 30cm long and would have been safe from predators because it would be several more million years before they evolved. Even scavengers had yet to appear. Once the tubular animals had fixed themselves to the seabed, either as a larva or a fertilised egg, they were immobile and unable to go off in search of mates. Researchers, who reported their findings in the journal Science, were unable to identify a mouth or any other recognisable anatomy.
“In general, individuals of an organism grow close to each other, in part, to ensure reproductive success,” said Professor Droser, who co-authored the report with James Gehling of the South Australia Museum.
“In Funisia, we are very likely seeing sexual reproduction in Earth’s early ecosystem – possibly the very first instance of sexual reproduction in animals on our planet. How Funisia appears in the fossils clearly shows that ecosystems were complex very early in the history of animals on Earth.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I can't imagine why they would have made the effort if they didn't feel some chance of a reward.
Maybe just a chemical attraction, but who's to say we humans are any more than that, however we may rationalise.
But I need more evidence than grouping to believe it. JMart has a point.
Simon, Japan,
I agree with JMart. True science is supposed to be about testable theories based on factual data. Much of what we hear these days, with regard to origins, is based on the presuppositions of the scientists involved rather on proven data. Bill, Belfast
Bill Holloway, Belfast, UK
This is an outrageous conclusion. I am sure that at some point in evolutionary history the 1st sexual act or motion was performed but to identify this as that particular case is a little baffling.
Recently i saw an article on the transmission of sexual diseases and instantly thought why is it they are sexually transmitted. Someone or something got it first and how?
St paddy, Bristol , UK
its all a bit odd when an erect arrangement called funny Dorothy was the first creature to have sex ? Dorothy was i fact thrilled to tears it seems.
rwn, muston,
"The only time the Earth moved for the creatures, researchers suspect, was when a storm churned up the seabed and covered them with sand, killing them but allowing their bodies to be preserved.
"The only time the earth moved. . ." Indeed. Such wit is all too seldom written today. Thanks, Mr. Smith.
Jeff Kilgore, Ozawkie, USA/Kansas
I wonder what it was that Adam whispered in the ear of Dorothea in that la-la land of garden delights: Funisia
David E. Mahony
David E. Mahony, London, UK
This is really not well thought out. A variety of factors could lead to either simultaneous reproduction by non-sexual means (seasonal factors, availabillity of food, etc.) or grouping of similar aged/sized individuals.
Science is supposed to be about drawing testable conclusions from logical thought about real data, but this is just silly guessing -- probably based on an urge to get one's name in the news.
JMart, USA,
Scientists are a laugh a minute, whatever next, pull the other one it's got bells on it!
Humanity is far older than these people can even imagine, they make the most absurd assumptions based on the premise that we are the only human type life forms to exist ,and, as if that were not enough, they can only imagine that we 'evolved' here in a rediculously tiny time frame.
Wake up please.
Clive Burghard, LANCING, ENGLAND
HOW - How do we know this.... How do they not know that next year they'll find something a 100years older, and find that - that had Sex first.
I don't see HOW they can know this! Haha!
But if it's true, it's pretty cool...
Kirk, Spilsby, United Kingdom
They would have needed a foothold in the sandy sea bed - otherwise they might have got carried away with all the excitement.
Perhaps from now on we should call it 'having a dorothy'.
Donald Morrison, Lochgilphead, Scotland
Sex without an orifice. Good God, how boring is that?
Eugene, heidelberg, germany
30 Million BC -- Sex is first documented.
One minute later -- God decides Creation is worth the effort.
Eugene, heidelberg, germany
Well, no wonder he was inclined to sex, I mean if he was standing erect on the sea floor.
Eugene, heidelberg, germany
So sex really was invented in Australia. Well, that figures.
comatus, East Toledo, Ohio, USA
-- Sex for the creature would have been functional rather than a social affair, Professor Droser, of the University of California, Riverside, said. âI think they would have been way too basic to have enjoyed the sex --.
You mean...
...they were married?
Eugene, heidelberg, germany
Maybe God really did say, "be fruitful and multiply." Even to a worm. Since when is there joy in sex? She has a headache!
Pete King, Dakota City,, USA Nebraska