Mark Henderson, Science Editor
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

It is the most ambitious and expensive civilian science experiment in history, based on the biggest machine that humanity has yet built. It has sparked alarmist fears that it might create a black hole that will tear the Earth apart, and it has triggered two last-minute legal attempts to stop it. And next Wednesday, after almost two decades of planning and construction, the project in question will finally get under way.
Beneath the foothills of the Jura mountains, in a network of tunnels that bring to mind the lair of a crazed Bond villain, scientists will fire a first beam of particles around a ring as long as the Circle Line on the London Underground. This colossal circuit, 17 miles (27km) in circumference, is the world’s most powerful atom-smasher, the £3.5 billion Large Hadron Collider (LHC), created at CERN, the European particle physics laboratory near Geneva. Some 10,000 scientists and engineers from 85 countries have been involved. In the years ahead it will recreate the high-energy conditions that existed one trillionth of a second after the big bang. In doing so, it should solve many of the most enduring mysteries of the Universe.
This extraordinary feat of engineering will accelerate two streams of protons to within 99.9999991 per cent of the speed of light, so that they complete 11,245 17-mile laps in a single second. The two streams will collide, at four points, with the energy of two aircraft carriers sailing into each other at 11 knots, inside detectors so vast that one is housed in a cavern that could enclose the nave of Westminster Abbey. The detectors will trace the sub-atomic debris that is thrown off by the collisions, to reveal new particles and effects that may never have existed on Earth before.
The mountains of data produced will shed light on some of the toughest questions in physics. The origin of mass, the workings of gravity, the existence of extra dimensions and the nature of the 95 per cent of the Universe that cannot be seen will all be examined. Perhaps the biggest prize of all is the “God particle” – the Higgs boson. This was first proposed in 1964 by Peter Higgs, of Edinburgh University, as an explanation for why matter has mass, and can thus coalesce to form stars, planets and people. Previous atom-smashers, however, have failed to find it, but because the LHC is so much more powerful, scientists are confident that it will succeed.
Even a failure, however, would be exciting, because that would pose new questions about the laws of nature.
“What we find honestly depends on what’s there,” said Brian Cox, of the University of Manchester, an investigator on one of the four detectors, named Atlas. “I don’t believe there’s ever been a machine like this, that’s guaranteed to deliver. We know it will discover exciting things. We just don’t know what they are yet.” The guarantee applies, however, only if the hardware works as it should, and the LHC’s first big test comes on Wednesday, when the first beam of particles is injected into the accelerator. That is a huge technical challenge. “The beam is 2mm in diameter and has to be threaded into a vacuum pipe the size of a 50p piece around a 27km loop,” said Lyn Evans, the LHC’s project manager, who will oversee the insertion. “It is not going to be trivial.”
Engineers will use magnets to bend the beam around the LHC’s eight sectors, until it finally begins to circulate. “That’ll be the first sight of relief, that there are no obstacles in the vacuum chamber,” Dr Evans said. “There could be a Kleenex in the chamber – we’ve had that before. Only when we get the beam around will we be able to tell it’s clear.”
Once the first beam is in – probably the one running clockwise, though that has yet to be decided – the team will insert the second, anticlockwise stream of particles. The first collisions, to test the detectors, should follow by the end of next week.
The next step will be to “capture” the beams so they fire in short pulses, 2,800 times a second. These will then be accelerated to an energy of 5 tera-electronvolts (TeV), generating collisions of 10TeV.The detectors should be calibrated by the end of the year and the collisions will then be ramped up to their maximum energy of 14TeV, generating the conditions that prevailed fractions of a second after the Big Bang.
One of the first scientific discoveries is likely to concern a theory called supersymmetry. Tejinder Virdee, of Imperial College, London, who leads the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) detector team, said: “What supersymmetry predicts is that, for every particle you have a partner, so it doubles up the spectrum. You have a whole new zoology of particles, if you like.”
Theory suggests that if supersymmetry is real, evidence to confirm it should emerge quickly from the LHC, possibly as soon as next year. “If it pops up it’ll be quite easy to see,” Professor Cox said.
Such a discovery might also help to explain dark matter, which is thought to account for much of the missing mass of the Universe. Only about 4 per cent of matter – galaxies and the like – is visible to our telescopes. “In this new zoology, the lightest super-symmetric particle is a prime candidate for explaining dark matter,” Professor Virdee said.
The search for the Higgs could take longer, though it depends on the particle’s mass and thus the energy of the collisions in which it might be found. If it is at the heavier end of the possible range, the discovery could take as little as 12 months. A lighter Higgs would take longer to find, as the particles into which it would decay would also be lighter and harder to track.
Other potential discoveries include evidence for the existence of extra dimensions beyond the familiar three of space and one of time, and the creation of miniature (and harmless) black holes, though these are less probable. “Most of us think we’d be very lucky to find these things,” Professor Cox said.
There are two more detectors. The LHCb will investigate why there is any matter in the Universe at all, while Alice aims to study a mixture known as quark-gluon plasma, which last existed in the first millionth of a second after the big bang.
From gluons to sparticles
Particle
In physics, this term refers to sub-atomic particles – entities that are
smaller than atoms. Some, such as protons and electrons, are the
constituents of atoms. Others, such as quarks, are the constituents of other
particles. Still others, such as photons and neutrinos, are generated by the
Sun. And yet more, such as the Higgs boson, are theoretical: predicted but
still undiscovered
Hadron
This is more than an excuse for a geeky physics joke – “Is that your hadron,
or are you just pleased to see me?” Hadrons are particles with mass, made up
of quarks that have been bound together
Protons, neutrons, quarks and gluons
Protons and neutrons are the best-known types of hadron. Each is composed of
three smaller units, called quarks, and gluons that stick the quarks
together. Protons have a positive charge, while neutrons have a neutral
charge
Higgs boson
A theoretical particle, which is thought to give matter its mass. First
proposed by Peter Higgs, of the University of Edinburgh, in 1964, it is
sometimes nicknamed the “God particle”. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
should confirm whether it exists. The theory suggests that other particles
travel through and interact with a field of Higgs bosons, which slows the
particles down and gives rise to their mass. The process is often likened to
moving through treacle. In the early 1990s Lord Waldegrave of North Hill,
then the Science Minister, staged a competition for the best explanation.
The winning analogy was of Margaret Thatcher – a massive particle –
wandering through a Tory cocktail party and gathering hangers-on as she went
Standard model
The orthodox theory of modern physics. It is based on two other theories –
general relativity and quantum mechanics – and its main weakness is that it
cannot yet fully describe gravity or mass
Quantum mechanics
The main principle of the standard model, which describes how particles and
forces behave at atomic and sub-atomic scales
General relativity
Einstein’s theory describing gravity. It is exceptionally well attested, but
not fully compatible with quantum mechanics
Supersymmetry
The hypothesis that all particles have an accompanying partner known as a
“superparticle” or “sparticle”. There is good theoretical evidence for it,
but it has not yet been confirmed by experiment
Dark matter
Only about 4 per cent of the Universe is made up of visible matter. Another
25 per cent is “dark matter” – which can be inferred from its gravity, but
cannot be seen. The remaining 71 per cent is still more mysterious “dark
energy”. The LHC could shed light on what dark matter is, possibly through
discoveries about supersymmetry
Extra dimensions
We are all familiar with four dimensions – three of space and one of time.
But some theoretical physicists suggest that there could be as many as 26.
Most physicists find these every bit as hard to visualise as normal people,
but they make mathematical sense

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It's an amazing feat by the human race to have come up with the idea of recreating the big bang - and actually doing it is equally so. However, as a theorist, I do not believe that the Higg's boson, nor black holes will be 'created' or found by the scientists at CERN. I do, however, fully support it
Peter B, London, UK
I find the idea of learning more about our universe, existence, and, quite possibly, ourselves a fascinating idea. Not too keen on the black hole "rumor". To any and all skeptics/naysayers: The more knowledge we have, the better. Who knows what applications just one of those answers will have!
Adrienne, Gladstone, USA
Stop. God can create and even destroy the Universe.
harbhajan, Mumbai, India
its wrong, they can only predict its harmless. but they never know the truth until its too late. remember what happened to the curious cat?? who cares how we began, the important thing is to preserve what we have and spend billions on the environment instead.
j clark, doncaster, uk
i dont think they should do it. what is more imporetent finding out how the earth started or living?
i think there pathetic and stupid to even think of somthing like this.
hollie, Sheffield, England
Query:Will we uncover the "Tangent Gene" that the "Creator" imbeded in order to protect itself from detection? Or shall it be not unlike those spectacular moments of profound thought, where the answer is upon us, only to be flung in endless confusion? LHC may solve the riddle
Leslie Sylvan, sheffield,
yeah....but.....Kevin Keegan has been sacked by Newastle United...!!!!
:)
Dean, Darlington, UK
I sure it´s no as important as the starvation issue.
Leonardo, Salvador, Brazil
I wonder how Simon from Northern Ireland is writing his mystical views, on a computer perchance, developed by the same science he doesn't believe in? Perhaps he thinks God is using his angels to make the screen glow...
Minski, Cardiff,
How are they going to discover new particles that supposedly occured during the big bang when it was God that created the Earth and the Heavens which don't even exist theoretically as the light is so old whole galaxies are now gone that we can see Scientists are Heathens and man is to wonder at God.
Simon, Omagh, Northern Ireland
Why do we need another one, NuLabour have already created a black hole to put our taxes in.
Kevin, Leeds,
Wow!
Can't wait for the results. Keep us posted, please.
Chris Jordan, Alhaurin, Spain
Id rather have my tax money spent on this than the throw-away olympics. Fully support this and hope it starts to answer the hardest questions in particle & quantam physics. About time we got a move on again as a race.
Chris, Rochdale, UK
I was a part of this, until I left to work in finance, so I am excited to see the work from all those years ago about to be put to the test. I am very glad that my taxes paid since have gone to keep the UK so deeply involved in this amazing experiment, and cannot wait to see the results start coming
John, London,
Personally, while this is all very fascinating, I am not sure what benefits this will bring the real world. We need to find solutions for water, energy and food shortages - I do not see thia as helping. Good for scientists but concerned if my tax contributions paid for this.
Ian Dixon, London, UK
Only one thing is guaranteed, we're going to fiddle just once too often.
Ray, Sydney, Australia
The answer, as written by Douglas Adams, is 42. Problem solved!!
Mark, Swindon, UK
A new very controversial book soon to be released is going to show that there are no particles called Neutrons That the Neutron is simply a package of dynamic energy. The LHC is merely delivering packages of dynamic energy to the detector through pipes completely full of electromagnetic force fields
Chris Coles, Medstead, Alton, United Kingdom
Don't start any long books !
Richard sixsmith, Belgrade, Serbia
Although the two particles appear (to an outside observer) to be approaching at very nearly twice the speed of light, special relativity says this is not so. From the point of view of each particle, the other is approaching at very very nearly the speed of light!
Martin, Newmarket, Suffolk
Martyn from Spain, you are confusing collision speed with actual speed. Neither particle is moving faster than the speed of light.
Michael Man, Hong Kong, China
Like a part of the plot in Angels and Demons isn't it.
Linda Dial, Calgary, Canada
Martyn - you're confusing speed with velocity. That's what gets added together when things collide. Velocity is (basically) measured in terms of speed and direction. One particle will have a velocity of x and the other will have a velocity of -x. What do you get when you add x and -x? Zero!
Matthew Lancey, Sydney, Australia
Pretty Interesting Stuff. Somewhat alarming that the world could be swallowed by a blackhole, but nonetheless its definately something that I support.
Mark, Brisbane, Australia
A profound waste of money? Science has advanced to a state where experiments involving a few liquids and bunsen burners have little remaining value. To explain the biggest remaining mysteries needs the biggest machines. See ITER, Hubble Space Telescope, etc.
Orestis, London, UK
I'm confused, one particle goes in around at almost light speed and the other goes in the other direction likewise so their collision speed is nearly twice the speed of light. Except it cannot be. So what speed do they actually collide at? Or do they do it somewhere/sometime else? Great stuff.
Martyn, Calvia, Spain
What supersymmetry predicts is that, for every particle you have a partner, so it doubles up the spectrum. You have a whole new zoology of particles, if you like.
Dark matter will be the opposing particles that they look for
Simple reasoning dark matter cannot be seen either
Nicholas Iles, Oswestry, Shropshire, United Kingdom
What would you rather spend money on, wars and fast cars? Thought not.
This is excellent alot of questions could be answered with this, then again maybe not. It could be a complete failure.
Tho the idea of a blackhole opening is rather unsettling, if it all goes wrong i'd doubt we'd notice.
Noel, Belfast, N.Ireland
What a profoundly limited viewpoint. To counter-point that I
offer,
"The heavens call to you, and circle about you, displaying to you their eternal splendors, and your eye gazes only to earth." -- Dante
"I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space." -- Hamlet
Johnny Bannister, London, United Kingdom
What a profound waste of money
Paul, Albuquerque, USA