Sarah-Kate Templeton Health Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

The parents of the first British baby screened to be free of a breast cancer gene have spoken publicly about their “beautiful” daughter - and revealed that they plan to have more children free of the hereditary condition.
“She is a beautiful, healthy baby girl,” the child’s mother told The Sunday Times in her only interview. “She has 10 fingers and 10 toes. She’s 100% healthy.”
The parents are remaining anonymous to protect the baby, who was born last week. They are pioneers of a breakthrough in the fight against “hereditary” cancer. Though the parents could conceive naturally, they underwent IVF and genetic screening because three generations of women in the husband’s family had suffered from breast cancer. The procedure ensured that a gene associated with the cancer would not be present in the baby.
The 26-year-old mother said: “To be able to look at our daughter and to know that she doesn’t have the gene is a massive sigh of relief for us. We have eliminated that risk and that is priceless.”
She revealed that the couple have a stock of healthy embryos in storage which they plan to use to have more children without the hereditary condition.
Her husband’s mother, grandmother and sister have suffered breast cancer and endured gruelling chemotherapy and radiotherapy sessions in their battles against the disease.
The baby’s 28-year-old father said: “A massive amount of credit has to go to my wife for undergoing what was effectively an invasive procedure of IVF for a problem which wasn’t her own but was from my side of the family. Talking about how we felt about it probably brought us closer together.”
The couple produced 11 embryos, of which five were found to be free of the gene. The spare healthy embryos have been frozen and the couple hope to be able to have brothers and sisters for their daughter. They do not know whether the embryos in storage will be sufficient to complete their family.
“It depends how many kids we want and, when we implant the embryos, if they take,” the mother said.
The baby’s father said it was a great privilege to be able to pioneer the treatment and to know that he had spared any future children the blight of breast cancer.
“There are many pitfalls my children may go through in
life that I cannot predict for them. We do know about this one and that is why we felt a duty to do something about it.”
The couple hope their treatment, which has prompted a debate about the ethics of embryo screening, will help other families to avoid heartache and suffering.
The mother said: “Having watched my husband’s family go through what they have been through, knowing that [my daughter] doesn’t need to go through that, makes it all worthwhile. I hope this encourages others to do the same.”
Undergoing IVF, she said, was a small price to pay. In the treatment, which was conducted at the private assisted conception unit at University College London hospitals, the couple created embryos in vitro so that they could be screened for a faulty gene called BRCA-1, which ran in the father’s family. If they had conceived naturally there would have been a 50% chance of their child carrying the gene. A female carrier would then have faced an 80% chance of developing breast cancer and a 60% chance of ovarian cancer.
Though cure rates for breast cancer are improving, the illness can still exact a heavy toll on survivors.
The baby’s paternal grandmother, who has suffered from breast cancer, said: “Not everyone is fortunate enough to be cured of breast cancer and the treatments that women have along the way are horrific.
“I went through a year of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and this had a huge impact on our family. To know that this child, and the generation after her, will not have this cloud hanging over them is just wonderful.”
She said the couple’s treatment, called preimplantation genetic diagnosis, had removed the “sword of Damocles” that hung over the family.
Critics accuse doctors of pioneering a technology that leads science further down the road to “designer babies”. They point out that a female gene carrier may not develop breast cancer in adulthood and that, even if she does, the disease now has a high cure rate.
Paul Serhal, lecturer at University College London and medical director of the assisted conception unit, said: “This little girl will not face the spectre of developing this genetic form of breast cancer or ovarian cancer in her adult life.
“The parents will have been spared the risk of inflicting this disease on their daughter. The lasting legacy is the eradication of the transmission of this form of cancer that has blighted these families for generations.” The baby’s father said: “You never hear people who have been through breast cancer bringing up those points. It is a devastating illness.”
Serhal and colleagues at University College have been credited with pioneering the screening out of hereditary cancers, including genetic forms of bowel cancer and cancer of the retina.
It is understood that, since they have been working on this technology, babies have been born in America free of the breast cancer gene.
Last year an Israeli woman was reported to be in the advanced stages of pregnancy after her embryos were screened for it.
About 5% of the 44,000 cases of breast cancer in Britain each year are estimated to be caused by the BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 genes, both of which can be detected in embryos.
Many women who test positive for the gene have their breasts removed as a precaution.

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Some dream of the "prefect baby". Meanwhile, children all around the world are abandoned and die.
What will be the next genes to be screened? Why not blue eyes and blonde hair? Are we going towards a brand new "bad gene-free" human "race"? Who will tell which are the bad alleles? When will we begin to prohibit the "classical" reproduction method or enforce obligatory abortion for the genetically unfitted?
I am a biologist. Please tell me I'm just having a nightmare.
xicu, girona, spain
My Year 11 (16 yr olds) class thinks that this is a good thing. 16 students responded and out of these 3 thought it was a bad idea.
Justin Thomas, Biggleswade, England
Is the life of a person who gets breast cancer in her 50s worthless? Shouldn't she have lived the previous four decades? What about everything these people have created/invented/contributed during these years - they are likely to develop a fatal illness in their later life so they deserve NO life?
Claire James, Ruislip, Middlesex
The first thing that came to mind was Gattaca. Sometimes the movies do come true.
If all unhealthy genes were screened out, our society would have lost a lot of people. Many people with incurable diseases, cancers, and disorders would be out ( Roosevelt and Hawkings to name two on a long list).
Kevin , Santa Fe, USA
What is occurring here is the elimination of cancer due to this single mechanism (there are innumerable alternate mechanisms), by killing those who are potentially afflicted.
This eugenic philosophy also kills the impetus to search for cures and treatments.
KB, Lawrenceburg, IN, USA
Next month my wife is having a double skin sparing masectomy because she has the BRCA gene. We have an eight year old daughter who may or may not have it. Hereditary gene testing is the only way forward to stop breast cancer. This is fantastic progress.
David Kershaw, Lichfield, UK
This is good news, incremental progress always is. But I'd like to see radical progress more often!
In the near future, the entire genome (not just 1 gene but thousands) of an embryo could be genetically analyzed before the embryo is placed into a uterus.
Daniel, Redwood City, CA
Don't these people know that there are environmental factors that contribute to breast cancer? Will these girls grow up in a bubble? I wish to live long to see how this one turns out...
Patricia Lee, San Francisco, USA
To be alive is to take risk. A person can be cancer free, yet die of a variety of diseases or accidents. The death rate is one per person. Sooner or later the bell tolls for each of us.
Tracy, Harrisburg, USA
I wonder if the father took a moment to think that, if this procedure were available prior to his mother's or grandmother's conception, they would have been "screened out," and he wouldn't exist to pass the gene along to his perfect daughter.
Which one of our genetic irregularities is next?
Patrick Simons, Laguna Hills, California, USA
Thin end of the wedge, tip of the iceberg, et cetera. Hard to argue this one, but the other embryos with the gene were "discarded" as it says in other articles. Anything to prevent the parents from discarding embryos that will grow up to be short or ugly or stupid?This is well intentioned eugenics
Justin, Dallas, USA
Sounds good, but there are many cancers a person can get. My family history proved breast cancer was the most popular, but now it is showing up in colon, liver, bone.
So, unless science can delete the full gene for all cancers, feel this is not valid.
Sue DeFrance, New York, USA
I knew a family in which my friends mother, sister, aunt and cousin died very quickly from breast cancer. They were mentioned in medical books. That family deserves to be able to have children without that gene and all of the suffering entailed.
M A Parr, St Helens, England
What will the girl think when she grows up and discovers that six of her possible siblings were destroyed because they were 'inferior.?' What are the ethical ramifications of selective parenting? We used to call this abhorent, but now?
Sam, Aledo, USA
We have a duty to do good in this life. In this case the parents, with the help of the doctors, have done good. They have protected their child from harm just as they will when they teach her to cross the road. Ethics are not involved if you believe we should use medicine to save lives.
Katie, Bristol,
Whilst having the parents on one side and the un-named "critics" of designer babies on the other fulfills the criteria of "balance" within this article, it would be nice to see a proper discussion of the ethical issues involved here with contributions from persons with a slightly wider perspective.
Martin, Portsmouth, England