Andy Fox - please open your eyes - I quote 'proved to be untrue' - where and by whom? The scientific evidence is overwhelming and the latest reports e.g.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/09/21/1189881777752.html?s_rid=smh:top5
underpin it.

"The sun is mainly responsible for our naturally changing climate"? How so? please expand...

Unfortunately you have fallen for oil-sponsored 'think tanks'' assertions that there is no problem. The exact same group of people you are blaming for the spread of the alleged climate change lie. A bit paradoxical don't you think?

Nicholas Bernhardt, Tallebudgera, Australia / QLD

Are the floods in Britain really abnormal?
In Yarm, Cleveland, in the high street is a town hall with two plaques showing the height/depth of the flood water in 1881 and 1771. The lower is at chest/head height, whilst the earlier one is at 2.5 m to 3 m above road level, which is way above the current defence levels installed and strengthened in the last 12 years.
So, is it global warming, climate change, or simply natural variations?
And I leave you with: when then Earth was warmer by more than 5 K than it is now, where did the polar bears go? How did they manage? Probably, quite well without human intervention.

Ed Stef, Yarm, Teesside, UK

That's it? Nothing more to say than maybe it is climate change, maybe not? You could at least note the Nature study that convincingly argued for more precipitation in mid-latitudes, exactly as we saw this summer in the UK.

Kit Stolz, California, USA

Climate change due to human carbon emissions has been proved to be untrue and that the sun is mainly responsible for our naturally changing climate. The whole carbon issue is to stop the developing world from developing so that the industrialised countries can use all the oil and not give it to the likes of Africa....it is completely political and people are following the ideology before reading the scientific facts! Wake up!

Andy Fox, Pecs, Hungary