James Bone in New York
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now

The United Nations launched the largest peacekeeping mission in the world last night in an attempt to halt more than four years of massacres that have cost almost a quarter of a million lives in the Darfur region of Sudan.
After months of tortuous negotiation, the UN Security Council adopted unanimously a landmark resolution, co-sponsored by Britain, to create a 26,000-strong “hybrid” UN-African Union peacekeeping force.
The force, to be composed primarily of African troops, will be empowered to “take the necessary action” to prevent attacks and protect civilians in the vast desert region that has been racked by violence since 2003.
Gordon Brown hailed the move during a stop at UN headquarters on his way home from his summit with President Bush. He threatened to seek further sanctions if Sudan failed to co-operate. “This is the world coming together to say that we have a plan now, that we expect the authorities in Sudan to act. We will not tolerate further inaction, and the violence has got to stop now,” Mr Brown said.
The resolution authorises a force of 19,555 troops plus 6,432 civilian police to take over from the overstretched 7,000-strong African Union peacekeeping operation in Darfur by the end of the year.
The hybrid force will try to quell the violence, which began with camelriding Arab Janjawid militia slaughtering black villagers but has now fragmented to involve a patchwork of rebel groups and feuding tribes and has spilt over the borders into Chad and the Central African Republic.
“If Sudan does not comply with this resolution, the United States will move for the swift adoption of unilateral and multilateral measures,” Zalmay Khalilzad, the US Ambassador to the UN, said. “Now Sudan faces a choice. Sudan can choose the path of co-operation or defiance.”
Diplomats had been working to secure Sudan’s agreement to an expanded peacekeeping force. A British-sponsored resolution in 2006, authorising a larger UN force of 17,300 troops plus 3,300 police, came to nothing when Sudan refused to consent.
A summit in Addis Ababa last November devised a new three-tiered proposal, starting with the UN providing first “light support” and then “heavy support” to the African Union operation before establishing the UN-AU force. The UN is still struggling to deploy the “heavy support” package of 2,250 troops, 750 police and six attack helicopters.
Abdalmahmood Abdalhaleem Mohamad, the Sudanese Ambassador to the UN, said that his Government — which includes a minister for humanitarian affairs who has been indicted by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes in Darfur — would implement the resolution establishing the “hybrid” force. He called for renewed efforts to reach a political settlement, after the rejection of the May 2006 Darfur Peace Agreement by two of the three rebel groups that negotiated it. “Peacekeeping should be assisted fully by rejuvenation of the political process,” he told The Times. “There should be a peace to keep.”
Jan Eliasson, the UN mediator, from Sweden, and Salim Salim, of Tanzania, his AU counterpart, are hosting a meeting in the Tanzanian city of Arusha on Friday to try to persuade non-signatory rebels to renew negotiations with the Sudanese Government.
“The plan for Darfur is to achieve a ceasefire, including an end to aerial bombings of civilians; drive forward peace talks starting in Arusha, Tanzania, this weekend on August 3; and as peace is established to offer to and begin to invest in recovery and reconstruction,” Mr Brown said at the UN. “But we must be clear: if any party blocks progress and the killings continue, I and others will redouble our efforts to impose further sanctions.”
The UN maintains an arms embargo on Darfur and individual travel bans and asset freezes against four individuals — a former air force commander, a Janjawid militia chief and two Darfurian rebel commanders. Britain and the US have threatened to seek an expanded arms embargo covering all of Sudan and to add the names of more individuals and companies to the UN blacklist if Khartoum fails to co-operate.
The new force will overtake the 17,000-strong operation in the Democratic Republic of Congo to become the largest UN peacekeeping mission, costing an estimated $2.6 billion (£1.3 billion) a year. It will run in parallel with the existing UN peacekeeping mission in southern Sudan, which comprises about 16,000 personnel and costs $1 billion a year.
At Sudan’s insistence the new force will have a “predominantly African character”. China, an ally of Sudan, signalled yesterday that it may be willing to provide peacekeeping troops. China has already pledged 275 soldiers for the UN’s “heavy support” package in Darfur and could provide engineers to help to establish the new force. The Chinese Ambassador to the UN said that Beijing would send more troops if it were approached.
China buys two thirds of Sudan’s oil and is facing calls for a boycott of the 2008 Beijing Olympics for not applying enough pressure on the Sudanese Government over Darfur.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
In relation to the Darfur conflict, why is it the media insist on protraying the conflict as RACIAL.Using terms and phrases as 'ARABS' KILLING 'BLACK AFRICANS.'
Surely the various ethnic and tribal groups that make up the Sudanese population are all 'AFRICANS' irrespective of whether they speak arabic or other languages.
Furthermore many Sudanese that are labelled arabs are not 'ethnic arabs' and were assimilated in the 'arabization' of the middle east and the maghreb.
joseph, chingford,
What a waste of time and more western finance. Africa is so corrupt it must be impossible to do do any good in any of the countries.
To suggest that African troops can do the job of controlling the problem must be the joke of the century. A huge and costly public relations excercise that will achieve nothing.
Who thought this up, Cameron?
Kenneth Wheatley, St Pée sur Nivelle, France
A half hearted response, made only after Arab peoples have ethnically cleansed the indigenous population from their homeland.
As usual the British press have suppressed the true nature of the racially motivated ethnic cleansing of black people.
Shame on you all.
You will be held accountable.
henry adams, manchester, UK, UK
gosh, yet another u.n resolution. just what we need to stop the slaughter in sudan, and it only took four years in the making.
sadly, the peace-keeping force will only be there on terms agreed or dictated by the same sudanese government responsible for much of the slaughter perpetrated by the janjawid militia it has been backing.
in common with the black african members of the u.n, who blocked action against the evil tyranny of mugabe in zimbabwe, the sudanese government have insisted that most of the peace-keepers are black african. why?
even the worst excesses of the aparhteid regime in south africa pale into insignificance in the eyes of those witnessing the horrors that black africans in one african nation after another have perpetrated against their own neighbours.
the (u.n)learned lesson remains that the cost of delay, indecision, fudge, and political cowardice is unnecessary loss of life...usually in huge numbers.
will richards, droitwich,
Hope is something we all have, or we die. Innocent men, women, children have been brutally raped, hacked, murdered. What kind of world have we become if we continue to sit back and do nothing. Even if we make a small impact, it will save some lives...lives worth living.
Denise , Newport Beach, CA USA
Sudan is a huge country, this force will not be able to put a stop to the war. Mr Brown can shout "The violence must now" all he likes but I doubt many in the Sudan cares what he thinks. Such bombastic posturing is ultimately dangerous as it creates false expectations and is reminiscent of Blair's grandstanding as we entered Iraq. We need to be realistic about the aims of these troops. They will have their job cut out protecting aid agencies. Political pressure to make it sort out all of Sudan's problems does not help. They cannot stop the war, it would take force ten times their size to even have a hope.
Mark, Newcastle,
we must do something for it. now.
colin cao, BEIJING, CHINA
Why British has been always standing together with the digusting US?World never need global police?
mellon, birminghan,
The UN forces will be too weak...the mandate wil be on the lines of if you're fired at shout at them with harsh language...A good idea in principle but a bad one on practice....The UN has no teeth.
kirk, Rotherham, UK
As has been said, why did this take so long? As hasn't been said, will the abuse of the locals by African Union troops now cease? If it doesn't we are just replacing one set of murderers with another.
John, Dundee, UK
Nice of the UN to finally do something whilst there are some people left to save.
Bruce Northwood, Washgingto, D.C., USA
No way! The UN has done something useful? And it only took them FOUR years to stop the slaughter of villiagers? Hats off to your promptness.
Jo, OP, US
Who is recruiting the Civilian Police Force (CIV/POL)?
Joe Popeye Saylor, Lake Worth, Fl/USA