Lewis Smith, Environment Reporter
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times

A wildlife reserve earmarked for destruction to make way for biofuel crops has been saved after a study showed that it would earn more from eco-tourism.
More than 7,000 hectares of a Ugandan forest described as a “wildlife jewel” were to be torn down and replanted with sugar cane for the production of ethanol.
Three people were killed during protests organised by environmental groups this year when the issue inflamed racial tensions in the country because of the involvement of Asian businessmen in the biofuel scheme.
The proposal was backed initially by the Ugandan Government but the decision to give the Mehta Group, owned by an ethnicly Asian family, a third of the supposedly protected Mabira Forest Reserve near Lake Victoria has now been reversed. Conservationists were jubilant and relieved.
“This is a tragedy averted,” said Paul Buckley, of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). “It was ludicrous even to think of sacrificing such a precious site to a crop that is already so heavily subsidised in Uganda.
“The forest would have been irreversibly damaged had this giveaway gone ahead. Now Uganda has a brilliant opportunity to really make the most of its wildlife jewels. The site is famous with eco-tourists and slicing it up made no economic sense whatsoever.”
Ato Mengistu Wondafrash, of BirdLife International, said: “We applaud the Ugandan Government for taking this bold decision to protect its forest resources despite the intentions of the sugar company. I cannot wait to go for another walk in Mabira now that the axe no longer hangs over so much rare and beautiful wildlife.”
A study by NatureUganda, a conservation group, showed that the financial benefits of protecting the forest, which covers 30,000 hectares (74,000 acres), and encouraging eco-tourism vastly outstripped the potential of biofuel crops.
Other parts of Uganda were much more suitable for sugar cane crops. The commercial value of tourism and carbon capture in Mabira was estimated at more than $316 million (£154 million) a year whereas sugar cane production would yield a maximum of 35,784 tonnes over three years and be worth less than $20 million.
Eco-tourism in Uganda is the country’s second-biggest magnet for foreign currency and the Mabira Forest Reserve brings in 62 per cent of income from trips to forest reserves.
Achilles Byaruhanga, executive director of NatureUganda, said: “The economy of Uganda depends on the country’s environmental health. Agriculture, tourism and fisheries are core to our wellbeing, making environmental protection an overriding factor in our development.”
The report identified the forest as an unspoilt haven for 300 species of birds and 200 types of trees and it highlighted the area’s importance for dozens of species, some of which are found nowhere else in the wild.
Grey-cheeked mangabeys, a type of monkey, are among the endangered creatures in the forest. Among the birds in the area are the rare Nahan’s francolin, Francolinus nahani, similar to the partridge, which has suffered serious declines because of deforestation and degradation of forest habitats, and small-scale hunting. Other bird species in Mabira include the great blue turaco, bluethroated roller, black-shouldered nightjar and blue-headed crested-flycatcher.
Destruction of the forest would have been regarded as a breach of an agreement between the Ugandan Government and the World Bank. In 2001 the World Bank agreed to help to finance the construction of a hydro-electric dam on the River Nile in return for a pledge to protect the forest.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Dear readers,
The sustainable development or environmental protection of natural habitats remain illusive in Uganda. As Dr Alfred Banya stated "it wasn't for the protest that ordinary Ugandans staged" the Mabira forest would have been choped down. The same UG government have fell down trees in the DRC jungles. The Abera Forest on the outskirt of Gulu town, is no more.
Freddy wod Omonya, London, UK
No, it's travel (solo, independent, always on a bike) that has forced me to that conclusion. The only real minimum impact way to address tourism is the Bhutanese approach - make it so damned expensive that only a few people can afford it.
Pete, China,
Ato Mengistu Wondafrash should not be applauding the Uganda Government. The Government was quite adamant about allocating this land to Mehta if it wasn't for the protest that ordinary Ugandans staged. I am also intrigued by the comment in the article that 'other parts of Uganda are more suitable' for sugar cane growing. If this is reference to Northern Uganda (Amuru in particular) then it is absolutely wrong as this is not an undertaking suitable or wanted by the people whose land has been targetted.
alfred banya, london, UK
Pete from China, you are completely wrong. 'Travel broadens the mind' is usually an accurate saying but, I'm afraid seemingly wrong in your case. Eco-tourism does far more good than harm and helps both wildlife and local people - I have seen and experienced this for myself. If people realise that they are better off, both financially and practically through eco-tourism then so be it. The destruction of the world's forests by man is the biggest contributor to global warming.
Common sense has prevailed in Uganda, I think.
FJ, Quito, Ecuador
Forgive my cynicism, but in the longer term 'eco-tourism' is merely a sop to salve the consciences of the middle classes that indulge in it. How do they get to their eco-tourist destination? Who is being deprived of locally scarce resources to enable them to stay there in the comfort they demand? Alternatively, how are the goodies they 'need' being transported to the area? And what cultural damage is being caused by their presence?
Pete, China,
My gloomy view of the human race and its headlong rush to kill its own planet, may have to be revised, if action like this becomes widespread!. Bravo for common sense!
Michael, Birmingham, England
This is fantastic news. Hopefully other countries will take note, especially those the Amazon runs through. Biofuel is a poor choice for alternative fuel for many reasons, not least of which that people cut down trees to grow it, thus reducing the number of trees available to absorb carbon emissions. The other story on this site about the development of a hydrogen fueled car and a better hybrid that is more electrically powered shows that biofuels are not really needed. They are another desperate attempt by car companies to maintain standard combustion engines, with all their myriad parts that cost so much to maintain and replace, and to keep the oil industry going.
Kaye, WEllington, New Zealand