Bronwen Maddox: World Briefing
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
When the results of Zimbabwe’s elections come in, Britain will have a chance to help the shattered country more actively than it has done so far – and it will have no excuse for not doing so.
If, by some scarcely believable feat, the opposition party has managed – for all the intimidation and vote-rigging – to prise President Mugabe from his 28-year rule, then Britain will be able to pour in millions of pounds of aid. That decision is easy.
But if Mugabe has clung on by rigging the vote, despite reports that the opposition had won by a long way, then it will be time for Britain to speak up much more noisily than it has done, shaking off the inhibitions that it has felt perhaps too keenly because of its colonial past.
Britain has chosen to keep quieter than it might have done as Mugabe took Zimbabwe from stability and prosperity into poverty and violence, with the lowest life expectancy in the world and one of the highest rates of Aids infection. It has been inhibited by its past role as the colonial ruler of Zimbabwe, then Rhodesia, until 1980, and Mugabe’s success since then in portraying Britain as the would-be oppressor. When Britain criticised him, he could use the “evidence” of British colonialism to stir up his supporters at home, and to rally other African leaders to his cause.
Tom Porteous, the UK director of Human Rights Watch, the research and lobby group, argues that Britain “made the right decision, for once” in not being more confrontational, because it would have been counter-productive. He added that Human Rights Watch was “all for people speaking out about human rights abuses. But Britain made its position [on Mugabe] very clear, and it’s also clear that when it did raise its voice, that was presented as a colonial voice by Mugabe.”
Raising Britain’s voice, in this case, might mean trying to drum up support against Mugabe in the United Nations, and shutting the British High Commission in Zimbabwe. But Britain has wanted to keep a lower profile partly, officials say, to protect those with British connections living in Zimbabwe. The careful line of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has been that it supports “effective and well-managed land reform”, although Mugabe’s compulsory seizure of white-owned farms has taken the country into violence and near-starvation, as the output from the farms of this once hugely productive country collapsed.
Instead, Britain has tried to work quietly through the United Nations, and has lobbied South Africa in a near-futile bid to persuade President Mbeki to put pressure on Mugabe. Yesterday Gordon Brown telephoned Kofi Annan, the former UN Secretary-General, and Mbeki.
For all the careful restraint of this policy down the years, there must be a sense that Britain could have done more at least in expressing its outrage in the past few years as Zimbabwe’s economic crisis accelerated. There surely comes a time when the disaster is so huge and so inescapable that it punctures the claims that any criticism is merely a ghostly echo of the spirit of 30 years ago.
These elections are surely that turning point. Even Mugabe’s supporters – even Mbeki – have to acknowledge the straits the country is in. If there are signs that Mugabe has rigged the election result, then no sense of colonial past should inhibit Britain from calling loudly for other countries to club together against him.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sorry Terry Walker but your views are flawed. The Africans had their own system of governance. When the Europeans came,
in South Africa, Zimbabwe and other African countries, the entire economy was based on serving a minority. Outside cities, the ordinary Africans were mere slaves to the ruling imperialists. Now the media calls Mugabes land distribution 'a land grab' when it was in fact the 'poor' white farmers who did the grabbing, illegaly by forcing the indigenous poplation of f the land. At the first hint of democratic they became British and ran home. And to cap it all they wanted compensation ! Think again Mr Walker
Aftab Jeevanjee, Chichester, UK
Dear sir
The recent events in Zimbabwe have the shown most of the British media and the government at its hypocritical and racist best.
The reasons for Mr Mugabe's distaste and contempt for anything British has recently been made public. His dealings and pleas the the establishment were met by racism and the racist immigration policy, which by the way still operates unchanged.
It wasnt long ago that the peopleof Zimbabwe had no democratic vote and no say whatever in their country. Little has changed, maybe, but I do not recall any vilification by any section of the media of Ian smith and his fascist party who were hardly a role model of democracy. Nor did I hear anything from the then Prime Minister while mr Mugabe and his many compatriots were languishing in prison or exile for daring to ask for the right to vote.
yours sincerely
Aftab Jeevanjee
Aftab Jeevanjee, Chichester, UK
Britain should have nothing to do with Zimbabwe. Africans can deal with this mess to which is helped create.
Ian, Brisbane, Australia
Interesting, indeed, all this talk about what has happened in Zimbabwe under Mugabe. Remember how he came to power? So can anyone other than Polyanna really be surprised at what has transpired since? Look at what has happened all around subSaharan Africa since the 1960s. Why should Zimbabe be noticably different?
South Africa will be next to be run into the ground. Just give it another couple of decades.
It is time for the European nations and the United States to butt out of how Africans run Africa. Most colonial powers, and particularly Britain, when they departed, left their former colonies, to one extent or another, with reasonably good infrastructure, a fair legal system, and an educated elite. Now it is long past the time to let the Africans run their countries as they see fit, and for Europeans and Americans to stop wringing their hands about, and trying to influence, the internal political affairs of the African nations.
Terry L. Walker , Ladson, SC / USA
"Britain must find it's voice in Zimbabwe" Hmmmm. Do you mean in the same way that the British found their voice in not only Zimbabwe, but also the other countries that we have left in a mess. Britain should mind it's own business unless, and only unless, it is going to help financially with no conditions.
Everything that we touch goes sour. This is because we only touch a country if we can profit from it. Young countries must be allowed to grow up, making their mistakes on the way - just like children. Old countries should not be so convinced that their way is the best way.
Feed them, build factories, certainly but don't tell them how to live their lives, or put one of our puppets in power.
Nick, Leicestershire, I understand your point of view but those days are gone. Now we just pretend to help in order to take what we want.
I only need one word to finish, "Iraq".
Marc, Paris,
It has been hard for the U.K. 'to do more' when Mugabe has had no condemnation and, in many cases, open support from neighboring countries' leaders who were either as corrupt as him, or were not, but still supported him.
Bill Atkins, Rehoboth Beach, USA
Whether a country whose electoral system has been redesigned for easy riggability should have anything to say to Zimbabwe about the conduct of its elections is another matter.
As long as the British electoral system allows me to invent dozens of non-existent flatmates and put them on the electoral roll, I think we need to keep quiet about electoral malpractice.
Antonia Harper, Slough,
We are told that the matter lies in the hands of the most senior army officers who are the only people holding the power to direct a change in this election. I would argue that those army officers can be approached on the basis of losing their international status if they continue to support such a blatantly obvious fraud. The most obvious pressure can be brought by the likes of the most senior people in Western military academies, standing up to tell these army officers, they will be shunned by their ilk outside their borders. That no individual of any military status will evermore deal with them in any way. Another idea would be for these same military institutions to deliver the final acceptance for any smaller nation's military to call themselves, for example, "General". That without such affirmation of the basic principles of justice in their nations, their military will have no status outside of their borders. It is the status of the title "General" these military hold most dear.
Chris Coles, Medstead, Alton, United Kingdom
Time for Britain to speak up? Are you kidding? It has LONG been time for Britain, and the rest of the Western world, to "speak up."
Watching the white people of Europe and America dither, temporize, and make excuses for Mugabe and his henchmen is the most shameful thing I have ever seen. They would literally rather see Mugabe kill, torture and destroy a once idyllic nation rather than admit they were wrong in agitating for the end of Rhodesia.
When the history of these times are written Ms. Maddox, it will be you and your friends in the press who will be held to account for your complicity in Mugabe's reign of terror. You are complicit because you and your lefty press brethern refused to hold Mugabe to account for his actions.
Zimbabwe is dead now, it's too late to pretend to be concerned.
-Ken
Ken, Greensboro, nc
If, and it is a big IF that Mugabe and his party are overturned at this election does not mean that Britain should pour in millions of Aid. Granted that certain help will be needed to put that country back together but the best way is to invite the farmers evicted from their farms to come back and help rebuild the agricultural sector so that the country can first feed itself. We've been down the Aid road to Africa many times over the past 40 odd years and it has been a disaster, please don't repeat the mistakes of the past whereby Swiss bank accounts are swelled while the common man begs!
It will time to call on all the old Africa hands to help with this disaster inherited by Mugabe.
Colin Hills, Stuttgart, Germany
I'm British and have never felt ashamed of our colonial past. It might have been oppressive, but almost no-one who is alive now was alive in its hey-day, so it is time for us to stop being guilty.
If I had my way we would have invaded Zimbabwe, kicked Mugabe out and set up a decent government years ago. Britain is no longer colonial and going by his human rights abuses, such a move is completely justified.
To be honest even we were still colonial, it would a justified move. British Colonialism may have been oppressive, but we did a better job of running Zimbabwe than Mugabe is doing.
Nick, Leicestershire, England
The british should never have helped a terrorrist government obtain power.Now they must speak up against it and help bring it down.Mugabe is rigging the vote,again,and he is going to get away with it.What can an unarmed starving man do against the beast that is Mugabes army.The people are broken,and any form of resistnce will be crushed immediately,the people of Zimbabwe are to afraid,do you blame them?The british need to deal with the situation immediately,the whole affair is there fault,they should not have helped the government get into power in the first place.Ian smith was doing a great job ,why did they help to get him kicked out?
Garth Bufe, Durban, South Africa
Go Gerna; that's telling them.
GK, Calgary, Canada
One question that jumps to mind is will this situation emulate what occured in Kenya Earlier this year?
Britain missed Several Opportunites to assist Zimbabwe. And President Mugabe and his pride allowed for the situation to get worse without asking for any assistance at all.
Scott Morgan, Farmville, Virginia USA
I agree 100% with Gerna Van Rooyen. Zimbabwe/Rhodesia would be a great country for all if the British under Harold Wilson had left Ian Smith in control and had, like the USA now after 9/11, condemned terrorism in all its forms for it has now been proven, as it was stated at the time, that the freedom fighters were all power grabbers without any skills except murder and propaganda. Maggie Thatcher knew this and had the guts to say so at the time. Now South Africa has to go through the same problems. My children still live in SA, but at least my eldest one can speak Chinese... And she is a hot-shot with a pistol, and essential quality in the new SA.
And we thought Marxism was dead after its many failures.
B J Deller, Marbella, Spain
I am a SA immigrating to the UK, honoured to call the UK my new country and proud of the British way of life. You were a colonial EMPIRE, STOP being ashamed of the fact. Does France and Spain still feel guilty about it? Don't think so! SA is being overrun by a tsunami of crime, corruption and injustice, affecting all races and cultures - 25% of Zim population is illegally in SA and contributing to the crime as a matter of survival. Now don't go "poor things" - that empathy goes out of the window when your wife is raped in front of you during a robbery with a cellphone the only loot, or your son being shot and killed for his old Toyota. I think your misplaced guilt over colonialism has done more damage thatn the actual act of colonialising has ever done, Understand that Mbeki is no longer ruling SA and loyalty prevented him from taking a stronger stance on ZIM. Your PC actions has left a country in ruins, with little hope of recovery and a huge impact on SA... and the UK?
Gerna van Rooyen, Pretoria , SA
The UK has never been a reliable partner in Zimbabwe. I'm a Zimbabwean, my goal - Even if Tsvangarai wins, is to keep the Britons out!!! You are increasingly not a fit in our modern Country with indegenisation aspirations. We have white Rhodesians who we have never come to like..Get out and keep out...
Zvo, Harara/Zim,