Bernard Lagan in Sydney
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks

The table was set. Laptop screens flickered in the cabin and mobile phones and sunglasses were on the chart table in front of the empty chairs. But there was no crew.
“It’s almost like they just stepped off the boat,” said Trevor Wilson, pilot of the rescue helicopter sent to investigate after the catamaran was spotted drifting off the Queensland coast.
The discovery of the Kaz 11 without her three-man crew has mystified Australian rescue teams. Other than a ripped sail, everything seemed perfectly normal. The engine idled in neutral and the marine radio was on. Three wallets were on the table.
Her emergency equipment, including life jackets and the emergency locator beacon, appeared not to have been touched. The dinghy was still lashed to the hull.
By late yesterday 12 aircraft and four vessels were searching 4,000sq nautical miles for the three men who set out on Sunday from Airlie Beach in North Queensland. An Australian Army Black Hawk helicopter was expected to join the search today.
The missing yachtsmen were named locally as Derek Batten, 56, the skipper, and his neighbours Peter and James Tunstead, brothers aged 69 and 63, from Perth, Western Australia. Police would not confirm their identities.
The men bought the 40ft catamaran at Airlie Beach last week and planned to sail north and west around Australia’s vast northern coast to the other side of the continent.
Keryn Grey, James Tunstead’s daughter, said that the family was hoping that the men were in a dinghy and that the catamaran drifted away. “We are hoping that they forgot to anchor it \ and it’s drifted off, the three idiots, and \ not been able to get back to it,” she said.
Ms Grey said that the trip was supposed to take six to eight weeks. “They were just going to stop every night, anchor close to shore all the way back around the top and down the coast,” she said. “It was going to be their trip of a lifetime.”
The Kaz 11 was spotted by a coastal patrol aircraft on Wednesday 200km (125 miles) north of her departure point, drifting in calm seas. Because the patrol could not make radio contact with the catamaran or see anybody aboard, a rescue helicopter was sent out on Thursday and a crewman winched down.
By chance, a television crew from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation was on the helicopter making a documentary about the rescuers’ work. Their footage was broadcast last night. The director, Jan Catoni, said: “There was concern for the safety of the rescue officer who was winched down because he was boarding a vessel by himself. We had no sense of what he might find.”
Footage shows him emerging from the cabin eventually with his arms outstretched and palms turned upward to indicate that nobody was aboard.
John Hall, a spokesman for the Queensland sea rescue service, said: “It was a little eerie because all the personal effects of the crew were still there. There were sunglasses on the table, two laptop computers set up and running. And the table had obviously been prepared for a meal.”
Last night the catamaran was being compared with the Mary Celeste, the brig found drifting off Portugal in 1872. The ship was in good condition and the disappearance of her ten crew and passengers has never been explained.
This time around, rescuers will have more clues to work on. The Queensland rescue organisation hopes that information stored within the Global Positioning System, phones and computers will make it possible to plot the movements of the Kaz 11 after she left Airlie Beach. This would enable them to narrow the search area.
The weather conditions at the time of departure from Airlie Beach on Sunday were poor and deteriorating. The wind was 30 knots and the waves were rising.
However, Greg Connor, a forecaster with the Bureau of Meteorology, said that the men would have faced moderate southeasterly winds of about 35 kph (22mph), typical weather for this time of year.
“It would have been excellent sailing conditions,” he said. “There’s no reason to believe this is a weather-related incident.”
There were no plausible theories last night to explain why the crew might have disappeared.
Has history repeated itself?
— The Mary Celeste was found drifting off the Portuguese coast by the Dei Gratia on December 5, 1872. It was waterlogged but intact, with nine barrels of industrial alcohol empty and the lifeboat missing
— The tale was popularised by Arthur Conan Doyle, who renamed her Marie Celeste and added details since taken for fact, such as the discovery of still-warm food
— Theories to explain the crew’s disappearance:
— Alcohol leaked into the hold and, smelling the fumes, the crew fled, believing that the ship was set to explode
— The ship hit a waterspout which alarmed the crew and induced them to flee
— A fungus growing on the ship’s bread caused the crew to hallucinate and go mad
— A 1965 episode of Dr Who suggests the disappearance was caused by Daleks
— Abel Fosdyk, who claimed to have been a stowaway, said that to resolve an argument about how fast a fully-clothed man could swim, three of the crew jumped in, only to be eaten by sharks. The rest rushed to an observation platform, which collapsed under their weight
Source: maryceleste.net, thestraightdope.com
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think some one come in took them as there slaves in that they were still alive but not now i think.
Ferry, Excelsior springs , mo
wind damedge sails usually break and tear to or from the edge in a strip, these sails look like they are broken in two places like something has been forced through that is not wind. I agree about the fenders you usually pull them out the water, so as not to lose them. the Fenders are sett for going along side a larger vessel.
max, london, uk
Have a look at the fenders tied to the side of the boat. Even the most sloppy of sailors would not have left the fenders still tied to the boat at sea unless they had tied up voluntary to another vessel. Also the foward fender is tied up higher indicating it may have been tied up to a larger vessel i.e. higher out of the water. The motor was idling in neutral which could point to the fact that the crew were willing to tie up to another vessel. The windy weather at the time does not seem to have upset the dining table and its contents i.e. knives and forks and computers, thats if they were left on the table. To me it looks like the crew departed the boat quickly and unexpectedly to leave everything in place.
John Miller, Newcastle , NSW Austalia
I think it's strange that the wallets were left on the table,as though they were suppose to be found. I think it's a hoax,an expensive one at that. I hope I'm wrong.
Nancy, Stafford, Stafford / Virginia
They might have all gone for a quick swim before dinner, as you do, only to become dinner to a shark or six, in some macabre manner that defies thinking.
Rob Riches, Croydon, UK
The crew members must have dissappeared around midday on Monday or Tuesday. This is suggested by the facts that: (a) they were about to have a meal meaning it would be around a meal time (b) there were sunglasses and no cabin lights on so the crew members would not have dissappeared around dinner time.
There is a torn sail. Maybe all three rushed on deck to secure the sail and one of the brothers fell overboard, the other person jumped in to save the first brother and then not wanting to loose his brother, the second brother jumped in the ocean.
Aurore, Guildford, UK
It's highly ridiculous and insensitive to suggest that "they were abducted by aliens". This is not a joke. Three men are missing. The only comment this reader in the "have you say" section can muster is the abduction of the crew by aliens. There are websites you know for weird alien lovers and general weirdos. Post your abduction theory on those and spare us all. Insenstive and pathetic. Anyway, their families are going through hell. In all likelyhood, it sounds as though they were swept aboard. Let's hope however that there is another explanation. Unfortunately the GPS seems to indicate they probably abandoned ship last Sunday so chances of finding them now are slim.
a hughes, Canberra, Australia
Surely pirates would have taken the laptops and other possesions.
The only sensible explanation is that one of them got rather peckish and really wanted a packet of crisps. He convinced the other two that they needed to go to the shops for more supplies. They agreed, they quite fancied a penny-lick themselves.
Off they popped down to the local cornershop.
As they sank down they realised their terrible mistake.
Patrick, Manchester, UK
They landed on a beech, got off for a brief moment for what ever reason and the boat, still rigged, drifted off and they are now stuck there?
Neil , KL, Malaysia
The only possible explanation is that they were abducted by aliens.
Loui, Bideford, UK
Yes... The event also could be happened long before when still strong winds where going on since it seems that a riff has been taken but then you don't anchor in rough weather for lunch...
Another thing is that they must have been in a run or very close with the wind in their starborad quarter since both sails are set at port.
Finaly, the fenders are set on the port side as if they were expecting being boarded. Could be piracy and someone disable the genoa to stop them?
Tino, St. Leonards-on-Sea, UK
This happening is nothing unusual in the Northwest coast of Spain. "Sunday sailors" panic and abandon ship too much too soon. Whatever did shred the genoa made them think that it was going to blow up the vessel (A low flight light aircraft?) and they jump into the sea head on then -with the main sail still on and the boat making way- there is no way you can catch the boat by swimming. Then, sadly, the sharks did the rest. For the sails' setting -or what it seems to be in the picture- they were in a run. I do sorry for their sister but you don't anchor while in a run... but the idle engine means that they were to do it for lunch and they must have been all on deck to recover the sails and set the bow roller to drop the anchor when the event took place whatever it was. This is what I think it "could" have happened.
Tino, St. Leonards-on-Sea, UK
they might of planned this for years, a way to leave there old life behind, and start over a new one, somewhere else,
bruce, dundee, uk
As the engine was idling and the sails were up, it might suggest that someone went overboard, a second crew member jumped over to assist the first, and the third person, who had brought the boat "back around" (ie started the engine to bring the boat back about) foolishly left the boat unattended or fell overboard (which drifted away) while assisting the first two. Sort of dumb, but possible - were they experienced sailors?.
Arthur Fink, Pitt Meadows, British Columbia, Canada