Bernard Lagan in Sydney
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Australia is to repeal laws that prevent it establishing a nuclear industry, paving the way for the adoption of atomic power and uranium enriching ventures.
John Howard, the Prime Minister, announced the move as Kevin Rudd, the opposition leader, convinced Labor’s national conference in Sydney to abandon its opposition to uranium exports and agree to new mines in the Outback.
Australia has 36 per cent of the world’s low-cost uranium reserves and is expected to become the world’s largest uranium exporter once new mines are built and existing ones expanded.
Mr Howard told a weekend conference of his Liberal Party that a 1999 law which bans nuclear power stations in Australia and constrains the expansion of its uranium mining industry was no longer compatible with the need to act on climate change. He said that Australia would need progressively to wind down its reliance on traditional coal-fired power stations and adopt nuclear power generation.
“Policies or political platforms that seek to constrain the development of a safe and reliable Australian uranium industry – and which rule out the possibility of climate-friendly nuclear energy – are not really serious about addressing climate change,” he said.
Mr Howard, who is expected to call a general election in the autumn, has long opposed the adoption of firm targets for the reduction of greenhouse emissions in Australia. He said that he would not “adopt a European solution for an Australian problem”.
The timing of the announcement was widely seen as calculated to embarrass Labor, which went through a fractious debate before lifting its opposition to uranium mines after 23 years.
Opposition to the move was led by Peter Garrett, the party’s environment spokesman, a lawyer who was also the singer of the Midnight Oil rock group, whose hits included antinuclear songs.
Labor’s adoption of greenhouse gas reduction targets was ridiculed by Mr Howard, who said: “We should not, as Labor has done, pluck a target developed by the Europeans for European circumstances out of the air and say we’re going to commit to that.”
Mr Howard, who has in the past appeared to favour a national referendum on the building of nuclear power stations in Australia, said he believed that was no longer necessary because opinion polls had firmed in favour of the nuclear option.
He said that the Government would not build or own nuclear power stations. They would instead be owned by private power generation companies. The Government has set a target of having 25 nuclear reactors by 2050.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Mary Collins I believe you're unaware of the consequences if we use nuclear power. Yes it will reduce green house emissions but have you even considered how dangerous it could be? Radioactive matter emits radiation in three different forms; alpha, beta and gamma radiation. Alpha radiation is relatively safe, beta radiation is harder to stop but manageable but gamma radiation can cause changes in our DNA. However, radioactive matter has a half life meaning the matter remaining halves every year but never really goes away and maintains its hazardous state. Do you truly believe that its worth the risk?
jt, sydney, nsw
"Less than 30 people died and it happened in backward Russia." - This is not correct - it's just nonsense.
"The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) estimates 4,000 people died as a result of the explosion in reactor number four at the power plant in the Ukrainian town of Chernobyl on April 26, 1986."
The death toll from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster 20 years ago could be far higher than official estimates, with up to 93,000 extra cancer deaths worldwide, environmental group Greenpeace said on Tuesday, according to Reuters.
Based on research by the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, the report said that of the 2 billion people globally affected by the Chernobyl fallout, 270,000 will develop cancers as a result, of which 93,000 will prove fatal."
Would you live in 50km from Nuclear Power Station? Do you think a station can be placed in the middle of nowhere?
Where would cooling water, waste etc be going? We live in unique country and make it polluted is easy.
Jeff, Sydney, NSW
Regarding the opinion polls in favour of the nuclear option. No-one has asked Me or any one I know for our opinions. We are NOT in favour!!
Karrin Schoen, darwin, NT
I applaud the Government in making an intelligent decision based on facts rather than the emotional ravings of tree huggers. We should have embraced nuclear power long ago.
Mary Collins, adelaide, australia/sa
Should Australia embrace nuclear energy?
I myself personally think that nuclear is the way to go. Its clean and provides abundant energy. It's the only serious alternative to coal. We can't run rapidly growing cities on sunshine and breezes.
Solar panels use nasty chemicals in their construction and cost way too much. Not only that but they have to be replaced every 20 years. Wind turbines chop up birds and are ugly. Neither are reliable as the sun doesn't shine at night and the wind is haphazard at best.
Those who decry nuclear power always refer to Chernobyl. An accident which took place over 20 years ago. Less than 30 people died and it happened in backward Russia. Every year over 30,000 people die from coal burning. Uranium exists in coal beds and gets burned up then pumped into our atmosphere. Not stored safely like with reactors. Over a million people die each year from cars. Nobody died from nuclear energy.
Wayne Smith, Brisbane, Australia/QLD
Recent events in Virginia Tech have further proven grounds for small arms control...
Why should it be any different for nuclear weapons? Australia can not conscionably export uranium to the world without taking some responsibility for its usage.
This is the 'easy fix' that pollies like to use so often. Grab a few votes, but don't take a strong stand on anything.
This is a dark day for Australia.
Simon Bossell, Sydney, NSW
There is no safe way to secure nuclear reactor waste so
why is the Federal Govt going ahead with setting things up
for nuclear power plants. There will be arguments to where
the plants will be sited so most politicians will have to be
against having one sited in their electorate.I myself am
opposed to them. We need to be looking at clean
technologies such as wind, solar and clean coal if its
feasible.
J. Linsley, Old Bar, NSW Australia