Jeremy Page in Delhi
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
India has officially informed the United States that it has frozen a nuclear deal that was supposed to herald a strategic alliance between the biggest democracy in the world and the richest.
Manmohan Singh, the Prime Minister, telephoned President Bush on Monday night to tell him that the deal had run into difficulties because of opposition from his communist allies. “The Prime Minister explained to President Bush that difficulties have arisen with respect to operationalisation of the India-US civil nuclear co-operation agreement,” the Indian Government said.
The Americans said that they would continue to work on the deal but analysts and diplomats said it would not be ready for approval by the US Congress before the end of the Bush Administration. “It’s over. The Americans are distraught,” one Western diplomat told The Times. “The embassy has been working on little else for two years.” The deal’s failure is a huge embarrassment for Mr Singh, who gave it his personal backing, and for Mr Bush, who was hoping it would be a foreign policy success.
The agreement, announced with a fanfare last year, would have allowed India to import US nuclear fuel and technology for the first time in 30 years, easing its energy shortage and binding it closer to Washington. India — which leant towards the Soviet Union during the Cold War — would have had to open some of its nuclear facilities to international inspections. The communists who back India’s ruling coalition said that the deal would make India subservient to US interests. They threatened to withdraw their support, forcing early elections if the Government triggered the deal by opening negotiations with the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Mr Singh appeared determined to call the communists’ bluff until Friday, when he backtracked and said that his priority was to see out the Government’s term, which ends in 2009.
Sources in his Congress Party, which leads the ruling coalition, said that party pollsters had balked at the prospect of elections early next year.
The Government had aimed to conclude the IAEA pact by the end of this month so it could win approval from the Nuclear Suppliers Group in time for the US Congress to endorse the deal before the end of the year.
Any later would mean that a lame-duck Bush Administration would struggle to get the deal through a hostile Congress preoccupied with the presidential election. Some US politicians have said that it undermined efforts to combat the spread of nuclear weapons. Others fear it would allow India to divert nuclear materials, beginning an atomic arms race in Asia.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sir,
"Shame on you communists, for once place country higher than your greedy selves."
Not a hint of irony in that statement then? I suppose India could always pick and choose its partners, playing off the West against the Russians. Remember the Cold war anyone.
SC, London, United Kingdom
At the moment the failed deal looks like a disaster, but in the long run the decision was for the best. India retains its freedom of action. It was a Faustian pact at the outset. The results of which would have been just what the US wanted, political and economic subordination. That would have been the long term price for short term rewards.
gary, London,
Shame on you communists, for once place country higher than your greedy selves.
Ashish, Milton Keynes, England
It was CTBT in another form....u test and the deal and nuclear technology supplies from the US would have been off....that is why the US was keener than India to sign the deal...
Uday, Pune, India
SK, just a little question if you don't mind in relation to India becoming subservient to the US.
What happens when after setting up this deal and India moves it's infrastructure to depend on the alliance, if the US suddenly cuts the deal due to either economic or national defence reasons (sudden terrorist fears), change of sympathisers in Washington, etc? Would India not be devastated when a main power resources vanishes? Would they not then be willing to cut more US friendly deals to keep the alliance.
I'm not attacking or making claims, I really don't know much about the background, it was just a quick analysis of the article at hand.
Damien, Adelaide, Australia
The communists should be kicked out of India..75 MP's holding the entire country to ransom. India's nuclear security will not be compromised by a civil deal. US clearly realises that fact that India needs its nuclear deterrant against a islamist regime in Pakistan and a communist regime in China. The communists want to take India back to the stone age. I feel the next thing on Prakash Karat's agenda would be to hand over Arunachal and Sikkim to China. I havent seen the communists take part in any positive work in India except pull the government down on smaller issues. The communists have played on the fear of the congress, a mid term election would mean another hung parliament with congress losing its share to the BJP. The Hon'ble Prime Minister perhaps should put the countrie's interest above all and go ahead with the elections and let the people decide if they want the nuclear deal or not. Its for the people to decide not any party
Rahul Sachdeva, New Delhi ,
Lets go to the Supreme Court and file a PIL asking why the government is going to deny power generation
Rahul Sachdeva, New Delhi ,
It's a mistake to say that the problem has just appeared. India is now paying the price for flouting the non-proliferation treaty. All that has happened now is that the price of their get out of jail free card turns out to be too high for Indian nationalists to accept.
It's worth thinking about this. After thirty years, India is still unwilling to accept the international inspection other NPT members routinely accept, even though inspections came with a considerable sweetener. Why is that?
jon livesey, Sunnyvale, CA/US
The historic arrogance of congress was so pervalent that they never took an important opposition party namely BJP/NDA into confidence. The Participant of Opposition was so marginalized that they almost had a year long vactions seemingly.... Communists, on the other hand, went into wait and watch moment fore 2 yrs, before showing their cards... Congress was cruising smoothly on the surface, not realizing at any time, that beneath this smooth surface, there was a tsuanmi wave.. All Congress had to do was make this an India's issue, and not party pacific.. Afterall, It was BJP which opened the door for discussion with USA... Now Congress is gonna cruise like a lame duck ruling party until fiscal yr budget of 2008-09 before announcing fresh election for November-december 2008... This is a pathetic colonial party, Gandhi emphatically called for its total destruction right after independence....
Kumar, NYC , USA
The claim by the Communists that the deal would make India subservient to the US is farcical. The deal makes the country a de facto nuclear power with the chance to finally fix the decrepit power generation situation - thereby accelerating economic growth and raising millions out of poverty.
If anything, the Communists have proven themselves to be subservient to their ultimate paymasters - the politburo in Beijing.
Congratulations Dr. Singh & Mr. Basu, you have condemned your people to needless penury.
SK, London, UK
Shame - The people of India would have really benefited from the power....
V Singh, Southampton, UK