Jeremy Page in Delhi
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
India has officially informed the United States that it has frozen a nuclear deal that was supposed to herald a strategic alliance between the biggest democracy in the world and the richest.
Manmohan Singh, the Prime Minister, telephoned President Bush on Monday night to tell him that the deal had run into difficulties because of opposition from his communist allies. “The Prime Minister explained to President Bush that difficulties have arisen with respect to operationalisation of the India-US civil nuclear co-operation agreement,” the Indian Government said.
The Americans said that they would continue to work on the deal but analysts and diplomats said it would not be ready for approval by the US Congress before the end of the Bush Administration. “It’s over. The Americans are distraught,” one Western diplomat told The Times. “The embassy has been working on little else for two years.” The deal’s failure is a huge embarrassment for Mr Singh, who gave it his personal backing, and for Mr Bush, who was hoping it would be a foreign policy success.
The agreement, announced with a fanfare last year, would have allowed India to import US nuclear fuel and technology for the first time in 30 years, easing its energy shortage and binding it closer to Washington. India — which leant towards the Soviet Union during the Cold War — would have had to open some of its nuclear facilities to international inspections. The communists who back India’s ruling coalition said that the deal would make India subservient to US interests. They threatened to withdraw their support, forcing early elections if the Government triggered the deal by opening negotiations with the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Mr Singh appeared determined to call the communists’ bluff until Friday, when he backtracked and said that his priority was to see out the Government’s term, which ends in 2009.
Sources in his Congress Party, which leads the ruling coalition, said that party pollsters had balked at the prospect of elections early next year.
The Government had aimed to conclude the IAEA pact by the end of this month so it could win approval from the Nuclear Suppliers Group in time for the US Congress to endorse the deal before the end of the year.
Any later would mean that a lame-duck Bush Administration would struggle to get the deal through a hostile Congress preoccupied with the presidential election. Some US politicians have said that it undermined efforts to combat the spread of nuclear weapons. Others fear it would allow India to divert nuclear materials, beginning an atomic arms race in Asia.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sir,
"Shame on you communists, for once place country higher than your greedy selves."
Not a hint of irony in that statement then? I suppose India could always pick and choose its partners, playing off the West against the Russians. Remember the Cold war anyone.
SC, London, United Kingdom
At the moment the failed deal looks like a disaster, but in the long run the decision was for the best. India retains its freedom of action. It was a Faustian pact at the outset. The results of which would have been just what the US wanted, political and economic subordination. That would have been the long term price for short term rewards.
gary, London,
Shame on you communists, for once place country higher than your greedy selves.
Ashish, Milton Keynes, England
It was CTBT in another form....u test and the deal and nuclear technology supplies from the US would have been off....that is why the US was keener than India to sign the deal...
Uday, Pune, India
SK, just a little question if you don't mind in relation to India becoming subservient to the US.
What happens when after setting up this deal and India moves it's infrastructure to depend on the alliance, if the US suddenly cuts the deal due to either economic or national defence reasons (sudden terrorist fears), change of sympathisers in Washington, etc? Would India not be devastated when a main power resources vanishes? Would they not then be willing to cut more US friendly deals to keep the alliance.
I'm not attacking or making claims, I really don't know much about the background, it was just a quick analysis of the article at hand.
Damien, Adelaide, Australia
The communists should be kicked out of India..75 MP's holding the entire country to ransom. India's nuclear security will not be compromised by a civil deal. US clearly realises that fact that India needs its nuclear deterrant against a islamist regime in Pakistan and a communist regime in China. The communists want to take India back to the stone age. I feel the next thing on Prakash Karat's agenda would be to hand over Arunachal and Sikkim to China. I havent seen the communists take part in any positive work in India except pull the government down on smaller issues. The communists have played on the fear of the congress, a mid term election would mean another hung parliament with congress losing its share to the BJP. The Hon'ble Prime Minister perhaps should put the countrie's interest above all and go ahead with the elections and let the people decide if they want the nuclear deal or not. Its for the people to decide not any party
Rahul Sachdeva, New Delhi ,
Lets go to the Supreme Court and file a PIL asking why the government is going to deny power generation
Rahul Sachdeva, New Delhi ,
It's a mistake to say that the problem has just appeared. India is now paying the price for flouting the non-proliferation treaty. All that has happened now is that the price of their get out of jail free card turns out to be too high for Indian nationalists to accept.
It's worth thinking about this. After thirty years, India is still unwilling to accept the international inspection other NPT members routinely accept, even though inspections came with a considerable sweetener. Why is that?
jon livesey, Sunnyvale, CA/US
The historic arrogance of congress was so pervalent that they never took an important opposition party namely BJP/NDA into confidence. The Participant of Opposition was so marginalized that they almost had a year long vactions seemingly.... Communists, on the other hand, went into wait and watch moment fore 2 yrs, before showing their cards... Congress was cruising smoothly on the surface, not realizing at any time, that beneath this smooth surface, there was a tsuanmi wave.. All Congress had to do was make this an India's issue, and not party pacific.. Afterall, It was BJP which opened the door for discussion with USA... Now Congress is gonna cruise like a lame duck ruling party until fiscal yr budget of 2008-09 before announcing fresh election for November-december 2008... This is a pathetic colonial party, Gandhi emphatically called for its total destruction right after independence....
Kumar, NYC , USA
The claim by the Communists that the deal would make India subservient to the US is farcical. The deal makes the country a de facto nuclear power with the chance to finally fix the decrepit power generation situation - thereby accelerating economic growth and raising millions out of poverty.
If anything, the Communists have proven themselves to be subservient to their ultimate paymasters - the politburo in Beijing.
Congratulations Dr. Singh & Mr. Basu, you have condemned your people to needless penury.
SK, London, UK
Shame - The people of India would have really benefited from the power....
V Singh, Southampton, UK