Alexi Mostrous
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

JK Rowling has warned that “the floodgates will open” on unauthorised versions of her books if a judge allows the publication of a Harry Potter encyclopaedia.
The British author was testifying at the Manhattan federal court, which she is asking to block publication of The Harry Potter Lexicon, a guide to the characters, places and spells in her novels.
Returning to the witness stand on the last day of a three day trial, Ms Rowling said: “I believe the floodgates will open. Are we the owners of our own work?”
The offending reference guide was written by Steven Vander Ark, a 50-year-old former middle school librarian who compiled the material from a website by the same name that he had been operating for years.
RDR Books, the small publisher that persuaded Mr Vander Ark to put material from the website into print, has argued that it is no different than any other reference guide and should be allowed to go to press without interference.
Ms Rowling said she was “vehemently anti-censorship" and generally supportive of the right of other authors to write books about her novels. But she said Mr Vander Ark had “plundered her prose and merely reprinted it in an A-to-Z format”.
In a statement, the multi-millionaire author said that the book had overstepped a boundary.
“Authors have a right to protect their works from misuse. Do I have fewer rights because many people read my books? If this book is published, it will open the floodgates for anyone to lift an author’s work and present it as their own.”
Robert Patterson Jr, the US district judge, asked Rowling whether she thought anyone would read the lexicon and its list of facts about the wizarding world for entertainment value.
“Honestly, no,” Rowling said. The good parts, she said, have simply been lifted from her own work.
“I think there are funny things in there, and I wrote them,” she said.
A decision in the case is not expected soon. It will be weeks before lawyers finish filing legal documents, and possibly longer before a verdict is reached. Judge Patterson is deciding the case, rather than a jury.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think she is right in saying that she doesnt want this book, I mean, who in thwe right mind wants all main parts without all the little bits that make the main what they are. I have been reading since they came out, and I like what I have read. Having a person spoil it ruins the fun in reading it.
Dustyne McLean, Bonney Lake, Washington
Strangely it seems that pages 2 & 3 of this report have simply been lifted from page 1! Perhaps the author of page 1 could seek similar recourse against pages 2 & 3 and have them deleted. There are interesting sentences on pages 2 & 3....but they were written on page 1. This will open floodgates for dozens of pages to be added, all lifting the work from page 1.
La Tosca, Lucca, Tuscany
I am in league with June Moriarty, who is who is 2 comments under me. Good luck Ms. Rowling. The Harry Potter books were great. I hope the judge decides in your favor.It was her imagination and hers alone that made up her books. No one elses!!!!! As for the comment made by Blake in clemson who was the first to comment I am going to use my freedom of speech and say screw you! good vs. evil has been around longer than that. yeah the lotr books were weitten in i think '53 but it doesnt mean she took anything from them! so take your "lot of nerve" and go back to the whole in the ground u crawled out of! no body has a right to take away work done from ANY BODY ELSE!!!
Angel, Indiana, The great United States of America
The sharing of information is the foundation of our society, information should be made freely avaliable and understandable to all.
J.K. Rowling will come out of this getting some royalties from the book's sales which, from all this publicity she's generated, will be another nice sum on her £500something million fortune.
Either way this is US law, which I darn't even begin to read in after all the publicised idiotic cases which seem to come out in the press.
tom, munich,
J.K. Rowling has every right to be alarmed about the infringment on her rights. Today people think they have license to take any creative work and rework it into their own view of the property. Witness the music industry's wholesale theft by people who think once something is public it belongs to them.
Harry Potter and his magical world were brought into being by Ms. Rowling's fantastic imagination and her gifted abilities as a writer. It is hers and hers alone to do with as she wishes. I side Ms. Rowling and wish her well in her case.
June Moriarty, West Hills, CA, USA
I support Ms. Rowling, she deserves it.. Nobody has the right to take her hard work away from her.
chris, haren, netherlands
Ms. Rowling has a lot of nerve complaining of plagiarism when anyone can see in her Potter works that her philosophical concepts of Good vs Evil are lifted wholesale from the works of JRR Tolkein and CS Lewis, and her evil creatures are thinly veiled replicas of those found in The Lord of the Rings. If Rowling is succesful in her suit, the estate of Tolkein should engage a barrister.
blake, clemson, USA/SC
Has much as I would like to keep reading about Harry Potter and his world I don't thinks it's fear for people to take adventage of the fact the Harry is done in the eyes of Ms. Rowling and no book is going to be the same because she is the original and that alone adds the spice to the story. Mr. Ark needs to do his own stuff not try to build from hers.
I support Ms. Rowling.
maria, Elkhart, IN, USA