GERMANS yesterday emerged stunned and confused from the premiere of the controversial film The Downfall which depicts in graphic detail the last days of Adolf Hitler.

The Nazi leader is shown as a tired, sometimes sympathetic man and as a good considerate boss with a tendency to shout too loud. It is a portrait that has prompted an excited debate in Germany about whether it is legitimate to show Hitler as a human being rather than as a monster.

“It went too far in making him human, there was no real explanation for his fanaticism,” said Hans Joachim Dribell, a 70-year-old retired engineer. He was speaking after a showing in Potsdamer Platz, only five minutes’ walk from Hitler’s Berlin bunker.

“If you show someone like this as a human then people might be tempted to forgive him as a human — after all, to err is human.”

But the strongest reaction of the cinema audience — some 300 at an afternoon showing — was not to the gentle portrayal of Hitler by Bruno Ganz but to the footage of Berlin under horrific Russian bombardment in the spring of 1945. Wounded German soldiers are shown screaming as their limbs are amputated in an underground shaft; German children fall to the ground, bullets in their heads.

The danger is not that this film, heavily promoted by the tabloid press, will make Germans love Hitler. Rather, it is that the film will feed into the national debate about Germans being allowed to commemorate and mourn their wartime victims.

“Some of the scenes were really repulsive and scary, it must have been disgusting for the Germans,” said MarieLouise Hellblau, a 14-year-old member of a school group from outside Berlin.

The film, in its search for German heroes outside Hitler’s bunker, muddles its history. The strongest “ordinary” German in the film is the character of Ernst Günther Schenck, who is disgusted by the drunkeness in the bunker as some orderlies lose their nerve. Yet the real Dr Schenck had been a nutritional expert for the SS and had experimented on 370 concentration camp inmates. Many died.

The narrative of the film is told through the eyes of a secretary, Traudl Junge, who admits that she was enchanted by the Nazi leader. Her memoirs are one of the main sources for the film yet they are often naive.

The confusion of victims with war criminals runs throughout the film and deepens the closer one comes to Hitler. Magda Goebbels, wife of the propaganda minister Joseph, is shown poisoning her children in their bunk beds. For the first time, in over half a century of Hitler films, she is shown to be in torment at the decision.

Many scenes are historically grounded, chronicled by the popular historian Joachim Fest who advised the film-makers, Bernd Eichinger and Oliver Hirschbiegel. But even excellent actors cannot rescue a script that leans too heavily on potted history and selfserving memoirs.

“It was not great what Hitler did,” said Marie-Louise, leaving the cinema into the Berlin sunlight. “He was a bit of a beast, wasn’t he?”

Explore World News

• World Agenda

• Iraq News

• US & Americas News

• Europe News

• Middle East News

• Afghanistan News

• Asia News

• Africa News

• Ireland News

Times Recommends

• 'Radio Rancid' is scourge of Obama
• French gulp as global warming alters wines
• Colton, the barefoot boy bandit, outfoxes sheriffs