Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Amalia Miller, 28, began investigating the price of motherhood because she and her friends were discussing the best time to have a baby.
Could it ruin careers to have children young? Would they be risking infertility by waiting too long?
Miller, an economist at the University of Virginia, had read Sylvia Hewlett’s much publicised book, Baby Hunger, about the regrets felt by childless career women and wondered whether there was a rational basis for their decision to put off motherhood.
She found that young university-educated mothers earned significantly less over their lifetimes than women who began their families as little as 12 months later. For unskilled workers the age of motherhood made no difference.
Miller’s work is in the tradition of her fellow economist Steven Levitt’s bestseller Freakonomics, focusing on real-life issues rather than fluctuations in the financial markets.
She discovered that a 24-year-old mother would earn roughly 10% less — right up to retirement — than a 25-year-old mother, while a 26-year-old would earn 10% less than a 27-year-old. The same applied to 29 and 30-year-old mothers and so forth.
Once women are on what Miller calls the “mommy track”, they tend to get sidelined by employers.
The 10% loss of earnings is remarkably consistent across Miller’s sample, taken from a study of more than 1,000 American women by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. The figure derives partly from the higher wages that women who delay motherhood earn for the rest of their lives and partly from the longer hours they tend to work on their return.
The benefits of delay appear to lessen among professional women in their thirties whose careers are often established. “More experience seems to provide more of a buffer and, if you are at a point where your wages are levelling off anyway, timing doesn’t matter so much,” Miller said.
It suggests that the optimum time for women to have children is around 30, the age which Hewlett also believes is the “least risky” course for women.
Miller is hesitant about identifying the perfect age for motherhood but Atara, her younger sister, has given considerable thought to the subject. She is 27 and a successful lawyer at a New York firm. Married for nearly five years, she is now pregnant with her first child.
One of the partners at her law office congratulated her on her timing. “It’s ideal. You’re young but in the perfect place career-wise,” he said.
Atara has been at the same firm for four years so her career is already on track. She had noticed that fellow lawyers who had their first child after only a couple of years at work tended to be “relegated to the dregs”. She is also aware of a “generation gap” in her profession: many older women will have waited until they are partners in their firms before having children, but some have ended up in Hewlett’s “baby hunger” trap.
Miller had realised that young mothers could be more feckless or less ambitious than older ones, which could explain why they were less successful at work. So she compared women who had their first child at, for example, 26 with those who had miscarried at 26 and then had their first child at 27.
She also compared 26-year-old mothers to women who had tried to become pregnant at 26 but had not succeeded until they were 27, to prove that the drop in lifetime earnings was caused by the age of motherhood, rather than character.
Hewlett, who is currently researching the impact of “extreme” jobs — at the top of the professions — on motherhood, said she was impressed by Miller’s work.
“It’s great stuff. It underscores the Catch-22 women are in. What makes it so compelling is it shows there is a penalty for having children that has nothing to do with one’s personal attributes,” she said.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.