Leo Lewis in Tokyo
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Japan’s turbulent history of war and natural catastrophe has already given the world a terrifying vocabulary of death: tsunami, kamikaze, Hiroshima.
But the country now stands on the brink of unleashing its most chilling phrase yet: genpatsu-shinsai – the combination of an earthquake and nuclear meltdown capable of destroying millions of lives and bringing a nation to its knees.
The phrase, derived from the Japanese words for “nuclear power” and “quake disaster”, is the creation of Katsuhiko Ishibashi, Japan’s leading seismologist and one of the Government’s top advisers on nuclear-quake safety. He said that the world may never know how close it came to its first genpatsu-shinsai this week. Luck, as much an anything else, helped to avert it.
A 6.8 magnitude quake, which shook Niigata on Monday and left thousands of homes uninhabitable, was three times more powerful than the designers of the nearest nuclear power plant – Kashiwazaki-Kariwa – had prepared for, or even imagined.
The unfolding crisis at Kashiwazaki has renewed calls for the immediate closure of the five atomic reactors at Hamaoka – an old plant in Shizuoka built directly above a geologically active fault about 100 kilometres (60 miles) west of Tokyo. Despite claims by its operators, Chubu Electric, that the plant meets government standards, seismologists said yesterday that it was “almost impossible” to ensure the safety of a nuclear plant in that location. The Hamaoka plant, said Mitsuhei Murata, a former diplomat and professor at Tokai Gakuen University, presents Japan with its biggest risk of genpatsu-shinsai.
A quake there, he said, could smash the reactor and send a radioactive cloud over Tokyo within eight hours: “We would be looking at 24 million victims and the end for Japan.”
The seismology community agrees that the Tokai region, which includes Tokyo and Hamaoka, is due for a massive quake. The Tokyo metropolitan government has drawn up disaster plans that assume an 87 per cent probability of a magnitude 8.0 quake within 30 years. But power companies have been allowed to prepare for much smaller quakes when building nuclear plants. If the epicentre of Monday’s quake had been 10 km further to the southwest, the seismology research team at Kobe University calculates that the reactor could have split and unleashed a “terrible, terrible disaster”.
As it is, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) has admitted to a worrying series of problems since the quake, including the stunning revelation that the Kashiwazaki plant was constructed on top of an active fault – despite Tepco’s firm denials in court that this was the case. Vital reactor data on the minutes immediately after the quake have already been lost by Tepco. Numerous leaks of radiation have been detected.
The Times learnt yesterday that one of the exhaust ducts continued to pump radioactive particles into the air for nearly three days after the reactors were shut down. Professor Ishibashi has fought the Government unsuccessfully for urgent reviews of quake-proofing standards throughout Japan’s nuclear industry. A member of the Government’s own panel on nuclear safety, he criticised the Government and the Japanese public yesterday for their failure to recognise how close the country was to genpat-su-shinsai. Since 1969 seismology advisers to the Government have given warning of the danger of building atomic plants, but were officially ignored. “It’s not that people carefully consider my arguments and then decide against higher standards of safety. They just don’t give the possibility of disaster a moment’s thought,” Professor Ishibashi told The Times.
“Before World War II there were many Japanese who were against the idea of a war with America but they ended up just marching blindly towards it. I think Japan today is much like it was before the atom bomb was dropped on Hiroshima.”
Citizens’ groups, a handful of corporate leaders and former government officials are fighting for a review of Japan’s nuclear reliance. Mounting evidence of radiation leaks, unprepar-edness and deception over the dangers of the plant’s location mean that the problems at Kashiwazaki will reopen a court showdown over the plant at Hamaoka.
The Government has underplayed the risk of disaster. For this, Professor Ishibashi and others blame the “nuclear village” – corporate interests, politicians with links to the industry and academics who owe their salaries to power companies. All 55 of Japan’s nuclear reactors pose a genpatsu-shinsai risk, Professor Ishibashi said.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Chris - from Sydney
The problem is - not that the earthquake simply causes leaks...
The problem lays on what if an Earthquake directly hits an Powerplant (perhaps causing the ground to fall underneath - I'll leave it to your imagination)
Japan isn't ideal for Earthquakes - especially seeing it is situated right on the boarder of a tectonic plate.
If we are to continue consider Nuclear power as a power source - we must also consider the fact that these power planets need to be placed on Geographic locations that are unlikely to change within the next 100 years.
Ken, Sunshine Coast,
I'm not sure what all the fuss here is about. Japan's reactors (to the best of my knowledge) are PWRs. These reactors have a large negative void coefficient and the water loop in the reactor is used for both moderator and coolant. Any leak in the loop during an earthquake will ensure that reaction immediately stops.
Chris, Sydney,
World can't afford any nuclear accident in any part of the globe, especially in Japan,which is the most quake prone country. This issue is not so simple to discuss and then forget after few days. We should highlight this on all scales. International community must pressurize Japan's Govt to take necessary measures to avoid any disaster in future. I hope oppostion in Japan & other serious thinkers will create awareness among the masses and will build an internal pressure to do the needful at all levels.
yousaf, Jubail, Saudi Arabia
Andrew ,
It's not the question of "how green it is ?" ...
but "how safe it is in a quake prone country like Japan ? "
I don't think it is 100% safe. And I believe this can't be tested too .
Hence we don't have a fool proof solution in place.
All this at the stake of millions of lives !!
Prem, Chennai, India
Once again the bureaucrats in Japan show a shocking blase attitude to what could have been a major disaster.You really shouldnt be able to brush this under the carpet.But it will and people here will carry on as if nothing happened.The japanese never question anything that is what they learn from schhol onwards.Keep your head down listen to authority and never question it.Very sad
Fionbarra O Crualaoich, Nagoya, Japan
I continue to be amazed at the media sensationalism and gross ignorance of many when dealing with nuclear power. A nuclear plant consists of: 1) reactor and 2) plumbing to take the heat out to a steam turbine. Multiple loops of water are used to get the heat without the radioactivity. Small leaks in miles of plumbing are normal and easily fixed. A nuclear plant conserves fossil fuels and PREVENTS pollution. A coal plant put more radioactivity into the air in a year than a nuclear plant in its life. If a reactor is built with a modern fail-safe design and a reinforced containment dome, there is no hazard to public safety. (Chernobyl was built with NO containment and was not a fail-safe design.) If the facility at Kashiwazaki was built with substandard containment, the Japanese public and TEPCO's shareholders should be outraged and emergency action should be taken to build a proper containment dome. Nuclear power is green. Don't blame it for Japanese political corruption.
Andrew Clark, Boulder Creek, California
I wonder if we shall make it to outer space, or if in some planet way out yonder, lovers will kiss to a pretty green and sudden glow in their sky, just as suddenly gone. "Oh how beautiful!" Xrettenlla will say to Krrrettzly "Now what do you think that was?"
Eugene, Heidelberg, germany
For Japan, this is business as usual.
The sad thing about all this is that it's not so much about money, meeting efficiency standards, or even getting the paychecks for the workers of the plant out in time. The blind and unquestionable authority of a bureaucracy so used to ruling by decree with no consensus (other than that of "forced informed consent") is a cancer that has slowly but surely metastasized throughout Japan that even Japanese political scientist state plainly that the only way things will change is if a disaster of epic proportions occurs. Whether it is a nuclear disaster, an earthquake on the scale of the Great Kanto Earthquake, or even Mt. Fuji blowing its top; the rest of the world is only going to learn about the worst of the gross incompetence and mismanagement after the international press goes in to survey the shattered wasteland.
Susumu, Chiba, Japan
This is a frightening article which must be taken with the utmost seriousness, not only in Japan, but in every country that has nuclear power plants or may be planning to build them. The fact that my wife comes from Kashiwazaki and has family living there, and that I once visited the nuclear power plant in question as a tourist myself, gives me a personal, not just a general, interest in making sure that truthfulness and genuine concern for public safety take precedence over boosting the profits of well connected business interests.
Roger Algase, New York, NY
A trusting population, a compliant culture, a complacent government and an industry with endless entanglement with the political powers. This is a lethal mix for any society. But on the other hand, a major nuclear disaster in Japan may be a necessary wakup call for the Japanese people to the fact that they are part of the Earth and they should start to ask questions about the actions of their government and industry leaders rather than just accepting reassurances.
Tony, Melbourne,