Leo Lewis in Kashiwazaki-Kariwa
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times

The Japanese school summer holidays have begun and on Kariwa’s vast beach two small boys are building sandcastles in the sun as their father inflates a rubber dinghy. They are quite alone on a strip of golden sand that normally draws thousands.
A hundred yards behind them, a street lies in ruins: about a quarter of the homes have been reduced to heaps of rubble. Pasted on the doors of the others are the dreaded red-and-yellow posters that mark them, perhaps forever, as uninhabitable.
And less than half a mile along the beach from where the boys are playing rise the ominously quiet exhaust chimneys of the world’s biggest nuclear power plant — its seven reactors silenced since the ground beneath was wrenched apart by the massive earthquake last month.
The awesome damage inflicted in just a few moments of extreme seismic violence has put Kashiwazaki at the centre of a painful debate — both for villagers here and Japan’s policy makers forced to confront the country’s so-called nuclear taboo.
The question is whether the badly damaged but economically vital plant should ever be allowed to switch its reactors back on.
The Times, armed with a small gamma-radiation detector, was allowed a rare tour of the reactor buildings yesterday — and the picture was grim. Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, who were also touring the reactors, were confronted by a dot-matrix screen at the site entrance that reads: “Consecutive days since last disaster — 4.”
The roads within the plant are puckered and twisted like rumpled carpets – many were patched-up hastily to allow heavy industrial vehicles to reach the worst-affected parts of the plant. Flights of stairs no longer meet their intended floors at either end, and steel lamp-posts lie strewn on the ground.
Some corridors within the reactor buildings themselves, are split by 12-inch cracks along the floor. Near one of the reactors the surrounding area has subsided by more than a yard.
The Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) that runs the site insists that the facility is now safe but in the immediate aftermath of the 6.8 magnitude tremor, it was forced to make a series of startling admissions. The plant was not designed to withstand such a strong a earthquake, radioactive material leaked into the sea and air and dozens of drums containing toxic waste broke apart.
The admission that most stunned Japan, however, was that the site, which Tepco had insisted in the High Court was nowhere near an active faultline, was in fact built directly above one. The long, straight ridge and crevice that now runs alarmingly through the middle of the Kashiwazaki plant, said one of Japan’s most respected seismologists, clearly proves that.
That faultline now threatens the future of Kashiwazaki. Katsuhiko Ishi-bashi, the Seismology Professor of Kobe University who resigned from the Government’s nuclear safety advisory panel because he doubted its independence, believes that it must be closed forever. “Even by the Government’s own guidelines, the land on which Kashiwazaki stands is completely disqualified as a suitable place to build a power plant,” he said.
Others disagree, suggesting that it is only a matter of time before the plant is back in operation. Haruki Madarame, a University of Tokyo professor of nuclear engineering and chairman of the government committee studying the impact of the July 16 earthquake, was also visiting Kashiwazaki yesterday.
“Looking at it, there was no damage on important machinery and equipment. But whether the soundness is really retained or not cannot be known until we examine the plant in more detail,” he said. “Until then, we cannot consider restarting the plant.”
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
While Mr Lewis is quick to point out that he is "armed with a small gamma-radiation detector" in this tabloidesque piece, he fails to mention what it recorded while he on this "rare" tour of the facility. Also, what is the nuclear taboo he alludes to? The issues of nuclear power and nuclear weapons are quite separate in the eyes of the government and most Japanese.
Sheero, Osaka,
Good morning,
What is your "the picture was grim" in terms of values?
That would be helpful. I honestly doubt that a high radioactive dose is to be expected from either the gases expelled or the water sent into the sea.
First the gases are noble gases that are getting diluted and have extremely little to do with our organisms, second was the water coming from pools where the first requirement is its cleanness, which also means it cannot get contaminated to a higher than its own particles content level.
Regarding the drums of low and medium radioactive wastes, they are well within the facility walls and therefor you cannot expect any realease other than on the floor there.
The only main issue is that the facility withstood a two time bigger earthquake than then one it was designed for. Can such an earthquake reapper there after the energy has already been released or is it like in Kobe, where no other earthquake is expected?
Last: why are houses always destroyed?
sebastien, Vienna, Austria
This is a well dramatized piece. The yellow and red posters on doors that may be forever uninhabitable is drama. Were the houses contaminated and how badly is the facts. The question is whether the badly damaged but economically vital plant should start up again. While I agree that this is a valid question, I so no basis for saying it was badly damaged. Granted roads and infrastructure are damaged but this is not the plant. The article states that corridors have 12 inch splits but does not say how this afects the plant (is it a seismic design corridor or an office building?). I find the that the statements of faulty location (supported by dissident seismologist) and no damage to important machinery and equipment (by Utility) the newswothy statements but the article does not say how the independent IAEA has assessed these findings or who will. Basically, I could read the funny papers and get as much out of them.
S Prussman, New Hyde Park, Nassua/NY