Ashling O’Connor in Bombay
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday

In Meerut, the memories of one of the bloodiest episodes in Indian history are still strong 150 years after the British brutally suppressed a mutiny billed as the country’s first war of independence.
So when a group of retired British army officers visited the northern Indian city to present a plaque commemorating the courage of their forefathers, they brought protests from local political parties, whose supporters burnt the ex-servicemen in effigy.
Arriving at St John’s Church, adjacent to the site of a former British parade ground, they asked Father Peter Baldev if he would fix a remembrance stone to the wall. It was dedicated to the “bravery and distinguished service” of the 1st Battalion of The 60th King’s Royal Rifle Corps between May 10 and September 20, 1857.
After consultation with the Bishop of Agra, the priest refused, and the tourists departed for Delhi, leaving a seething resentment in their wake. The battalion, far from being considered heroes, were butchers in the eyes of the locals. “The people here are agitated,” Narendra Singh Patel, a Meerut government official, told The Times yesterday. “It was an error of judgment on their part. If they had told us what they were going to do, we could have advised against it.”
The wording of the plaque was ill-advised considering that the church was also the place where 85 Indian soldiers were court-martialled on May 9, 1857 — an event that sparked a four-month uprising against colonial occupation. In the ensuing revolt, tens of thousands were slaughtered before the British regained control of Delhi on September 20.
Furthermore, the court martial in Meerut where Indian soldiers were stripped and humiliated was carried out in front of the men the retired Riflemen had come to honour.
“The US Army cannot go to Vietnam and plant something celebrating their victory. This was an attack on the emotional sensibilities of the local people,” said Amit
Patak, secretary of the regional heritage society, who guides British military tourists around Meerut. “It was superior and racist.
“Other British [people] have come with a different attitude. They laid flowers in memory of the Indians who died. This group was lost in a time when they were crushing populations all over the world.” British tourists should be warned against visiting Meerut until things settled down, he added.
Lieutenant-Colonel Nick Richardson, of the British Army, said that the group contained no serving officers and was not associated with the Ministry of Defence. Father Peter said that the leader of the group was called Roy Trustram-Lee, but he did not know which part of Britain they were from. The priest said that they claimed to have permission from the Indian Ministry of Defence to mount the plaque.

Disturbing memories
— Two plaques honouring Confederate soldiers were removed from the Texas Supreme Court in 2000 by George Bush, then Governor. Black groups said they were offensive to minorities
— Plaques left on peaks in Britain have been condemned as “litter”. A memorial garden has been placed at the foot of Ben Nevis to compensate for the planned removal of all tributes from the peak
Sources: Daily Texan, John Muir Trust
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The truth is political correctness has even effected India.
India would not be the country it is to day with the UK.
Tim, Liverpool,
Excellent point Tony, but your conclusion is somewha immature
Tim, London, UK
Sir,
"The mutiny was not a war of national independence as the concept of India as a nation state did not exist at the time. If the Indians still resent Britain so much, why do so many of them choose to live there?
Tony Fraser, Christchrch, New Zealand"
Perhaps they are planning to form an EAST ENGLAND COMPANY to make up for the East India Company? - Just a thought, what with so many British companies being taken over by the rising giants of the BRIC nations.
SC, London, United Kingdom
Interesting piece. The mutiny is still clearly a raw wound. I have always thought the shock waves of this revolt have been underestimated by British historians.
MBC, Edinburgh, UK
The mutiny of 1857 was the beginning of a revolution to make the British quit the Indian peninsula even though the concept of a united India did not exist then.
Indians don't resent Britain at all. It was the British who gave us the English language, freedom of press, the legal system and a democratic set-up. People from colonized countries do live in the former colonial countries, what's wrong with that?
SM Hussain, Hyderabad, India
The mutiny was not a war of national independence as the concept of India as a nation state did not exist at the time. If the Indians still resent Britain so much, why do so many of them choose to live there?
Tony Fraser, Christchrch, New Zealand