Dean Nelson and Ghulam Hasnain, Islamabad
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
PAKISTAN’s military ruler General Pervez Musharraf put himself on a collision course with Britain, the United States, his own country’s Supreme Court and Benazir Bhutto, the former prime minister, yesterday after he declared martial law to “save the nation”.
Bhutto, who returned from exile after striking a deal with Musharraf only last month but had been spending the weekend with her family in Dubai, immediately flew back to Karachi.
Last night, when she was finally allowed off the plane after several hours on the tarmac, she condemned the act and called on other political leaders to unite to fight it. “Instead of moving toward democracy we’re moving toward greater dictatorship,” she declared.
The dramatic events began yesterday afternoon with an announcement on state television suspending the constitution and closing down the country’s private television stations.
Troops surrounded the Supreme Court building in Islamabad, as well as the state television and radio stations. Hundreds more were deployed on Constitutional Avenue in front of the presidential palace.
Last night, at 10.15pm Pakistan time, Musharraf appeared on national television to claim that he had imposed martial law “for the good of Pakistan” and “to preserve the unity of Pakistan”. Dressed in black rather than in army uniform, he gave a rambling address in which he said the country faced a “critical and dangerous situation” and argued that “extremists are becoming confident” and “security forces demoralised”. He said: “It would have been suicidal not to act.”
He switched from Urdu to English to ask for patience from his main allies, the European Union and the United States.
“I request you all to bear with us,” he said. “Please don’t demand and expect your level of human rights and democracy you learnt over the centuries. Please give us time.”
In a reference which will anger his American allies, he compared himself to Abraham Lincoln, citing the latter’s suspension of habeas corpus and other fundamental rights during the American civil war to save his nation.
“Abraham Lincoln usurped rights to preserve the union, and Pakistan comes first. Whatever I do is for Pakistan, and whatever anyone else thinks is secondary,” he warned.
However, Bhutto insisted: “He says that he is acting for the good of Pakistan but he is acting for the good of General Musharraf.”
Musharraf's decision was announced just days before the Supreme Court was expected to overturn his recent reelection by parliament as president. One of the country’s leading barristers, Aitzaz Ahsan, who represents both Iftikhar Chaudhry, the chief justice, and Bhutto, was among those who were arrested yesterday.
Speaking by telephone from a police station in Islamabad, he said: “Musharraf is acting like a spoilt child and a bad loser. It’s clear why he did this. The Supreme Court was going to rule on Tuesday or Wednesday to strip him of the presidency. Eleven judges were going to tell him it was the end of the road.
“With all our history of military rule, Pakistan has never seen anything like this,” he added. “It’s a martial law against his own regime.”
Musharraf's act dashed any hope of democracy being restored soon and raised fears of a parlous future for the nuclear-armed state, with a weak government struggling to overcome the mounting threat of Islamic terrorism. It was greeted with alarm in Whitehall and Washing-ton, which have long supported Musharraf as a vital bastion against terrorism and had put the general under intense pressure to hold free elections.
“It’s a very black day in the political history of Pakistan,” said Nawaz Sharif, who was ousted as prime minister by Musharraf in 1999 and is now again in exile in Jeddah where he was sent after attempting to return home in September.
“I don’t know what Musharraf is thinking of – it’s unprecedented and unheard of in Pakistan’s 60 years of existence. It’s worse than martial law.”
The Supreme Court responded by instructing all senior army officers and civil servants to disobey any instructions made under the “provisional constitutional order” by which Musharraf’s regime is now ruling. Musharraf retaliated by sacking Chaudhry, the chief justice who was one of his most vociferous opponents. Chaudhry was told that his services were “no longer required”. He was replaced with Supreme Court judge Abdul Hamid Doger.
Musharraf has been considering introducing emergency rule for some months as his own position has come increasingly under threat from both the courts and militants.
Earlier in the year Condoleeza Rice, the US secretary of state, had telephoned Musharraf after midnight to stop him declaring emergency rule.
Rice responded last night by calling his decision “highly regrettable”. The US State Department said it was deeply disturbed by events and called for elections to go ahead as planned in January.
Observers said it was significant that the announcement of emergency rule was made in the name of the army chief of staff, suggesting that the military will run all aspects of the state.
However, senior figures within the military are believed to be uneasy at Musharraf’s move. “Historically, coups in Pakistan have always been against an unpopular ruler and welcomed by the population and supported by the judiciary,” said Husain Haqqani, a former adviser to Sharif and Bhutto who is now director of international relations at Boston University. “This is a coup almost no one will be able to defend.”
Government officials claimed that the decision was taken in response to a sharp rise in Tali-ban and Al-Qaeda suicide bomb attacks on military bases in Pakistan’s cities, including one on the bus carrying Bhutto through the streets of Karachi after her return home from exile. Up to 145 people died in that attack.
Others pointed out that if this was about fighting terrorism then the first step would have been to surround jihadi organisations, not the Supreme Court.
Musharraf was thought to have deliberately chosen to act while Bhutto was out of the country and had not been expected to allow her back in. But after four hours on the tarmac at Karachi, she was eventually given a police escort to her house. Wit-nesses reported that 100 troops had surrounded it.
Wajid Shamsul Hasan, Bhutto’s spokesman, said that now Musharraf had broken the deal with her Pakistan People’s party (PPP), they would have to take to the streets.
“We will resist this nonconstitutional action,” he said. “Our negotiations with General Musharraf were about a return to democracy and fair elections, not for actions like this. He’s left us no alternative but to take to the streets.”
One senior official said that Musharraf’s decision had been hastened by a sharp escalation in attacks on the country’s military bases. But General Hamid Gul, the former head of Pakistan’s military intelligence and a long-time opponent of Bhutto, said Musharraf's state of emergency would have no impact in the war with Islamic militants.
“The terrorist campaign will become more intense, but the army cannot do any more under martial law. It’s a suicidal action on Musharraf's part,” Gul said.
Military command
Pakistan’s political history has been dominated by the military:
General Ayub Khan staged a coup in 1958
Ayub Khan was ousted by General Yahya Khan in 1969
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the prime minister, was removed from power by General Muhammad Zia ul-Haq in 1977. Bhutto was hanged in 1979
Zia ruled by martial law until 1985 and died in a plane crash in 1988
Benazir Bhutto became prime minister in 1988
Nawaz Sharif elected in 1990, but quit under pressure from the military
Bhutto’s government was forced out in 1997 and Sharif returned
General Pervez Musharraf overthrew Sharif in 1999
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
1.145 people die in benazir's rally on oct 18th.
2. In swat militants take over last month.
3. Lal masjid is taken over by militants.
4. Supreme court (just as a revenge act against Mussarraf) release capture suspected militants..........all 61 of them.
5. Suice bombing of muslim against muslim is on a rise dramatically........
The list goes on and one..........
Compare that to what US is doing in IRAQ and Afghanistan to restore democracy.........
ALL MUSHARRAF DID WAS REDUCE CHANCES OF MORE BOMBINGS and MILITANTS BE ON THE STREET TO TAKE MORE MUSLIM LIVES.............
and this is bad because??????
I do not understand the mentality of mass hypocracy lingering in our minds....Only a few just a few elites that control that masses are the one's calling this measure bad. The guy (mussaraf) is just saving his country.
He is right.........the booming economy has come to an abrubt hault because of all investors running out of pakistan in fear of loosing their lives.
Taimoor, New York, USA
i think to impose state of emergency ,must have been advice by amercian foreign policy. amercia has always supported dictators. they talk of democracy but do not mean it.in muslim countries democracy doen't work. by imposing marshal law amercia and pakistani troops can crake down on fundamentlist.. history tells us that saddam ruled iraq with iron fist and there was no sucide bombings when saddam was in power.now they want to give democracy and look at iraq. i think mushaffat is doing right thing for the people of pakistan.
ifran, amdabad, india
Musharaf is taking a beating in the Press. But he is a secularist who believes in the vision of the Founder. To have a modern secularist muslim State.
Unfortunately as is usual in a third world State/Developing Nation, there are too many Chefs in the kitchen. Everyone thinks they are above the law! Even the judiciary has it's own political agenda!
Musharaf needs to deal with the insurgents and corrupt people and swiftly return to democracy.
Education of the masses is key to success. State education based on modern principles needs to be invested in and rolled out on a mass scale so that the country can move forward and prosper.
Abid, Shipley, UK
Re: Saba, Karachi
Imran Khan, the former poster boy of Pakistani Cricket, and his Tehrik-e-Insaf party won 0.8% of the popular vote, and 1 out of 272 elected members during the the last legislative elections, on 20 October 2002. He is a political lightweight, and Musharraf, Bhutto, or Sharif can make mincemeat out of him in the political arena. Incidentally, he sided with Musharraf in the 2001 referendum, thanks to Musharraf's wily overtures.
Aitzaz Ahsan is a lawyer and senior advocate in the supreme court, and has a reasonable background in Pakistani politics stretching back to the '70's. He is obviously a Bhutto and PPP sympathiser, but is still a political non-entity in Pakistan, albeit a rather vociferous and loudmouthed one.
I never advocated anything in my comments, least of all military rule. Call it brute force if you must, but General Musharraf, unlike his predecessors, has never had ANY political opponent executed, at least openly (which he could so easily have, like Zia)
Lalit Ganapathy, Chicago, USA
Biswadeep, Bangalore, India
Were you in some fantasy island? This was expected of him like any other military dictator!
Krishna R. Kumar, Udupi, India
Imran Khan is not a political non-entity, nor is Aitizaz Ahsan. They are both very popular and perhaps the most sensible among all the prominent politicians in the country. "The judiciary appears to have had a rather exaggerated sense of its own powers... only because Musharraf and the military allowed them those victories." ??? What you're saying is just advocating military rule, the Supreme Court needs its powers so the country can be run properly, otherwise it would turn into a dictatorship, which is exactly what is happening.
Musharraf has not been 'wily' at all.. this is called 'using brute force'.
saba, karachi, pakistan
I read all the four comments they lack vision and past international history.theyeven sound shallow on the current affairs and future anticipation of the regional circumstances. the ground realities are seems to be weak by western thinking in general lack of information on area people specially their missry. fighting ussr first then american back lash. fault is of the west mush and the people are innocent.true to their cause against the intrest of west.. He should have done it much before he is late. all the better. would usa give the oil wealth easily to ussr? Next is iran then India under he cover of osama. american and west getting dove ask ISRAILIES?
k.j. kirmani, karachi, sind/Pakistan
His opponents are underestimating this commando general. He will crush them mercilessly!
Also this is good for the US and allies! With full cooperation from him, the US and allies can now eliminate the Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters/terrorists in the Pakistan's border with Afghanistan.
There is no option but to mercilessly bomb these areas to win in Afghanistan!
Regards,
Krishna R. Kumar, Udupi, India
It is indeed amusing to hear the views of political non-entities like Imran Khan and Aitzaz Ahsan complain that Musharraf is acting like a "spoiled child" and that his days are numbered.
Detractors and political opponents of the general have been predicting his downfall for sometime now, yet the wily Musharraf has always managed to outfox all of them, for all of eight years, and with the proverbial velvet glove
It is contemptible for Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif to cry wolf, and say that Musharraf is merely trying to save his skin by declaring martial law. All of Pakistan knows that both Bhutto and Sharif are crooks who have unscrupulously amassed fortunes at Pakistan's expense while they were in power - as much as the army.
Musharraf gave the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice a long rope. The judiciary appears to have had a rather exaggerated sense of its own powers after some minor victories, and then too, only because Musharraf and the military allowed them those victories.
Lalit Ganapathy, Chicago, USA
There was no other option. Militants have started their war already and army personnel are under fire in the western front. Bhutto and nawaz sharif both have failed in their previous terms as primeminister. Controlled democracy with army on the streets is the only way out in Pakistan. Elections will bring militant parties in the driving seat causing more problems for their country and west.
Aver
Averi, sheffield, UK
The General's gone crazy. he would now very well do, just anything to stay in power.
Biswadeep, Bangalore, India
Mush is de facto puppet of western governments,may be his western advisers would have pushed him into this trap,and this is his end.Remember how Zia-ul-haq another dicator of same nation vanished misterously after Soviet withdrawal.Pakistan is heading for fate of Iraq and Afghnistan.I think regional powers like India , China and Russia shud step in to keep the situation stable.US and UK does not have capacity to contain a situation like this,they are only capable of carpet bombing.So,comments from condy or brown are irrelevent.
Gandaav, Srinagar, India/J&K
Musharraf is their best choice for now...probably he did this for power but we should not foget that alqaida and terrorism is growing there daily and we just dont need pakistan under taliban right now
shpresa, Vancouver, Ca