Michael Smith
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Read Mick Smith's defence blog
MILITARY commanders need an extra 3,000 troops in Afghanistan to contain the Taliban, according to senior defence sources. They have also called for more talks with leaders in northern Helmand province in an attempt to separate them from the Taliban.
The calls came as Afghan officials claimed that an adviser to the United Nations and a European Union official expelled last week had $150,000 (£75,000) with them. According to Kabul, the men were trying to buy off a local Taliban leader in Musa Qala.
MI6, Britain’s secret intelligence service, was heavily involved in bribing Taliban leaders in southern Afghanistan to change sides during the 2001 operation to remove the group from power.
British officials have been careful to distance current MI6 talks with Taliban commanders in Helmand from the expulsions of Michael Semple, the Irish head of the EU mission, and Mervyn Patterson, a British adviser to the UN.
The town of Musa Qala - scene of a previous truce brokered by British special forces - was retaken by British and Afghan troops this month after a Taliban commander changed sides. When Semple and Patterson were detained, they had the cash and data on their laptops showing they had made previous payments to a local Taliban leader, according to Afghan officials.
Senior British commanders believe last year’s Musa Qala truce, brokered by the Special Boat Service, should have been the blueprint for others across Helmand. But after Dan McNeil, an American general, took over as commander of Nato forces in February and denounced the deal, it was broken by US air attacks.
The commanders say they have no problem taking ground from the Taliban but do not have enough men to hold it.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The Afghans are like Chechens, if you kill one of them then fifty of their relatives will be after you. Steer well clear and don't mess with these dudes. America like Russia will bankrupt itself there. They can make bullets out of tin cans!
Keith Bentham, wigan, Lancashire
Sir,
Surely we should base our strategy upon realistic targets instead of playing to political egos or idealogical fanatics?
The vast "Empire" of the erstwhile USSR had an unimpeded contiguous land border, with well-trained and armed cannon-fodder troops who knew the region well and were acclimitised. Remember during the Cold War, we expected to be overrun without US aid and nuclear weapons by these very same troops. Furthermore our over-extended supply lines are stretched across difficult regions e.g. Pakistan.
Considering the hard-headed reality of history, do we have a better chance here than in Iraq? Can we afford to spill our blood and treasure, and to what end?
SC, London, United Kingdom
British Generals were convinced that Iraq was the wrong war
and Afghanistan the right war. American Generals saw it
differently, Iraq must be pacified first which they are doing and
then their will be more resources to transfer to Afghanistan
Which has never been pacified by anyone.
Surely all this shows us that in a tight spot we can only rely on
the Americans to fight with us, not the Europeans. SO WHY
ARE WE IN THE E.U.?
American tactics in Iraq could work in Afghanistan, which is
you raise and fight with local forces against the terrorists.
Roderick, Hampshire, England
There will be no more troops from the UK not while that gutless Brown is in charge he wants as much as he can get his grubby little hands on to throw at his grandiose schemes adding to the mountain of public funds already wasted by this failure of a PM.
As for the EU countries involved in Afghanistan these gutless cowards wont even leave their bases let alone do any fighting. So dream on about any increases in troop numbers.
D Case, Newquay,
WHY? Does no one look back to history and see Afghanistan, littered with endless, futile conflicts. Many people will die for nothing.
Neil, Burnley, Lancashire
I can think of no more meaningless death for a soldier than fighting in Afghanistan against the Pashtun. Afghanistan is where empire go to die. No outside power in all history has succeeded long term in domination of this area.
Taliban is an empty word, only a political slogan. Using it only means that you do not or will not acknowledge that we fight the Pashtun. I do not claim to be any expert, but correct me anyone if I am wrong in saying that they are a fierce warrior culture, dominant in the area, loyal to a conservative version of Islam, cannot be bought off successfully, and the more we kill, the more they will hate us, fight us, and want revenge which is also a strong element of their culture. Additionally, most Pashtun reside in Pakistan, a result of the Durand Line's whimiscal delineation of military and political power. The Pashtun do not acknowledge it.
Karzai cannot alter any of this, and his government is a fiction extening perhaps to the limits of Kabul.
tarquinis, Seattle, USA