Richard Beeston, Foreign Editor
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
Winter in Afghanistan is traditionally the season when hostilities cease, enforced hibernation sets in and the warring parties make preparations for the spring offensive.
But 2008 could be an exception. The first suicide bombing of the new year, an unprecedented attack against the Kabul Serena Hotel, has shaken the capital. The city is now braced for more bombings against Western civilian targets by the Taleban.
US forces have been in action this weekend against Taleban fighters in the east.
In the south five Afghan civilians were killed yesterday by a roadside bomb intended for a Nato patrol.
The bloody start to the year is probably a foretaste of what is likely to follow once the snows melt, the mountain passes reopen and the fierce struggle resumes for the fate of the country.
According to the Afghanistan NGO Safety Office, which advises aid groups on security in the country, Nato and the Taleban are about to enter a “broad and deep” conflict.
“In simple terms, the consensus amongst informed individuals at the end of 2007 seems to be that Afghanistan is at the beginning of a war, not the end of one,” the group said in a report looking ahead at 2008.
For the Taleban the strategy is clear. Spread the insurgency, undermine the reconstruction efforts, drive a wedge between foreign forces and the local population and isolate the beleaguered Government of President Karzai.
The movement is assisted by the chaos in neighbouring Pakistan. Men, arms and funds can more easily slip across the border, and its al-Qaeda allies, at large in the lawless tribal territories, are freer than at any time since 2001 to plan and execute operations across the border in Afghanistan.
The USled Nato forces, who have 40,000 troops in Afghanistan, are keenly aware of the growing threat and the need for more combat soldiers to meet the challenge, particularly in the lawless southern provinces.
But far from agreeing on a strategy, the alliance is dangerously divided. The main contributing nations remain at odds over who should do the fighting, for how long and the tactics employed.
The private differences broke out into a public row last week when Robert Gates, the US Defence Secretary, openly criticised the fighting skills of his main allies.
“I am worried we are deploying [military advisers] that are not properly trained and I am worried we have some military forces that do not know how to do counter-insurgency operations,” he told the Los Angeles Times.
“Most of the European forces, Nato forces, are not trained in counter-insurgency; they were trained for the Fulda Gap [Nato’s Cold War battle lines in Germany].”
The remarks triggered an angry response from Britain, the Netherlands, Canada, Australia and Denmark, whose troops have done the bulk of the fighting in southern Afghanistan. Mr Gates attempted to soothe offended allies, but did not withdraw his remarks.
At the heart of the frustration felt by the Pentagon is the failure of the European allies to commit more combat troops to the fight. Germany and Italy have refused to redeploy their forces from the relative safety of western and northern Afghanistan to the battlefields of the south.
Canada, whose forces have taken heavy casualties in the Taleban stronghold of Kandahar, has given warning that it may not extend its mandate beyond the end of this year because of growing public opposition to the war.
Nato commanders need 7,500 troops in Afghanistan and so far only America has stepped in to fill the gap with 3,200 Marines to fight alongside the 5,500 British forces in Helmand province.
Before Nato can hope to defeat the Taleban, it must resolve its internal conflict. The decisive battleground will likely be the Nato summit in Bucharest in April, when alliance leaders will have to recommit to the fight or face the prospect of defeat.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Lars is probably right.
Perhaps if the Iraq War had never happened, the US would have the resources to wage a succesful war on the Pashtun tribes.
Perhaps also if NATO were to commit the full weight of it's military force it would possible.
Neither of these things will happen soon, so it's going to be years of long, bloody struggle for little gain.
Jonathon Wallace, Sydney, Australia
As for "driving a wedge between the foreign forces and the local population" the ISAF is pretty good at it without the help of the "Taleban": increasingly relying on air bombings, trying to eradicate poppy cultivation, and introducing Western liberal values into this deeply conservativa society are sure recipes for alienating the native population and ensuring defeat. What the ISAF is doing is waging war, not on the "Taleban", but on the Pashtuns, the world's biggest tribal nation (appr. 40 million people, most of them across the border in Pakistan). Alexander did not defeat them, the British were twice defeated by them, the Russians were defeated in the 1980ies, after deploying more than 100 000 Soviet Army troops and 320 000 Afghan "National Army" troops. Do NATO commanders really believe "victory" is possible? Hardly. They are politically correct , and pay lip service to the hogwash of their political leaders. Afghanistan is lost. Declare victory and pull out!
Lars Adelskogh, Skövde, Sweden