Bronwen Maddox: World Briefing
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
To call President Musharraf a lame duck is an evasion; he is surely finished. As the results from the Pakistani elections on Monday come in, it is clear that he has almost no support in Parliament — and the few in his party who kept their seats are rushing to distance themselves from him. So is the Army, which he commanded until November and which underpinned his eight-year military rule.
As the new coalition Government takes shape it is clear that its first aim will be to overturn his controversial re-election in September.
The shock in these elections for the national and provincial assemblies is that the party of Musharraf, one branch of the conservative Pakistan Muslim League (PML Q), was wiped out. Of his ministers 23 lost their seats. The only one who survived had broken his link with the party before the vote. This was a revolt against the rule of Musharraf even if it was also a sympathy vote for the assassinated Benazir Bhutto, whose liberal, secular Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) emerged with the largest number of seats, although short of an overall majority.
The second surprise is the strength of support for Nawaz Sharif, the head of the other branch of the Pakistan Muslim League (PML N). He is now the power broker: his party controls Punjab, which is bigger than the other three provinces put together. The PPP will have to turn to him for support and he has a good chance of picking up former supporters of Musharraf from the PML (Q) or even merging the two branches again.
There were bright spots in these crucial elections. The gracefulness of the PML (Q) in its concession was one. The savage rebuff that voters delivered to the Islamist parties was another. Their grip on the North West Frontier Province was broken by the Army National Party, a Pashtun nationalist movement.
The polls appear to have broadly met the level of credibility needed for international recognition and for avoiding violent protest at home, although they were marred by reports of polling stations losing or selling voting cards. They were also calmer than the election campaign, which claimed the lives of several politicians including Bhutto, although fears of violence and systematic intimidation in the west explain the low turnout of just over 30 per cent.
It is hard to see the dust settling to reveal the path to a calm transition from the Musharraf years. It will not be straightforward to put together a coalition. The PPP lacks an obvious leader, although Makdoom Amin Fahim, who ran the party during the exile of Bhutto, is a sensible if uncharismatic candidate with a power base in Sindh.
The biggest uncertainty surrounds the intentions of Sharif: whether, given the levers suddenly at his disposal, he would be prepared to work under a PPP prime minister and whether he retains the Islamist tendencies that he displayed when last in power.
British officials, who after the assassination of Bhutto had mused about whether Sharif could be useful in splitting the religious vote, may find that they have had the misfortune to get what they wished.
Sharif said yesterday that he would work within any coalition government to defeat dictatorship. This is barely concealed code for getting rid of Musharraf.
Although the President has said that he would work with any incoming government, since Musharraf deposed Sharif in the 1999 coup the men have loathed each other, even by the standards of a country where politics is too personal.
If that is the aim of Sharif it will not be hard. The PPP and the PML (N) abstained in the September vote in Parliament, which purportedly re-elected Musharraf as President for a further five years. They have vowed to reinstate the Supreme Court judges whom Musharraf sacked in the autumn when they would not pronounce his re-election as constitutional. The parties will also strip the presidency of powers that Musharraf took for himself — including the right to dissolve Parliament.
Musharraf will face all these legal challenges. At the same time the army, under General Ashfaq Kiyani, whom Musharraf appointed, has distanced itself from politics and will give him no support. The resignation of Fidel Castro yesterday did Musharraf a favour, not just by stealing attention away from his humiliation but by showing him what to do next.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
As a seasoned citizen of the USA, this is all "deja vu all over again" to me. The same situation presented itself in Vietnam when Diem was President. He was not perfect, but he was in conrol of South Vietnam more than any other person. The United States and others felt he was too oppressive, and--at least--turned their backs on his assassination. The Viet Cong were later heard to say that the murder of President Diem "...was a gift from heaven."
Who do the enemies of Pakistan's President propose to replace him with? He has the army behind him, and he has been an ally in the fight against al-Qaida. He has survived two assassination attempts. If he is forced from office, there will just be more chaos which will deteriorate into God knows what.
Philip Monroe, Pacific Grove, USA/California
Why not for a change give Musharraf credit for actually coming through and allowing fair elections and roots of democracy to take hold. People also forget that Both Nawaz Sharid and Benazir practiced nepotism and looted the treasury, last time they were in power. Getting rid of Musharraf at this point would be counter productive, since it would cause more upheavel. His pro-Western stance can only aid the fight against terrorism.
Hamad Lone, London, England
When I saw the headline of this article I turned to it, expecting it to discuss President Bush. But apparently only Muslim military dictators are bad.
Tom Welsh, Basingstoke,
Elections have shown rejection of Perevz Musharraf and his cohorts.It has been a vote for secular democracy and against dictatorship,authoritarianism and miltancy.The political landscape is largely sterile.That is only to be expected.
Pakistan has been ruled by military dictatorship for more than half its life and under the shadow of military bayonets for the rest.The political system will take time before it matures.
As Asif Zardari looks like a man walking in shoes that do not fit and Nawaz Sharif retains his Islamist tendencies,a resurgent and determined civil society provides hope for keeping the future rulers on track.Even as Musharraf was receiving declarations of support from his foreign backers,lawyers,judges,journalists,human rights activists etc.were protesting against violation of the constitution and the law and building up pressure for free and fair election and restoration of independent judiciary.Let us hope and pray for the victory of the civil society and Pakistan.
Afzal A. Neseem, Lincoln, Nebraska
It's the Awami National Party, not "Pakistan Army National Party" unless it's leadership has had a change of heart at this rather awkward moment.
Messrs. Nawaz Sharif and Asif Zardari have shown a lot of political maturity in recent times and thus it appears that they will move with a great deal of caution, tact and sagacity as they try and bring the disparate gruoups together on one platform to restore the 1973 consitution and undo the ill affects of the heinous crimes that Musharraf has committed against the judiciary, media, and civil society in general.
One of the most slautary impact that the elections are likely to have will be in the Frontier province as the liberal Awami National Party has regained it's strength after Musharraf had handed over the province in 2002 to the Mullahs. Bush might finally wake up to the reality that Musharraf was part of the problem in the so called fight against terror.
Rao Ali, Unionville, Ontario, Canada
Pakistan would loose a smart and wise ruler if Genral Pervez Musharraf leaves, he surely did alot for Pakistan. May God bless him always.
NINEZERO KARACHI, KARACHI , PAKISTAN
It looks like Pakistan belongs to the bhuttos and the shareefs only. The so called son of the soils , uhhh
NINEZERO KARACHI, KARACHI , PAKISTAN
Um, Bronwen, what about Bush? He's far more of a lame duck than Musharraf and has achieved far less than his counterpart in Pakistan during their respective periods in power. Musharraf has played an almost reactionary part, keeping under control domestic religious tensions, rivalry with India and Bush/Blair's warmongering across the border, generally steadying the ship. Yes, his time is now up, but what's next for Pakistan? Sharif was hardly a strong character (which is what is required) during his time in power, who is to say that the vacuum left by Musharraf's departure will not be filled by an extremist-led faction, or even another coup?
Philip Edwards, Tunbridge Wells,
Pakistani Nation has taken revenge through democracy from the worst western supported dictator in Pakistan Gen Musharaff. We remember some time ago he said there is no place for Bhutto and Sharif in Pakistan, now he is saying he can work with everyone. What a shame!
Syed Abbas Gilani, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotton son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. Jesus is the answer today! Please pray for pakistan and the christians there. we are prayng for you
Elaine, N.P., Bahamas
Bush should plan a lecture tour of Afghanistan? Only if he wanted to visit of Bin laden's grave..
John, Tucson, Arizona
"To call President Pervez Musharraf a lame duck is an evasion. He is surely finished. "
Um, that's what "lame duck" means. It means you are finished.
jon livesey, Sunnyvale, CA/USA
Mush could now join forces with Bush, and plan a lecture tour of Afghanistan.
Shaffiq Mahmood, Halifax, UK