Leo Lewis In Tokyo
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
An escalating war of words across the world’s last Cold War, nuclear-armed border spiraled dramatically yesterday when North Korea threatened to wreak total destruction on its neighbour to the south.
“Our military will not sit idle until warmongers launch a pre-emptive strike,” the official news agency in Pyongyang reported a senior military commander as saing, “everything will be in ashes, not just a sea of fire, if our advanced pre-emptive strike once begins.”
The threat was among the most direct and bellicose statements from Pyongyang since North Korea test-fired an atomic device in late 2006. International efforts since then to persuade the country’s enigmatic dictator, Kim Jong il, to abandon his weapons programme have repeatedly stalled.
The threat also marked a fourth day of rapidly deteriorating relations on the Korean peninsula, which remains technically still at war despite more than 50 years of often uncomfortable armistice.
The two countries – the prosperous, modern South and the unpredictable Stalinist Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) – continue to glare at one another across the world’s most heavily armed border.
A note sent by a North Korean military delegation to its South Korean counterpart on Saturday, said that “these outbursts are the gravest challenge ever in the history of the inter-Korean relations and a reckless provocation little short of a war declaration against the DPRK.”
Sunday’s warning followed remarks in Seoul earlier in the weekend in which the head of South Korea’s military vowed to conduct a pre-emptive strike on the suspected North Korean nuclear weapons site if Pyongyang tried to attack with atomic weapons.
The office of the chairman of the South’s joint chiefs of staff later explained that it was a statement of general principles, rather than a hint that the South was planning any unprovoked attack on the North. Pyongyang said that it would suspend all cross-border dialogue unless the remarks were withdrawn and an apology issued.
Although the communist regime of Kim Jong Il has regularly used this form of extreme language in the past, long-term North Korea experts said that its renewed appearance of the past few days should be treated with some caution.
The row, which has already seen 11 South Korean officials expelled from a joint economic “friendship” zone by the North, is thought to be a test by Pyongyang of the mettle of the new president in Seoul.
On Friday the DPRK test-fired a salvo of short-range missiles, reprising an act that has traditionally provoked outrage in Seoul and placed South Korean leaderships under immense domestic strain.
Lee Myung Bak was elected to the South Korean presidency in December last year on promises of a stronger economy. But he made little secret that his view towards North Korea and Kim Jong il would be far less conciliatory than his predecessor’s.
His response to the current escalation of tensions will be closely scrutinised on both sides of the demilitarized zone that splits the peninsula.
In addition to the deeper conflict over Pyongyang’s atomic weapons programme, the most recent row has ignited an argument over a line in the Yellow Sea that has never been recognised by North Korea: officials in Pyongyang said on Friday that “armed conflict may break out at any moment” over the boundary.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I was shown in a dream, that a nuke would burn the Pacific Ocean and two sides of the countries on either side of it. I think this is the culprit. It makes sense. Also, I live on the West Coast and had another dream of heading East just barely in time, escaping something ominous BHIND me. Also, Ed Dames-famous military remote viewer/teacher of such, saw North Korea being the first nuclear detination many years ago.
Valerie, Paradise, U.S.A.
For those of you that have added your comments, go back to your history books. The Jeff Rense site has a article about the Norths tactics in an all out war. Read this article. The American forces would be overrun in two hours and they know this. South Korea is indefensable. Nukes against the North would be useless. They are the most tunneled people on this planet. Every tank, aircraft, artillery peice and missle is buried beneath solid granite up to three hundred feet down. If the North comes across the border the South will be theirs the same day. Americans, you think youre invinsable. Think again.
James MacDonald, Nuevo Arenal, Costa Rica
The Hopi prophecies talk about a Gourd of Ashes being built by man that is man made fire. The Hopi consider nuclear weapons to be that invention. Their prophecies also speak about the land now known as America pretty much being burnt to a crisp by the same weapons they invented eventually.
There is already peace in this world. I am at peace. Peace begins from within.
ShadowDancer, Seattle, USA/Wa
If North Korea launches such a strike, they will be incinerated shortly after and they must know this. The scary thing is, the old adage that "only a madman would start a nuclear war" certainly applies to Kim. One wonders if Iran is attacked, will Kim, realizing he is the only one left on the "axis of evil", may launch a strike figuring he has nothing to lose. And one wonders how far it will spread. If India sees an attack going on they might be tempted to launch on China, or vice versa. Its a very dangerous situation the world finds itself in.
Carlo, Miami,
In a way, NK has become a convenient international leverage for China. Although it is certainly not a cause-and-effect relationship, one cannot completely ignore the coicidence of the missile tests and the recent Tibet uproar. Chances are, NK had China's blessings this time, unlike the time when they tested the nuke. China, and to a lesser extent, Russia, will likely try to hold on to the status quo in NK for a while to come. As long as the west has bones to pick with totalitarian regimes like China and Russia, they will continue backing NK for leverage, and SK will have to work a lot harder for peace. While the south has much more advanced military technology, it is worrying that half of SK's population is concentrated near Seaul, a focused attack by NK might be incredibly effective.
John Smith, NYC, New York
I think this is something we really should be watching with a close eye. In my eyes this could start another World War if China was to join the North is it did in the days of the Korean War. I say this because China could use this as a way to declare war on the USA in attempts to take back provinces such as Taiwan, countries that the USA helped win there independency and backs there freedom to this day. Its sad but true, if this where to happen then the USA would not have much to work with seeing we already have our hands tied with the War in the Middle East and we are experiencing a slowing economy that comes with any war.
Will there ever be peace in this world?
Trey Takahashi, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America
Realise this indicates I have too much free time on my hands, but I calculated that if Kim fires his missiles at the US Naval base in Yokosuka, I should get a first class view here in the Japan Alps as they pass over. Assuming there is no cloud cover. Tricky calculation, you have to take into account zenithal projection. But were as psychotic and paranoid as Kim (not such a leap) and wanted to go for broke, a simultaneous attack on Japan and the US just might be the move Iâd make.
Andrew Milner, Karuizawa, Japan Alps
You really think that Bush has influence over north Korea? I don't really view a war in Korea as such a bad thing, because it would lead to the liberation of the north korean people. Nobody seems to care much about them.
Ash, Longmont, Colorado
The UN tends to rest on its laurels until the fighting is already well under way. Rwanda and Darfur are examples that come to mind. I don't think US involvement is always good, but if you'll recall, the UN Coalition that came to South Korea's aid in 1950 was overwhelmingly made up of American troops. Either way, the situation is remarkably tense - 50 years of stalemate? Its just a matter of time.
Chris B, Syracuse, New York
The problem is that if Bush is involved the pre-emptive strike option could well become the preferred option leading to a very short, but incredibly calamitous nuclear exchange that could also start to involve other players.
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it". Look at how the dominoes rolled in WW1...
Ian Graham, North Tamborine, Australia
Bush calm things? oh you mean like he did in Iraq and Afghanistan, because I'm not hearing about much calm there at the moment. Leave peace keeping to the UN its not Americas place to control and bully other nations.
Chris Bradley, Nottingham,
When the telephone rings at 3 am as in the Clinton advert, there is a very good chance the subject will be something that has happened in Korea. There is also a good chance that what happens will not be the result of a conscious decision of either North or South Korea, but a hair-trigger response of both to something that may not even happen, but will be seen by one or the other to have happened, resulting in an accidental war and millions of deaths. Such a conflict can't be reacted to, it can only be prevented in advance.
Christopher Hobe Morrison, Pine Bush, Ulster County, NY, USA
The notion that President Bush could calm anything defies reason.
rolf westgard, st paul, MN USA
This could be trouble; Bush needs to step in and calm the waters before the situation becomes more dangerous. One war is Korea was bad enough; we don't need another.
norm, acarlsbad, usa/calif.