Sonia Verma in Panjawai
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Private Terry John Street was on a routine patrol along a lonely stretch of road flanked by green marijuana fields and deserted towns when his armoured vehicle struck a roadside bomb, killing him instantly.
On the same road, less than three hours earlier, two Canadian soldiers and their Afghan interpreter were wounded in another explosion. As their comrades struggled to clear the remains of the vehicle they hit another bomb.
The attacks ended an especially bloody week for Canadian forces who, more than any other nation, have been at the violent forefront of the mission in Afghanistan. Since taking command of the alliance in the unhospitable province of Kandahar in 2006, Canadian soldiers have taken the lead in training Afghan police to assume eventual control over their own security. Without enough troops, and with insufficient airpower and poor intelligence, they have been frustrated by an increasing number of attacks that undermine their exit strategy.
In the week of Private Street’s death, patrols discovered more than 12 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) buried in the road. “It’s anarchy out there. We’re begging for somebody to fire at us so we can shoot back, but this battle has changed,” said Sergeant-Major Gorden Cavanaugh, from the 2nd Battalion of Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry, the principal unit patrolling the volatile region southwest of Kandahar city.
Commanders here hope that 1,000 additional troops, pledged by Nato the day before Private Street died, will give their 2,500 troops the boost they need in this region, which has long been a sanctuary for Taleban insurgents. “The more troops we get, the better it gets for us on the ground,” Colonel Christian Juneau, the deputy commander of Canadian troops in southern Afghanistan, said.
In the dusty frontline outposts occupied by Canadian forces there are concerns that the reinforcements are not enough to achieve the coalition’s strategy, which at its simplest is to supply security while giving Afghan security forces enough training so they can take over when Nato withdraws. “Sometimes it feels like every time we make progress, we fall two steps back. The problem is we’re overstretched and a thousand more troops isn’t going to solve that,” one soldier, who has served in the Canadian military for nearly 20 years, said.
The battle group of Private Street patrolled three police substations, where Canadian soldiers mentor Afghan police. The crude, barbed-wire fortresses, made of oil drums and sandbags, were viewed as a victory for Nato forces when they were built deep in the Taleban territory last year. Canadian troops were welcomed by villagers who had long been victimised by Taleban insurgents.
When the current rotation of Canadian soldiers arrived in February “this was pretty much the place to come to get shot at”, Captain Bob Barker, 26, said as he stood on an observation post pockmarked with bullet holes.
The police who were meant to patrol the area were rife with corruption. They lacked proper equipment and basic training, and routinely took bribes to compensate for their lack of pay. The Canadians parachuted in a contingent of civil-order police from Kabul, sent the police on a training course and set out on joint patrols.
The ferocious fighting with the Taleban tapered off. But without enough troops to train police, gather intelligence on foot patrols and guard the road to prevent insurgents from planting explosives, soldiers were sometimes faced with a stark choice.
Private Street died on a road that had been recently cleared of IEDs, which Major Mike Lane describes as “the perfect weapon against us because we can’t be there 100 per cent of the time”. When his convoy was hit, a road that had been secured was revealed to be surprisingly vulnerable, so the mission was “refocused”.
Canadians have been criticised by some American officials for allegedly prioritising peacekeeping over counter-insurgency operations meant to hunt down the Taleban.
Canadians counter that without more troops, they are most effective by securing areas where they have the greatest chance of success — in populated areas where locals can be won over and eventually stand up to the Taleban themselves.
As casualties mount, support for Canada’s military involvement in Afghanistan back home is eroding, with polls suggesting that 40 per cent of Canadians want to withdraw from the conflict.
When asked how long Afghanistan needed Canadian support before his troops could handle security alone, Corporal Izatullah Hotak, a 22-year-old Afghan commander, said: “We need the Canadians until 2050. The Taleban is supported by foreign countries. We need to be as well.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
We are proud to be there alongside the Canadian's
Peter, London,
The best way to help the undermanned Canadians is to form
a commonwealth Brigade for Kandahar Province like we did
in Korea 1950.....there was a British Brigade and a
Commonwealth Brigade with British troops attached in Korea.
The commonwealth Brigade for Kandahar would be commanded by the Canadians and consist of one Canadian
infantry battalion, one British infantry battalion and one
Australian/New Zealand Battlegroup. Where would Britain
find the infantry battalion from?....take it from Kosovo and let
the Europeans handle Kosovo.
Frank, Exeter, England
"@ Azure
Canada has been invited to be in Afghanistan to help them establish peace and security. They are not there for their own gain, but Afghanistan's gain - look at the last comment by the Afghani policeman.
Canada's reputation is just fine - you don't enlist even more support from NATO if you have no standing in the international community.
@ Alex Penn
What makes you think that Canada is fighting blindly? Quite a comment...have you been there, watching what the troops are doing? They are not fighting Afghani militia - they are fighting mainly foreign troops who are supporting the Taleban. They are supporting the Afghani army, side by side.
The Canadian troops enlisted to serve their country. Canada has had a long tradition of going out to aid those who cannot help themselves. If the mission does not succeed, it will not be because of a military failure - it will be because of a lack of international support for the Afghani people. History will certainly be the judge
dave, grangemouth,
Thanks for this story.
I am a Canadian looking for a better explanation of why we are fighting in Afghanistan.
My neighbours say it is so girls can go to school. My government says it is so we can help with the three D's -- development, diplomacy and defence -- which my news sources tell me have been cut down to only one D -- defence.
I question whether our role in Afghanistan fits the Canadian peacekeeping image.
If so, I for one would like to see our government make it plain. What is our goal in Afghanistan?
In conversation with a fellow I met, I was critical of Canada's role. I was halted when he talked about serving as a reservist in Bosnia. He made it clear that I should not be critical of the people who serve.
As he said, "When I was over there I had no time for any of this. I was too busy trying to keep my people from being blown up." And he meant it.
So it falls to us to ask for information and make our own judgement, and recomend to our governments what we expect.
jonku, sunset beach,
As a former Canadian Forces soldier ( 1966 to 1996 ) I will poing out that we ( Canada ) have been fighting way beyond our actual troop size in the sandbox, and if some of the other NATO countries, like Germany, Italy, Spain and France were to actually go out and SEEK the enemy, we might be more sucessfull as a whole. They have placed so many restrictions on their ROE that they might as well have sent troupes of clowns over there, for all they actually do. No night patrols, no staying and holding towns, and no appetite to actually fight and yes DIE, to get things turned around,
The CF in Afghanistan has a current manpower number of 2500 all ranks, of which only 900 are actual combat arms soldiers, the rest are medical, admin and reconstruction /education types, who are trying to rebuild the province of Khandahar's infrastructure, while the Taliban keep blowing it up.
Jim B. Toronto.
jim bunting, toronto , canada
This is just another instance where history will be the judge. Canadians blindly fighting a seemingly endless flow of Afghan militia.
Is that what they enlisted for when they joined the Canadian army?
Alex Penn, Kingston-upon-Thames,
Perhaps you(Azure ,Canada) meant to say that the Troops are brave ,but the Leaders are Stupid. I hope so. As for it not being Canadas fight, well, we all know where "splendid Isolation" gets you. The "if we leave Them alone , MAYBE they'll leave us alone" School of thought gets you the Rise of Nazism and the slow swallowing up of Europe ,the Rise of Fascism in a timid country that's emboldened by the Worlds inaction to invade Africa, the Rise of Communism which still has an iron grip on a third of the Planet. and now , the Rise of Fundamentalism in all it's Ghastly forms. THAT,i'm afraid is where hiding at home gets you. However, I do think we should pick our fights better. Iraq was So Wrong ,whereas Afghanistan should have been First and Foremost in our efforts.
Nigel, Whitby, u.k.
We are very proud of our troops and the work they are carrying out in Afghanistan, We also know there are many defeatists in our midst who wish us harm, These people forget why they or their parents came to Canada and all that Canada has done for them, Well that is what Canada is trying to do in Kandahar and other places to bring some sense of normality back to the lives of the decent people of that region especially the women and children too long abused by fanatics who's philosophy is the road to ruinous and everlasting war. Canada is not on an offensive operation here quite the contrary this is still a traditional Canadian peace brokering mission albeit a very difficult one.
peter k, Vancouver BC., Canada
Don't confuse stupidity with courage.
Afghanistan was never a Canadian fight, should never have been a Canadian fight, and we should leave immediately.
You cannot convert a population to support you by killing them. Canada has eroded its international standing as peacekeepers by becoming an aggressor nation. There is absolutely no gain for Canada for this mis-adventure. Canada will be very lucky if we don't lose our entire contingent.
Azure, Vancouver, Canada
We, in Britain , get hardly any news on the involvement of our brave Canadian cousins in Afghanistan. you have to trawl the Net to get anything really, which is unfortunate ,as their forces like our own , are currently in an impossible position of trying to implement a seriously flawed plan, regardless of much Bravery and toil. You can't ask a poverty stricken farmer to stop growing the most profitably and only cash crop he can farm, with the excuse that" the West doesn't like it" ,while giving no real alternative means to survive . No matter how nicely or firmly you tell him "the Taliban and Al Qaeda are your enemy, we are your friends" If we burn his crops and he can't feed his family, he's going to think "with friends like that who needs enemies" And if the Taliban offer him enough money to feed his family for months, just to plant one little bomb on the road beside his burnt field , which might encourage those Westerners not to return, his only choice left becomes too obvious
Nigel, Whitby, u.k.
Only an ignorant fool would criticize the bravery and courage of the Canadian armed forces. We are lucky to have such an amazing country as our neighbor. As Shakespeare put it; "We few, we happy few, we band of brothers. For whoever sheds his blood with me today, shall be my brother..." Heres to you, proud Canada. Long may you live.
ingo baker, los angeles, california, usa
Canadian forces efforts to win over the support of the locals and make them stand against the Taliban is a very good move. NATO or any other foreign forces are not there in Afganistan forever. I hope that Afghans will be able to protect their country on their own in near future.
Vitthal, Mumbai, India
Fair play to the Canadians they have always been there when they were need by Britain/Europe.
Britain would be well advised to remember who their greatest selfless ally has been down through the years.
Richard, Ireland,
We, in Canada, support our troops and are proud of the work they do in such a volatile and dangerous area of Afghanistan.
Criticism from the Americans relating to perceived shortcomings of the Canadian effort in Afghanistan is typical and to be expected. They (the Americans) would do well to take a page from the Canadian book.
Doug Rhyason, Sherwood Park, Canada