Paul Larter in Brisbane
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday

Australia’s soldiers won praise for their skills from the Boer War to Vietnam but now their exclusion from frontline conflicts has left many “ashamed of wearing their uniform”, a senior army official said.
The nation’s much vaunted reputation for battlefield courage has been cast into doubt by its own army officers, who have complained that troops are being deliberately kept out of combat roles in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Under the headline “We were soldiers once”, Major Jim Hammett, who has served in Iraq, East Timor and Somalia, launched a scathing critique of the restrictions placed on foot soldiers. He wrote, in the Australian Army Journal, that the infantry were trained to fight, equipped to fight and expected to fight — in short, to do everything but actually fight on the front line. This had fostered an international perception of institutional cowardice.
“Many within its ranks suspect that the role of the infantry has already been consigned to history . . . the on going inaction [in Iraq] . . . has resulted in collective disdain and at times near contempt by personnel from other contributing nations,” he said.
Australia’s infantry, which accounts for a third of the army’s combat forces, have not been assigned a frontline role since the Vietnam War. Only the special forces were sent on offensive operations, he said. In contrast the US, Britain and Canada, which contribute most of the foreign troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, are sending infantry troops on combat operations.
No Australian troops have been killed in combat in Iraq since the invasion but five, mainly special forces commandos, have been killed in Afghanistan. More than 4,000 US soldiers have died in Iraq.
“The restrictions placed on deployed elements as a result of force protection and national policies have, at times, made infantrymen ashamed of wearing their Australian uniform,” Major Hammett wrote.
His views were backed by another officer, who wrote in a separate article that “second-rate operational tasks” had deflated infantry morale over the past ten years. Captain Greg Colton, second-in-command of the Sydney-based 3rd Battalion of the Royal Australian Regiment, said non-commissioned and junior officers were beginning to question their purpose.
“There is a growing sense of frustration,” Captain Colton wrote. “The Government and army hierarchy seem to favour special forces for deliberate offensive operations and tasks,” he said.
Under the former conservative Government of John Howard, Australia committed about 500 special forces troops to the US-led invasions of both Afghanistan and Iraq. Kevin Rudd, his Labor successor, came to power last year promising to withdraw all 550 troops from the south of Iraq.
Lieutenant General Peter Leahy, the head of the Australian Army, staunchly defended its deployment policies, saying that missions were assigned to the best people for the task. He was aware that many infantrymen wanted “a bit more of a go”, but they had to accept that the nature of warfare had changed. “This is no longer infantry wearing red jackets and white cross straps and taking on the army of another king,” he said.
Neil James, the executive director of the Australia Defence Association think-tank, said he suspected that it was fear of casualties, rather than operational necessity, that has resulted in the increased use of special forces.
Iraq war: 2003-08 Involved in the in the invasion of Iraq from its beginning. 500 frontline troops, all due to withdraw this year
Afghanistan war: 2001-08 Troops were first deployed in lat 2001. 300 special forces currently stationed (source: www.globalcollab.org)
Vietnam War: 1962-73 More than 46,000 served in Vietnam. Battle casuallties were 424 killed and 2,369 wounded, of whom 43 per cent were National Servicemen
Korean War: 1950-53 Navy, Army and Air Force, still with the British Commonwealth Occupation Force in Japan, were committed to the war in Korea. The total Australian casualties were 1,584, with 339 killed and 29 taken prisoner of war
Second World War: 1939-45 More than 993,000 served in the armed forces. Of those on active service, 27,073 were killed in action or died, 23,477 were wounded, and 30,560 were taken prisoner of war. 8,296 died in captivity
First World War: 1914-18 More than 330,000 AUstralians served overseas. Of these, nearly 60,000 died, 152,000 were wounded, and more than 4,000 were taken prisoner, of whom 395 died in captivity
Boer War: 1899-1902 More than 10,000 Australian soldiers sailed for South Africa to support British troops engaged in the war against the Boer settlers
(source: www.naa.gov.au)
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Have any of them looked into joining the US military? It's rather short-handed at the moment.
Michael, Pueblo, Colorado, US
Shame shame on the australian politicains. The Aussie troops are some of the bravest and better troops of todays Armed forces. And also a very proud lot. They are Warriors. I would be proud to serve with them any time.
Hans, Florida, USA
Australian soldiers remain honorable despite their politicians . It's tough for President Bush and people like tony Blair to hold the line in unpopular times. I admire these men because they did not cut and run. What ever happened to our allies who were cutting deals with Sadam ?
Tom, Minneapolis, Mn, USA
Australia has stood the grounds of battles of others and served as proud and valiant servicemen Anzac's and Diggers of heart and soul... Lest we forget.
Australia's primary role today is to serve as peace builders not to serve the masters of war. it's a fine line we draw, we are proud.
Altered Sprinter, Hobart, Australia
Having been an infantryman in the British Army for 27 years with operational tours to match, and having just got back from Afghanistan i can think of no better nation have serve with us and side by side on the front line. Lets manage the risk in an operational theatre not be adverse to it.
Tim Jones, WOKING, UK
Lt. Gen. Leahy...was aware that many infantrymen wanted a bit more of a go, but they had to accept that the nature of warfare had changedThis is no longer infantry wearing red jackets and white cross straps and taking on the army of another king,
What's he talking about here for God's sake?
Paul M, Beverley, E.yorks
My heart bleeds. Australia should be proud they are not killing people.
ayla, London, UK
So bottom line is why isn't there enough dead Australian Soldiers? Why Would someone complain about that?
Zappy, Berks, Iraq/U.K.
I'd look toward your own (Aussie) gov't for the answers, the Canadians were begging their NATO allies (esp. France, Germany and Spain) for additional help in Kandahar, Afghanistan and getting rebuffed by them all, and I'm certain any offer by the Aussies would've been appreciated.
Steve, Edmonton, Canada
Aussies are great soldiers. Get them back on the front line. This is a war. Canada, the US and Great Britain will be thrilled to have them back where they belong.
Shame on the politicians and the senior command.
David, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Hell... I would be pleased to have such an allies!
Well, actually I wouldn`t refuse to have such an enemies too.
Peter, Vladivostok, Russia