Jeremy Page in Kabul
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

The lorry drivers who bring the Pepsi and petrol for Nato troops in Kabul have their own way of calculating the Taleban's progress towards the Afghan capital: they simply count the lorries destroyed on the main roads.
By that measure, and many others, this looks increasingly like a city under siege as the Taleban start to disrupt supply routes, mimicking tactics used against the British in 1841 and the Soviets two decades ago.
Abdul Hamid, 35, was ferrying Nato supplies from the Pakistani border last month when Taleban fighters appeared on the rocks above and aimed their rocket-launchers at him, 40miles (65km) east of Kabul. “They just missed me but hit the two trucks behind,” he said. “This road used to be safe, but in the last month they've been attacking more and more.”
The road from Kabul to Kandahar is even more treacherous, according to other drivers. “If the Afghan Army isn't there, a fly cannot pass,” said Bashir, a lorry owner, pointing to the scorched shells of three vehicles he retrieved from a Taleban raid on the Kandahar road last week. Of 60 lorries, 13 were destroyed, he said. “Why can't the Americans stop this?”
Seven years after a US-led invasion toppled the Taleban, that is the question now troubling President Karzai and Nato forces in Afghanistan.
Despite the presence of 70,000 foreign troops, the Taleban have advanced on Kabul this year and hold territory just outside Maydan Shar, the capital of Wardak province, 20 miles southwest of the capital.
Militants in Wardak mount almost daily raids on the Kandahar road, which also links the main US bases in Afghanistan. In the past month, they have stepped up attacks on the road from Kabul to Pakistan via Jalalabad - the main supply route for food, fuel and water.
This week they killed ten French soldiers in Sarobi, 30 miles along the Jalalabad road from Kabul. Simultaneously, they attacked the biggest US base in eastern Afghanistan. Such is the fear of a Taleban “spectacular” in Kabul, that when Gordon Brown visited on Thursday he was taken around by helicopter rather than being driven through the streets.
“We're seeing history repeat itself,” said Haroun Mir, co-founder of the Afghanistan Centre for Research and Policy Studies and a former aide to Ahmad Shah Massoud, the assassinated Mujahidin commander. “The Taleban's trying to cut the main roads to Kabul to target supplies for foreign forces, just like the Mujahidin did with the Soviets. If the highways are cut even for two days, it could also create riots in the city.”
Kabul is vulnerable to blockades because it is surrounded by mountains and has to ship in supplies on three roads leading north, east and southwest. The British learnt this the hard way during the siege of Kabul in 1841, documented by Lady Florentia Sale in A Journal of the Disasters in Afghanistan. “Khojeh Meer says that he has no more grain,” she wrote on December 3, 1841. “He also says that the moolahs have been to all the villages and laid the people under ban not to assist the English and that consequently the Mussulman population are as one man against us.” A month later, the British began their retreat from Kabul.
In the 1980s it was Soviet forces encircled in Kabul by the Mujahidin. They withrew in 1989. In 1996 the Taleban took Kabul after capturing Wardak and Jalalabad and blockading the capital. Isaf, the International Security Assistance Force, says that circumstances are different today: it has superior air support and logistics to the Soviets and the Taleban. The militants, though, have experience on their side, thanks to former Mujahidin commanders who have blockaded Kabul before.
Zabihullah Mujahid, a Taleban spokesman, said that their new strategy was announced by the brother and deputy of Mullah Omar, the Taleban leader, in late 2007. “The Taleban will surround Kabul politically and militarily to make it hard for Nato forces to receive logistic convoys,” he told The Times. “That will mean less Nato movement and will show we can make trouble in the capital.”
Local officials say that the Taleban, which derive most of their support from ethnic Pashtuns, are enlisting villages around Kabul and feeding off frustration with the lack of development since 2001. They fear that the next target will be the northern routes to the borders of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.
The Afghan Government insists that it controls the country's main roads and Des Browne, the British Defence Secretary, this week dismissed recent Taleban raids near Kabul as
indiscriminate. “In no sense have they created, or can they make, a strategic threat to the Government of Afghanistan,” he said. Brigadier-General Richard Blanchette, an Isaf spokesman, said: “We're fine for fuel and food. With the air power we have, and the quality of troops on the ground, there is no way they can win.”
But monthly foreign troop casualties are on the rise, surpassing those in Iraq, and set to make this year Afghanistan's bloodiest since 2001.
The Taleban's strategy is also impeding aid agencies, especially since militants shot dead three women aid workers last week. Ebadullah Ebadi, of the World Food Programme, said that 20 of its convoys had been attacked so far this year, compared with 30 in all of 2007, many in parts of southeastern Afghanistan previously considered safe.
The lorry drivers know the risks, but say there is no other work. “They used to warn us not to supply the infidel,” said Mr Hamid. “If they catch me now, they'll throw me in my own container, cover me in petrol and burn me alive.”
The Afghan Interior Ministry said that 76 civilians, including 50 children and 19 women, were killed yesterday by US-led coalition forces in the western province of Herat. Western forces confirmed the operation, but said only 30 Taleban had been killed.
History of war in Afghanistan
1839 British invade Afghanistan to install compliant king
1842 British retreat from Kabul; 16,500 troops and civilians killed; one
survivor
1878-80 Second Anglo-Afghan War
1979 Soviet forces invade to prop up Communist Government
1988-89 Soviets retreat
1989-92 Civil war among warlords
1996 Taleban take over
2001 US-led invasion topples Taleban Government
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Get out of that country right now! The ilegal war for oil should end and then this murder would stop. I'm talking not about the Taleban but about the US and British Armies.
The ilegal war in Iraq also need to end.
Mohamhed, London, UK
Not enough body bags home to the Uk yet or collateral murders of innocent women and children to satisfy our illegal warlust.
of course the day will come when ' our boys sacrifices' will begin to turn a few stomachs and prick a few consciences.
Until then the pointless murder and death will continue
billy, leeds, uk
Is it possible that the weaponry of the Taleban has significantly been improved? By whom? Drug money at least they have plenty. NATO stuck dead end.
Magnus Göller, Hammelburg, Germany
george in toronto: excellent point but you failed to mention the opium crop. production has more than doubled when compared to 2000 (the year before the Taliban wiped 99% of the opium in Afghanistan)
hussein, baghdad, iraq
Did anyone ever ever believe this conflict could be won.Its all about oil and keeping the military industrial complex plump and well fed
Gilbert, Kukamonga, Koukamongaland
US/NATO you lost the WAR with Taliban ,and You will retreat
Afghanistan until end of 2008 !!!
Hashim, Prishtina, Kosova
Sorry guys to bust your bubbles--America/UK are in Afaghistan on business not to fight terror. Smarten up!
Someone please let us know why England and Russia were doing in this part of the world-killing?
We know why Bush has invaded this country--oil pipe line.
911 attacks were not done by Arabs
george in toronto, toronto, canada
The western world's attempt to bring peace to Afghanistan will fail - if the real cancer - Pakistan/ISI supported Taleban is not eliminated without a trace. No amount of appeasement will work, its time the UK wakes up to this harsh reality!
George Chacko, Edmond, UK
I am extremely surprised by the behavior of world powers if plotted on time line in Afghanistan( See Above). Look at it yourself and tell me what should be the next heading?Isn't it so simple to predict but it is surprising that why everyone repeat the same mistake over and over again?
Jim, San Francisco, CA, USA
Why does the slaughter of innocent civilians only deserve a footnote in this article? How else can we consider the death of 50 children by coalition forces?
Is it a surprise that the Afghani people are becoming agitated toward their occupiers?
Does anyone even remember why the Coalition is there?
Dixie, ---,
If you want to defeat the Taliban and win the Afghan War, use the tools available. Use the entire Afghan Army to seal the borders with Pakistan. Divide Afghanistan into three equal zones with the Afghan Interior Security Force manning check points and NATO sweeping the country, one zone at a time.
James Taylor, Memphis, United States
The US claim to have killed 30 Taleban. The Afghan government say they killed 76 civilians. No wonder the Americans are losing.
Bob
Bob , Bradford, England
Let us not beat about the bush.We have an insurgency in Afghanistan feeding itself on the anger of the civil population suffering from aerial bombardment or ground action causing damage to lives and property of civil population.A sustainable peace requires a solution worked out by all stake holders.
Afzal A. Neseem, Lincoln Nebraska, U.S.A.
U.S.-led forces kill 76 Afghan civilians !!! who do we fight there???
Rick, belfast,
We were told by top British General, Taliban have been
heavily defeated and were now on the defensive, since he
said that they have expanded over half the country, we are
doing no better than the Northern-Alliance did. This is a big
test for NATO, if it fails, NATO itself is finished.
Roderick, Somerset, UK
NATO and ISAF are completely clueless, they've failed to identify and eliminate enemy bases of operation and their leadership in both Pakistan and Afghanistan. They are trying to fight this war to the standards of a Hollywood movie.
c, pierre, forest, lake zurich, USA
Sanjay, London, UK -
No reason to talk about where from the money to come; the Muslim world has enough finances to supply Taliban. Question is where from the weaponry to have conveyed. No doubt present day Russia is able to begin weapon procurement as a respond to NATO behavior regarding Russia.
Alexey, Moscow,
If only Labour read some history before this misadventure.
It doesn't matter how many troops we put in or how many rounds we fire. If hundreds of thousands of muslim fundamentalists want to die for a cause then they will keep coming.
If the allies want to secure oil, Go to the north pole!
Richard, UK,
Another successful policy of Bush and NuLab. Freaking idiots, absolutely no clue about the history or the cultures which bear an obvious influence in these areas they decide to meddle in.
Paul, Milton Keynes, UK
There's no democracy or freedom of movement for most Afghans even today. Karzai has been in power for 6 or 7 year now. I am not sure if the people support his leadership. What happen to the democratic process, elections and reelections. Maybe that is why some people are helping the taleban.
Naleen Lal, Northern California,
It is difficult to understand as from where Taliban is getting unending missiles and other weapons ,what is the source of their money- it can't be all from opium.Is there no way to cut their supplies in North west pakistan?
Sanjay , london, u.k
Afghanistan is a never ending battle as the "Taleban" freedom fighters pour in from around the Muslim world to help defeat the U.S. They've unlimited supply of fighters. The Christian Western alliance have their limits.
jayil, london, uk