Tom Baldwin in Washington and Michael Evans, Defence Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

The performance of Britain’s overstretched military in Afghanistan is coming under sustained criticism from the Pentagon and US analysts even as Gordon Brown ponders whether to send in further reinforcements.
Robert Gates, the US Defence Secretary who has been asked to remain in his job under Barack Obama, is understood to have expressed strong reservations about counterinsurgency operations in British-controlled Helmand province.
He has already announced plans for a surge of 20,000 US troops into Afghanistan but Mr Brown, who was given a bleak progress report when he visited Afghanistan at the weekend, is said to be reluctant about committing another 2,000 British troops on top of the 8,400 already there.
A total of 132 British soldiers have died in Afghanistan since 2001 and the Government is worried about public opinion turning against the campaign. British officials are concerned that the US may take over control of Helmand – where Mr Gates plans to deploy an extra 5,000 troops – if Mr Brown fails to support the surge. The Americans have grievances over Britain’s lack of equipment, including helicopters, which has left troops unable to perform the same tasks as US counterparts and led to more cautious tactics. There is also grumbling about the regularity with which US airstrikes are called to rescue British troops.
General James Jones, who has been picked at Mr Obama’s National Security Adviser, co-chaired a bipartisan panel this year which cautioned that Afghanistan was close to becoming a failed state and called for better coordination among Nato forces.
It is understood that there has been “tension and resentment” over the air of superiority adopted by British commanders such as Brigadier Nigel Aylwin-Foster, who suggested that his American counterparts needed to take lessons from Britain’s experience in Northern Ireland and Malaya.
David Kilcullen, an adviser to the US State Department, told a recent seminar that there had been “lots of fairly snide criticism” from the British whose attitude had been: “Look at us, we’re on the street in our soft caps and everyone loves us.”
He added that such claims had been undercut by the performance since then. “It would be fair to say that in 2006 the British Army was defeated in the field in southern Iraq.” At the same event, Daniel Marston, an American consultant who until recently was a senior lecturer at the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst and has been embedded with troops in Afghanistan, said that Britain was being forced to learn some humility after being “embarrassed by their performance”.
Mr Brown hinted at some of his doubts when he told reporters in Kabul: “We are the second largest force in Afghanistan and we will expect as part of the burden-sharing that other countries will do more.” Senior diplomatic sources say there is also frustration in Britain’s military over the lack of a coherent mission statement for the Nato forces in Afghanistan. This has led to problems with US forces sometimes wrecking carefully nurtured community relations in their pursuit of al-Qaeda.
Carter Malkesian, an expert at the Centre of Naval Analysis, said: “Among those in the Department of Defence who are paying attention to these operations, Britain’s reputation has probably fallen. But they still recognise that the British Army, among all the allies, are those that fight the most and fight the best.”
A British officer in Afghanistan expressed surprise at the criticism from the US. “They have few enough allies who will actually do any fighting,” he told The Times.
“It may be that our lay-down is presented as one brigade – when in fact it is far larger – and those away from the coal face simply do not realise the scale of what we do.”
A senior British defence source said: “We are punching above our weight in Afghanistan and are the second biggest contributor of all the Nato allies, so for anyone to single us out for criticism is plainly wrong and unfair.”
Yesterday it emerged that the Ministry of Defence expects its budget for Afghanistan to rise by more than 50 per cent next year from £1.51 billion in the financial year to £2.32 billion.
— A soldier with 29 Commando Royal Artillery became the 133rd British serviceman to die in Afghanistan since the start of operations in October 2001, the Ministry of Defence said. The soldier was at a Forward Operating Base in the Gereshk area of Helmand province when he was wounded by enemy fire. He was taken by helicopter to the military hospital at Kandahar but died later of his wounds. His family has been informed. The death comes three days after four Royal Marines died in two separate explosions in the Sangin area of Helmand. Three were killed by a 13-year-old suspected suicide bomber.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It is unbelievable that anyone wants to be a British soldier today. They have been sent to fight in Afghanistan with inferior equipment, Ministers keep saying they are spending billions in equipment.My answer is check the American equipment and just mach it or get them out now!!
alex jones, London,
IF they haven't got the hardware in the first place can you really say they are well trained? Remember these are only people. THe media seems to portray them as some kind of super heroe liek superman or batman. their are many incompetent people in charge of equipment who just cannot do it right
mark, london, uk
I am an ex-soldier of 23 years, and now my son is starting out his career as a Royal Marine. I am proud he has joined our armed forces. I am scared that he will not be protected because of a lack of equipment, equipment that our spineless government WON'T supply. Back them or bring them home Brown.
Andy Lawman, Church Crookham, England
The UK has insufficient infantry to properly carry out it's task, there being none to "hold" areas that have been taken in battle and the bad guys return when the soldiers move out. The quantity and quality of equipment is poor and there is very little stockpile to replace unserviceable.
Chris, Fareham, GB
Britains traditionally small and professional army is often refferred to being elite comparibly, if thats true they should be equipped accordingly. Its no good having well trained soldiers if the hardware aint there. If the US critisism embarresses the govt into action, then thanks US!!!
Steve, Leeds, UK
I am suprised, and grateful, for all of the supportive comments, from Americans, for the support of our soldiers. Thank you.
The problem Gates (even though I detest the man) is referring to, is one of Government support, which is true. Our Govt. IS failing to supply troops with kit and cover!
James Knight, seaford, UK
British soldiers are tough brave and professional. They have two big issues; they must realize that these Islamic extremists are not the IRA,they are another magnitude of ruthless killer.Didn't the IRA warn police of bombings in advance? The other problem is resources.Their govt must do better.
Eric, Raleigh, NC, USA
I really believe if the Americans believe they can do a better job,
Then LET THEM !. THEY WANT TO POLICE THE WORLD.
All british troops should pull out of both iraq and afghan, after all the number of blue on blue incidents( or is it, they are forgetting their own short falls)
The nerve of it
k brand, bradford, uk
Please we have half the men! Half the Equipment.
I have mates in out there they tell me they have contact once or twice a day. Our guys are dying every week (4 marines last week). How about the Germans, French and other guys coming up from Kabul and helping us out. Send your criticisms to them USA!
Simon, Bristol, England
Well it doesn't really matter with the way the government has cut our armed services while pouring our money down "popular, vote buying schemes". Very soon we won't be able to fight our way out of a paper bag. it's all very reminiscent of the thirties "peace dividend" Nothing learned..........
Bill, Shrewsbury, Shropshire
I think Britishes forces are right to some extent. They know the history of this region because of their past experience. Probabaly they believe in negotiationa whereas Americans beieve in bullet . British soldiers are also started thinking that why they are out of thier country just for nothing.
zaheerul Hassan, Lahore, Pakistan
Bloody nerve of the man!! For the first 5 years Helmand was the responsibility of the US, they did little and achieve nothing, rarely confronting the Taleban or local warlords. The UK took over Helmand and the Canadians took on Kandahar casualties/forces deployed show who's doing the work.
Bill, Stavanger, Norway
If the Americans don't want our help, I'd be very glad to see our soldiers brought home before any more lives are wasted in this pointless and ultimately doomed venture.
In point of fact, even if the Americans do want our help, I'd still be very glad to see our soldiers brought home.
John, Glasgow,
If British Forces in Afghanistan were to employ the tactics which brought success in the Malayan Campaign perhaps the conflict could be brought to a speedy end....besides,is the US army not large enough to operate on it.own? Perhaps British expertise and professionalism are indispensable after all.
stan urbaniak, london, UK
John, U r correct. we need 2 recognise the men and women more who r serving. If we wer not out there who knows what the al-Qaeda would be planning unopposed and another point who r the americans 2 complain about the britsh army when we re the only major force besides them out ther.
Adam, Maghull, Liverpool
Well John in Woking. During the 2nd World War my mother and her sisters spent night after night huddled under the stairs as German bombers flew overhead to rain devastation on Bristol. My uncles were training to repel an invasion from Nazi forces massed 30 miles from our shores. That threat was real
Francis Cousins, Wrington, UK
I wish that any technical critiique of our operations was kept away from the media - if there are lessons to be learnt , then that's jut fine - the British Military are adaptable. But given the way this is now in the public domain I hope the US media and body politic move quickly to mend bridges.
mark, houston,
Many NATO countries will suffer with the UK and US if Afghanistan has to be left to Al Qaeda and its supporters. But most have chosen to stand back from the necessary if dirty fight to prevent them regaining unfettered control. We (the UK and US) should reserve our ire for them.
Dominic Williams, London, UK
623 Americans died in Afghstn; 4,196 in Iraq; 138 from my state--7 from Wash DC. Wash Post offers stats. I keep count for my hometown (population 2,600). We've lost three homeboys. I'm grateful to our military and Bush for keeping us safe. It seems UK troops do not have gov't support.
Jill , Cleveland, GA
Specialist "stay behind" groups are needed in Afghanistan on extended operations and fit in well with the climate, terrain and are as good as the enemy they are seeking to destroy. The Rhodesian Selous Scouts had a similar Modus Operandi and were extremely successfull in pseudo operations.
Mike, Burley-in-Wharfedale, England
The fighting men and women of the British Armed Forces are in no way at fault, and none should be implied.
The fault lies with an incompetent and duplicitous British Government who have politicised the MoD and the role of the military and failed to resource and equip our fighting forces adequately
Peter McGuirk, Lytham, UK
It is laughable for Brigadier Nigel Aylwin-Foster to suggest that American counterparts need to take lessons from Britains experience in Northern Ireland . PIRA was like a 'play school' army compared with the Taliban. The British rolled over and established well paid political posts for PIRA leader
Raymond Atkinson, Belfast, Northern Ireland
UK troops aren't failing, it's just the most volitile province in the country, and the government aren't divirting enough funds to the armed forces, rather giving it to the bone-idle or spending iot on themselves
dan, leicester, UK
As an Argentinian who proudly took british nationality so many years ago, I am gratefull for the work and dedication of the British forces all over the world.
The lack of real support from government and intellectual classes for our forces speaks loud against a perverse policy of self flagelation.
John Zen, London, UK
But Britain has been there before haven't we? Twice. So have the Russians. We cannot easily beat a people so determined that uses 13 year old boys pushing barrows laden with explosives. We knew we would be getting into an unbeatable scrap. Thanks USA for your CRITICISM - not.
Alan, Grantham, UK
I wish our ruling classes and military top brass would wake up and realise that we are not a world power any more. The effort of the common soldier which is under equipped and under manned is being insulted by people not at the sharp end having a rose tinted idea of our power and influence.
Jay, Harlow Essex, England
We have commitment, experience & skill. What we don't have is a budget like the US. Our country is much smaller then the US & with a smaller Army we are doing all we can. To criticise us now is unforgiveable as we prepare to bury more of our friends and colleagues. Shame on the US, our friends?
D Elvidge, Beverley, England
I am sure our guys are doing the best with what they have got.
Everyone from Army Commanders to US Allies have complained about the British Army's lack of equipment to carry out their task. It seems the British government wants the kudos of the Army assisting in Afghanistan but can't pay their way.
C.Brooks, Khobar, Saudi Arabia
We worked and shared our resources in WWII. Did we forget how it was done? So our forces are called in to help them. Maybe making resourses available before an operation starts would help. Maybe getting the German troops in the field would help.
Tom, Leeper, USA
Actually, as the UK much like the US were turned into huge dodgey hedge funds - we can't afford these wars and frankly, never wanted them, so let the Americans have Afghansistan and Iraq. Time the American people demanded no more of their/our young men sent to die for a pack of lies.
Enough!
S. McCarthey, Dorset, UK
I am embarrassed by the petty criticism of the UK forces being leveled by people of influence in this country. I am an active Obama supporter and I hope that he will swiftly correct his erroneous decision to keep Robert Gates on at the Pentagon.
Thomas Barton, Springfield, Missouri, USA
The criticism should be levelled at the MOD and the Government, who have sent out some great fighting men with appalling equipment.
Either we support our Troops properly, or we withdraw and let the Americans discover what the Russians found - you just can't win a war in Afghanistan on your own !
PLH, Guildford, UK
FACT: The British army was not defeated in the field Southern Iraq.
Sounds like sour grapes! A force of 8500 soldiers who are respected by the natives, know how to execute a complex operation and are being bamboozled by an inexperienced military force that has a trillion dollars of equipment.
CNG, Chicago, USA
"Man for man, the British armed forces are the best in the world". This attitude is the death of the UK. British forces are no longer the best in the world and they need to work hard to get back there. Turning up does not constitute a victory. wake up - results are 3rd rate.
Jonny, Vancouver, Canada
The Brits, Americans, Canadian, Kiwis, Aussies (& others): we're the Good Guys. That's my team, & sometimes the members of my team don't agree on everything. Sometimes things should be better communicated--'nuff said? Let's do what it takes to finish the job... Other challenges are brewing.
Steve , Miami, FL , USA
For all the preferential treatment and favours the UK, Canada and Australia have given the USA, we have gotten little in return.
Let the USA lobby the other NATO countries, and Japan and China, for combat troops in Afghanistan.
Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada (expat UK)
People of the US appreciate the UKs troops in Afghanistan. If they are not equipped properly, that falls on Gordon Browns Govt. When American Troops arent equipped right, Senators and Congressman get called, things get fixed. Thanks UK, rest of Europe is to chicken to engage the Taliban/Al queda
Joel, Chicago, IL, United States of America
OI Gates!, who started this war in the first place? You'll be starting on us in Canada next.
arozzer, Toronto, Canada
I believe this is a criticism, not of our armed forces but of this government that leaves the troops with inadequate equipment and support.
R Harvey, Hitchin, uk
The American people love their British brothers for their willingness to join our battle. We only ask that you don't do it half-heartedly. If this war is to be won, we must not be divided as to our levels of comittment and strategy. The UK needs to put its ego aside and fight as a part of a team.
john purtell, gainesville,FL, United States of America
This reminds me of the spat between Montgomery and Patton during WWII.Let's not forget that the UK & US have been through far more serious wars than Afganistan. We have a long history of standing together. The relationship preceeds NATO by a long shot.
Let's take a moment and say THANKS!
Robert, Charlotte, US
man for man the british armed forces are the best in the world, the only problem is we dont have enough men in the armed forces. if we are going to fight 2 wars at once, surely it is only prudent to fund out armed forces comensurately? why dont we have helicopters and harriers out there in numbers?
will, grimsby, uk
It would be fair to say that in 2006 the British Army was defeated in the field in southern Iraq.
A very interesting quote !
Completely untrue...
paul, london, uk
I would point out that the criticism leveled is not directed at the British soldiers on the ground,who are as tough,dedicated and brave as their American counterparts,rather it has to do with the resources allocated for the task.Where are the other countries of NATO,where's their much needed help?
Ian, Austin TX, USA
As an American, I offer my personal apology for any criticism of the British contribution to the effort. For the loss of even one British life is proof enough.
Thanks would be appropriate, any thing else is uncalled for.
Ron Crocker, Tyler, TX, US
We are not giving our armed forces, by that I mean the young men on the front line, enough support or thanks for the job that they are doing in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Why are we neglecting to mention these people every day of the week, as they did in the 2nd world war ??????
John, Woking, Surrey