Valerie Elliott, Countryside Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Six lorryloads of turkey meat sent to Hungary last week from the Bernard Matthews plant at the centre of the avian flu outbreak were raw and may have returned the H5N1 virus to Central Europe.
The revelation immediately sparked a political and diplomatic row between London and Budapest. Miklos Suth, the Hungarian chief vet, said that he was outraged by the consignment of raw meat from an infected zone.
Poultry industry chiefs and farmers were incensed by the move and believed that it would lead to a collapse of consumer confidence in all turkey and chicken, especially as the route of the infection from Hungary to Suffolk has still not been established.
The news came as it was confirmed last night that Bernard Matthews had been given permission to reopen the abattoir part of his processing unit at Holton, Suffolk, where 160,000 birds were culled to halt the spread of the disease a week ago. Supermarkets report that the biggest loss in sales is for Bernard Matthews branded products and buyers are privately reporting to industry sources a drop of 50 per cent in the company’s products. Other poultry sales are 10 per cent down.
There also appears to be a North-South divide over the scare: many more shoppers in London and the South East are shunning Bernard Matthews meat than those in the North East and North West.
The Food Standards Agency is still searching documents and meat held in cold stores to check whether any possible infected meat has entered the food chain.
The conduct of Bernard Matthews itself is under increasing scrutiny. One Whitehall official described “quiet rage” over delays by the company in handing over transport documents listing the consignments that have travelled between Britain and Hungary. It took three days for the company to accede to requests for information.
A senior executive at the company had told ministers that meat from Hungary came only from the Sarkov plant, more than 100 miles away from the restricted zone. It was a government meat-hygiene inspector who spotted a label revealing that meat had come from an abattoir in Kecskemet, just outside the H5N1 zone.
There was disbelief in farming circles that the meat exported to Hungary last week was raw. A European Commission spokesman said that it was legal to send raw meat to Hungary provided that the product did not come from poultry slaughtered in the protection zone around an outbreak; that the meat was processed and packed separately; and that it had been held in separate cold storage.
Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat rural affairs spokesman, said, however, that even if it was allowed within the letter of the law, “Such a move was unwise and I can understand why the Hungarians are hopping mad about it, especially when the source of infection is still unknown”.
For the past 24 hours government officials defended the exports because the meat was cooked and therefore of minimal risk of spreading the virus. Mr Suth confirmed, however, that the meat was raw and that the Holton plant exported only raw, processed turkey meat, which is used for the production of sausages at the SaGa Foods Sarkov plant. These products are then distributed in Hungary, Germany and Italy.
A meeting between David Miliband, the Environment Secretary, and Borbala Czako, the Hungarian Ambassador to London, was arranged hastily yesterday in an attempt to repair cooperation between the two EU member states. Mr Miliband also telephoned his Hungarian counterpart, Jozsef Graf, and Mr Suth.
A spokesman for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs would not comment directly about the raw meat assertion and said that the matter was under investigation. Another official had previously said that there was no risk from cooked meat that had left the Bernard Matthews farm. “The heating process quickly kills the virus and therefore this meat will be perfectly safe,” she said.
Mr Miliband toured tele-vision studios to defend the containment of the outbreak and the investigations into the source of the infection.
The British authorities were informed yesterday that checks by the Hungarians on the movement of meat from last November had shown that no poultry from the Csongrad region, at the centre of the H5N1 outbreak, had been sent to abattoirs used by Bernard Matthews at Sarkov or Kecskemet.
Scientific and veterinary experts in Brussels also believe that there is no evidence that turkeys in Hungary are infected with the virus, and believe that the most likely source of contamination in Britain is the movement of people, vehicles, packaging or equipment. Transmission by wild birds also remains a possibility.
A spokesman for Markos Kyprianou, EC Health Commissioner, said the source may never be established.
A veterinary report on the precise match of the lethal avian flu strain is to be published in Brussels today and an epidemiological report into the investigation in Britain on Friday. A review of the EU rules on the trade and movement of poultry from countries with an outbreak of H5N1 is inevitable.
There is also considerable confusion about the rules. A Brussels spokesman said that the export of raw processed meat “in principle may not cause a problem provided it was processed and packed separately from any meat from poultry slaughtered in a protection zone”.
It is not clear if there is a cooking facility at the Bernard Matthews Holton plant. A company spokesman was unable to give the information to The Times yesterday.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Boycott Bernard Matthews. Why is Blair silent about this issue? The public is fedup.
Joe, London, UK
1. Biosecurity! It was a new word in South East Asia when bird flu started 4 years ago here. But it looks like even rich countries need to teach it again!
2. Again, this event emphasizes the great risk that some countries pose if their veterinary services are not fully equipped with human resources and budgets.
3. "A spokesman for Markos Kyprianou, EC Health Commissioner, said the source may never be established" Interestingly, it is the case for many bird flu reports. Governments anywhere are reluctant to put the blame on their industry or on their lack of control. Indeed, many outbreaks are due to poultry movement. But it is so much easier to blame wild birds.
Gautier Patrice, , Veterinarian in South East Asia, Hanoi, Vietnam
I live where Foot and Mouth devasted the region for a long time. I think that Bernard Matthews has behaved irresponsibly, It may cost him money to ensure that the public is protected, but rather that than loose the confidence. of consumers. I dont think that I shall buy his brand again
P.Cornwell, Tiverton, Devon
Last week I heard a government minster, state on Radio 4, that the culled poultry was being transported for incineration to another location and that this posed no risk to public health, as the virus was absent in dead birds. If so why the worry today and if not why where the birds transported anywhere after the cull; typical government confusion that leads to public fear and what is worse to loss of trust.
William, COLWYN BAY, Wales
Well thats one less thing I will be eating ! So whats the choice now, catch BSE or Bird Flu ?
alan stepney, Guildford, UK
People hve very short memories. Dont they remember the BSE problem and the subsequent CJD scare. All meat from the Holton plant should be destoyed an dthe plant totally cleaned out before any further meat products are imported or exported from the site. Has nobody got ant common sense, or are they all only interested in the financial implications of the scare. Defra needs their heads looking at.
robbie mac, marford, Wales
Damage is already done in the public trust toward Hungarian food industry. Now people will only remember the first report saying that Hungary (without ports) infected UK.
Zsolt Baldauf, Szeged, Csongrad county, Hungary
The idea that EU vets are still uttering the nonsense that 'wild birds' may have transmitted the virus to Suffolk beggars belief. Where are the dead birds in Suffolk then? The only birds to die of bird flu, died in Bernard Matthews rearing sheds. Given the trade connection with an infected region far away, and the fact that the virus is the same strain, I don't think there can be any doubt that wild birds didn't bring it here.
Like foot and mouth, bird flu is being spread by the massive trade in animals, dead or alive.
Tony Volpe, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Yet again the government put the profits of the producers before the welfare of the public. I won't be touching turkey till Xmas.
kerry livermore, London, England,
Outrage at how the Government treat the Public well-being with contempt whilst no doubt pandering to the profits of the capitalist food merchants.
If 'proper' farmers had been involved , DEFRA would have killed every turkey in the UK.
The public should bite back and shun any goods fromthat supplier for at least a year.
ian, Leicester, UK
Whatever the law says (EU or UK) the handling of this difficult and potentially dangerous situation has been grossly inept by both Bernard Matthews and HMG. Both the company and the government deserve all the public loss of confidence that is, and will be, reflected in loss of sales etc. All that was needed was openness (currently called transparency) and application of common sense. Neither party has showed any signs of either. Turkey (and BM products in particular) is off my menu for the foreseeable future. Miliband has a lot to answer for in his handling of this affair.
Gordon, Woking, Surrey, UK
Many of the assertions relating to safety in this affair seem to have been made on the assumption that, once cooked, meat is perfectly safe.
Most of the rules for domestic food hygiene are based on the premise that meat can be re-infected by careless handling after cooking.
Given that the existing rules for these plants have been demonstrated to be either inadequate or not enforced, it seems imprudent, so say the least, to assume that cooked meat will have been handled in a way which prevents it coming into contact with infectious agents - at least until the exact cause and route of the initial infection have been identified.
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK