David Charter
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Traditional light bulbs are to be phased out across Europe because they waste too much energy.
The filament bulb, which dates back to the 1880s, will start to disappear from stores within two years as part of measures agreed yesterday to reduce energy consumption.
Consumers will find that the cost of low-energy bulbs starts to fall as new EU directives force manufacturers to produce them in greater numbers, an EU official told The Times.
“We expect that legally binding eco-standards will be set for energy efficiency and therefore gradually you would only be able to buy those lightbulbs that meet the target. So effectively it would phase out the inefficient ones,” the official said.
The measure was agreed after the Australian government decided to ban wasteful filament bulbs from 2010. That led Sigmar Gabriel, the German Environment Minister, to urge the EU summit to come up with a similar plan.
Rejecting an outright ban, Chancellor Angela Merkel included plans to push “increased energy efficiency requirements” on office and street-lighting by 2008 and in private households by 2009.
Mrs Merkel said: “We need to give people a little time to change. We are not saying they should throw out all bulbs in their house today, but everybody should start thinking about what is in the shops.”
She said that most of her bulbs were energy-saving, but admitted to sharing a common complaint: “They are not quite bright enough, so when I am looking for something that has dropped on the carpet I have a bit of a problem.”
While low-energy bulbs are more expensive, they are already said to be more cost-effective because of the greater lifetime of the bulb.
The Department of Environment said that consumers could reduce home lighting costs by £9 a year by switching all their bulbs. She added that if each British household replaced three traditional bulbs with energy-efficient ones, it would stop as much CO2 emissions as produced by all of the country’s street-lighting.
Yes, you can still have pretty lights
- Stores from Woolworths to Ikea stock low-energy bulbs
- At up to £3.50 they cost more than other bulbs but use four times less energy to generate the same amount of light
- Each bulb can save up to £100 on electricity bills in a bulb's lifetime
Source: Energy Saving Trust
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Thank goodness the bureaucratic have finally forced an issue on people that is worthy of force. Less power consumption = less nuclear plants to power them. So while the measure comes too late to save the glaciers, once the older generation stops moaning about the good old days, life will go on.
Rob, Dover, UK
We already us low energy lamps in many parts of the house particularly outdoors where the lamps are on a lot and long life is important.
BUT most of our fittings indoors are dimmed ( yes I know it can be done, sort of.. ) Tthe thought of bright white lamps in my home is awful. For the time being there are no lamps with the correct effective colour temparature.
I will be one of those who will buy large stocks of the lamps I want to use and I will be just waiting for the chance to vote our moronic government out. Maybe UKIP can help ?
Bob Clarkson, Croydon, UK
I feel that this is the government imposing something that should be voluntary. The health effects of the CFL's are very real, depression, anxiety, headaches, increase cancer risks and high exposure to radiation emitted by florescent bulbs. Using CFL's will eventually raise healthcare costs. There will be an increase in patients seen by the healthcare community for symptoms related to effects of CFL use. This will have a more direct impact on the global economy than using traditional light bulbs will have on global warming.
Edward Ghosn, HEMET, CALIFORNIA
From 1990 until 1996 I lived in a 41 unit condominium building in Chicago, Illinois that had an electric bill in excess of $2500 a year for hallway lighting alone. I convinced the owners' association to spend $800 on two cases of compact fluourescent, the bulbs were something like $15 a piece and that was a deal at the time. The first year's savings was $1100, plus the part time handy man did more work around the building as he no longer had to replace ordinary bulbs, which usually burned out after 6 weeks of 24 hour use.
Peter Arena, Chicago, Illinois
If we all start using eco bulbs then I suggest we all start using night vision goggles, because the eco bulbs are useless. The box told me that it gave out the same level of light. The box was WRONG, I tried them. The bulbs were terrible, I could barely see to the other side of the room. It could save you money on your bills but you would spend the rest off your life in and out of hospital because you dont have fluorescent walls and furniture. Save yourself a trip to the hospital use normal bulbs.
peter h, london,
Phasing out incandescent lamps is one thing, but this is the 'green banning brigade' thin end of the wedge. Next will be halogen lamps used for security lighting, then metal halide used extensively for retail lighting....And of course energy saving lamps can't be dimmed, which itself was an effective energy saving technique. It's time for sane people everywhere to stand up and say enough is enough with this eco-fundamentalism. Our politicians have swallowed this rubbish for long enough, but that's a politician's nature.
L. Saunders, edinburgh,
With regards to compact fluorescents being dim, ignore the equivalent filament power on the packaging and use a general 4:1 ratio, so a 25W exposed tube compact fluorescent will be similar output to 100W perl bulb. The comparisons on the packaging are against softtone filament bulbs, which aren't what most people use (call it marketing B-S if you want). An outer glass envelope type will lose a tiny bit in the extra glass layer, but will work better in a cold or windy position where the extra glass bulb helps the tube stay warm.
The 4:1 ratio doesn't work for reflector types. For the larger ones, 3:1 would be nearer, and for the smaller ones, they can be as low as 2:1. This is because a folded compact fluorescent tube is far from an ideal shaped light source for designing a reflector. One exception here is the GE Genura 23W floodlamp, which uses a different technology and produces slightly more light than a 100W floodlamp, after a short warm up period.
Andrew Gabriel, Fleet, UK
The claims being made from Brussels and especially Tony Blair over benefits of switching over to low energy bulbs are grossly exaggerated. Most peoples experience of either type of bulb is that the quoted life span is overstated by a factor of 2 or 3 and the cost of them won't fall by much. The supposed light output is also exaggerated by manufacturers and is not as intense. Next, there doesn't seem to be any environment costs of the more complex manufacturing plant and components of low energy version. No mention is made of either low voltage or mains voltage Halogen bulbs which produce around 50% more light than their tungsten equivalent and the fact that light fittings for these types of bulbs CAN NOT take low energy bulbs. The main point seems to have been lost on Blair in that at least 90% of electricity consumption is from heating & cooking rather than lighting. Yes, there will be some savings in pollution & running costs but only around 3-5% if you're very lucky.
Mike, Denia, Spain
Fine. Nearly all mine are now energy saving. I don't need a ladder to change them. They don't seem to be as bright so go for brighter ones. Some take time to warm up. The technology is improving all the time and so are the shapes.
BUT fluorescent lamps are classed as HAZARDOUS WASTE and our local authority for one has not provided a nearby facility for their collection. Urgent action needs to be taken on this.
Philippa, London, UK
I hope they can invent one that actually gives an equivalent amount of light to the incandescent bulb. At the moment they cant. In my studio I use halogen spot lights and in the rest of the house different typesof bulbs. But to read by I need a 100 watt plus bulb. The equivalent 20 watt eco bulb is too weak, and the 30 watt version does not fit into the antique lamps i have. So the next two years will be plagued by peiople hoarding light bulbs as they hoarded leaded petrol a few years ago,
P Santamaria, granada, spain
But do not replace with single spiral type as these appear
prone to early failure in cold weather at switch on. Presumably lower temperature reducing resistance and
resultant increase in voltage etc is the cause. Have had
two go this year , but no problems with bulb type or
multiple drop tube equivalents which have been in service fault free for several years.
Myopia, Beccles, UK
This is going to save the glaciers?
Jay, columbus,oh, us
Would this be the same EU that imposes an Anti-Dumping Levy on energy saving lamps that are not made by favoured companies - making them more expensive for the consumer ?
T, Shanghai, China
What you don't say is that the energy efficient bulbs contain mercury and thus will be an ecological hazard when the time comes to dispose of them.
Colin Wilson, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Fluorescents produce a harsh, hideous light. They have been tied to childhood leukemia and other health problems ("disproven" of course in industry-funded counter studies, just like cellphone radiation danger) -- and many people simply get eye strain and feel tired in rooms lit with them. They also contain toxic mercury which poisons the environment when the bulbs are discarded, unless they are collected without breakage and properly recycled -- logistically an almost impossibly complex and expensive undertaking.
Then there's this thing called democracy -- and what more direct vote of the people is there than what they choose to spend their money on, given two options in front of them. If fluorescents were desirable for everyone in society -- everyone in society would already be using them.
Sam Lowry, Brazil,