David Charter, Europe Correspondent
2 for 1 tickets to Casablanca, this coming Monday
Proposals for a centralised database of fingerprints from across the Continent were revealed yesterday, fuelling fears on all sides of a Big Brother Europe.
The scheme for a computerised collection of personal details drawn from all 27 countries in the EU is the latest in a raft of anticrime measures in the wake of the 9/11 attacks in the United States.
Britain would be expected to contribute all the details held by police. These include fingerprints of suspects and people released without charge, as well as those convicted of crimes. The plan coincides with the Home Office preparing to expand the range of people fingerprinted to include those caught speeding or dropping litter.
The aim is for the database to be up and running by the end of next year. The sensitive information it contains could be shared with third parties, such as US law enforcement authorities.
A detailed assessment is being carried out to determine the scope and cost of the single EU fingerprint database, The Times has learnt.
The proposal, which was buried in a lengthy European Commission document setting out policy goals for next year, managed the rare feat of uniting all sides in opposition. Euro-sceptics criticised them as the trappings of a super-state, while some of Europe’s most ardent supporters complained of a threat to civil liberties.
“This rings alarm bells in terms of civil liberties and in Brussels overreaching itself,” said Baroness Ludford, a Liberal Democrat MEP, who called the project “Euro Big Brother run riot”.
She added: “Of course MEPs want to fight crime and terrorism, but individual privacy must be safeguarded. We need to know who can access this database and what the information can be used for.
“It is irresponsible of the European Commission to act like this. It is doing the euro-sceptics’ job for them.”
Officials in Brussels confirmed that an assessment was under way on “implementing a centralised database of fingerprints”. The one-line announcement of the plan as a “key action” for “security and freedom” appeared in the European Commision’s annual policy strategy for 2008.
There is no decision yet on where the database would be housed. Such EU projects are traditionally the subject of haggling among member governments.
The officials were reluctant to say if the fingerprints, from all 27 countries, would be made available to allies such as the United States in the fight against crime and terrorism, in the same way as airline passenger information.
A spokesman for Franco Frattini, the EU Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security, said: “This is something we are doing more work on, as a very important, if not indispensable, tool in combating cross-border organised crime and terrorism. So we will certainly pursue this.”
He confirmed that it was an additional project to the voluntary sharing of fingerprint information agreed by home affairs ministers in January under the extension of the Prum Treaty — an agreement between several continental countries.
Neil O’Brien, of Open Europe, said: “The European Union is gaining criminal justice powers very rapidly. The problem is that one thing leads to another and that setting up centralised institutions is then used as an excuse for further harmonisation of powers which will take decisions about criminals and victims further away from ordinary voters.
“If you are collecting a centralised database, there will then be rules about how you collect fingerprints, which have implications for how you handle different kinds of crimes. Who decides who controls access to this information? A lot of people will feel this is the start of Big Brother Europe.”
Gareth Crossman, director of policy at human rights group Liberty, said: “The attitude of the British Government is one where mass retention of biometric information is at the heart of anticrime and security policy.
“We hope the need for proportionality would be at the heart of his project and it would be for those people for whom data retention and sharing would be of use, while the experience in the UK shows that information is retained and shared because it might be of use.”
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Allow Times Online TV show, Perfect Pets help you make the the right pet decisions
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
£60k plus excellent benefits
Barclaycard
Stockton / Northampton
£
£55,000 - £75,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
£45,000 - £70,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
Walt Disney World Resort Florida SALE!
From £619 per person!
Great travel insurance deals online
I'm afraid the USA has once again surpassed the EU in implementing 'Total Population Control'. We already have a law on the books called the 'Real ID' Act that goes into affect next year. This law basically creates an Internal Passport System since it will be required that all citizens carry it on their person in order to travel. This includes travel Intrastate as well as Interstate. You would also be required to carry it in order to make purchases, open bank accounts or rent residences. Should the Department of Homeland Security decide to revoke or suspend it you would be unable to function within Society.
If that's not the beginnings of 'Big Brother' I don't know what is.
Bob, San Antonio, Texas, USA
What the hell is all the fuss about, if a murderer from Poland moves to UK comits a Rape and then moves to Ireland and comits another murder, then all 3 police forces having access to each others data is a GOOD thing.
Large numbers of people are moving around and the police would be making a mistake if they assume all crimes are committed by criminals born and bred within 50 miles of the occurance.
The advantages and disadvantages of a single mega data base, BAD versus access to multiple databases GOOd is a seperate debate.
Dan Smith, Oxford, UK
It has been already said above, but I would like to echo the comment - all this anti-terrorist security bla-bla is simply a way of blinding people to what is really going on here: you only need to watch âLoose Changeâ to realize that. Too many of those in government want to have absolute control over the man in the street because they thrive on power not on serving the people, and citing terrorism as a motive is just an excuse.
The master plan clearly is to fingerprint everyone, then collect DNA, and eventually create a monster-database which can be misused by the present and future politicians (who control the police forces). To allow this to happen would be a horrendous mistake and the time to put a stop to it is now: find a way to protest or suffer the consequences e.g. one day being arrested because that pretty vase you picked up in shop abroad later ended up being found in the home of a murder victim.
Peter Jones UK
Peter Jones, Brighton, UK
It isn't bad enough that every idiocies coming from America is sooner or later copied in Europe. Now the E.U. is trying to take the lead !!!!
P Beck, London, England
The very title of the position "EU Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security" should send chills down everyone's spine.
Timothy Farrell, Idaho, USA
The idea of define a proper multi identity collection was discussed already with no connection on security or terrorrorism and appropriate evidence of computerised collection of personal details drawn from all individual not just EU member. It depending on the accuracy of how technology can manage the distinguishing of individual imprint and related personal information.
Domenico Perri, London, UK
"Proposals were revealed yesterday"?
Er, no. The Commission's annual policy strategy for 2008 was adopted and published on 21 February.
"Buried in a lengthy European Commission document"?
Hardly. The annual policy strategy is 24 pages, and the fingerprint database proposal is highlighted as a "key action".
Gus Friar, London,
It's so easy to give up the freedoms. And it's difficult to nearly impossible to get them back.
tom, amsterdam, netherlands
What is the problem? The majority of British people are the first to claim that they want to fight crime. Yet when measures are introduced which may help do so they shout about human rights, police state, Big Brother. How exactly do you think criminals are brought to justice? By the way bomb makers do leave fingerprints....on elastic tape and inside rubber gloves.
John Hand, Bangor, Northern Ireland
PS The difference between national and EU plans for infringement of civil liberties was that, in theory, at least there are clear remedies in the British system. Pre-Blair, these were intrinsic and should be again.
I was just reading the document and found that the EU has decided on a programme of "Social Reality Stocktaking". Big Brother is stocktaking you!
Christopher Gillibrand, Brussels in exile, Belgium
The time for some sort of civil disobedience is rapidly approaching. Refuse to give your DNA & fingerprints for minor misdemeanours. DNA swabs & fingerprints without conviction is totally wrong. So are all the other multitude of surveillance & control activities being carried out daily.
I'm glad there are thousands of others out there who are totally sick of this. Didn't we have to fight for our freedom before?
Mark Duffin, Stratford Upon Avon/Shanghai, GB/China
I agree that you will all be guilty until proved innocent. This would be only Orwellian police-state and surveillance-society. If it were executed such a absurd policy in Turkey would be accused of being a police and militarized-state by the EU...
Hakan Kara, Ankara, Turkey
I can't understand why people get so upset over a few fingerprints...It really doesn't affect personal freedom as much as the dramatists make out. Surely this will benefit international security, and security is something we all want. If you've got nothing to hide then you shouldn't be worried!
Andrew, Reading, Berkshire
Funny, but I've just checked online the newspapers Berliner Morgenpost, Hamburger Abendblatt, Die Welt, De Telegraaf (Holland) and Le Figaro ( France) and none features this story about fingerprints. I think we need to be far more worried closer to home about what New Labour is doing to our civil liberties.
Mike Mitchell, Spalding, England
I have no criminal convictions. I have never had a driving licence or passport. My DNA and fingerprints are not on any database . That's the way it should be.
In the past, if your fingerprints were taken by the police investigating a crime, and you were found to be innocent of any criminal involvement, your fingerprint records were destroyed. That is as it should be.
Now Police will be able to demand DNA and fingerprints, keep them on record, and pass them to anyone they choose.
If I am innocent of any crime, then they have no right to treat me as though I might just become a criminal at some future date. Innocent until proven Guilty is the basis of British Law. There is no provision in Law to assume Guilt before a crime has even been committed.
Bribery and Corruption is common in many EU countries. They should clean up their own Laws before interfering in a Justice System that was the envy of the world.
B.P.Russell, Windsor, England
During my long career as a law enforcement officer, I admit that many times I would have relished having available fingerprints of suspects, current photos of them, and any other information that would facilitate an interrogation or an actual arrest.
But the larger question is: How much Big Brother are we willing to tolerate? It is, after all, a relatively small step from "Euro dollar" to "Euro fingerprint," thence to "Euro photo," "Euro ID card," and other massive citizen databases. There are abundant examples from the last century illustrating that "freedom" and "security" are not synonymous. Have we learned anything yet? Or are we condemning ourselves to a repetition?
Bob Otto, Lebanon, OHIO, USA
Civil Liberties v Increased personal security; I know which I would chose, along with all those who have suffered as a result of the activities of terrorist fanatics. Its not a nice world we live in nowadays.
David Dickson, Montpellier, France
Why not just barcode babies at birth.
This sort of thing has gone far too far. I'm normally pro-europe but if this is how they think they should treat citizens then we should pull out yesterday.
Sadly our current government is even worse.
rob, bristol,
All 27 EU Member States are currently implementing legislation - pushed through by Britain - requiring communications service providers to keep databases of every phone call, fax message, e-mail, SMS, MMS, etc) sent or received by every EU citizen. This was the logical next step so, if this is "Big Brother Europe", it has been inspired by "Little Brother Britain".
Joe, Brussels, Belgium
I completely agree with Michael. I have the bronze plaque sent to my grandmother by the government when her only son was killed in the Great War. It is inscribed " He Died For Freedom" He shouldn't have bothered, his sacrifice has been betrayed along with the sacrifice of millions of other British and Commonwealth servicemen who fought and died for the promise of freedom for their loved ones. 9/11 has succeeded in giving governments the excuses they needed to impose what tyrants of the past have failed to do.
It must be stopped,and soon!
Robert Hawkes, Wellingborough, England
I shall refuse to cooperate as far as possible even if it does mean I have to leave the EU. This is not the freedom that my grandparents fought for.
Peter House, Walton, Surrey
South Africa fingerprints all identity card holders and driving licence holders. Crime in South Africa (and the level of driving offences including speeding) is at levels which makes most of Western Europe look like a sleepy peaceful village. The fingerprint system has not reduced the level of crime,
To fingerprint speeding drivers and litter louts is to criminalise the offence in a manner contrary to freedom within Britain. This is another example of this administration salami slicing our freedoms away until they establish a Big Brother Orwellian state which will m,ake 1984 seem like a Boy Scouts picnic.
" To your tents O Israell"
Daniel Cramer, Welwyn, UK
This will get worse before it gets better. It will get better when a popular revolution in just one country leads to the overthrow of its government and withdrawal from the EU. (It won't happen democratically because 'legitimate' national governments will be unwilling or unable to withdraw). The movement will spread like wildfire. People want freedom. The downfall of the Soviet Union is the historical precedent.
Bring it on.
Tony Jones, Grantham, UK
I am against it, and even more against sharing it with the USA. The USA government has shown an apalling disregard for human rights over the past decade.
bill, Bristol, UK
I would like to echo Miguel Torres' remarks about CCTV cameras and the like. I feel it is strange that Brits are quick to rage when foreigners do the watching, while allowing their fellow Brits to maintain Orwellian secret rooms with loads of TV screens, which are supposed to reduce the risk of bombings, but may also lead to the surveillance state.
When I go into Amsterdam, I rarely think about Big Brother. London is another matter. I can't personally see how fingerprinting is going to increase security, set against the costs and trouble involved, but I feel that British people are far too ready to indulge in a xenophobic knee-jerk reaction against "Europeans", people whose countries, cultures, history and languages they hardly know anything at all about.
Eric Dickens, Blaricum, Netherlands
Wake up U.K its later than you think!
I went to my new dentist last week. The x ray of my teeth went straight onto a computer database which is only a broadband connection away from a national data base.
paul, whalley,
Hitler would be proud of the EU Commission slowly instigating an Orwellian police state.
Christopher Larmer, Sai Kung, Hong Kong
So fingerprinting will help fight the war against terrorism? I agree. Unless of course, the terrorists wore gloves! If they are smart enough to build and plan a terrorist attack, I am sure they are smart enough to equip themselves with gloves.
No, the real reason is control of the people. The law turned upside down. We will all be guilty until proved innocent.
AW, London, UK
The EU proving once again that they are NO better then the Stazi of East Germany, the old USSR, and North Korea. Europe is not a collection of free countries. This is not what my grandparents fought for and people died for in WW2.
Michael, Pool,
Liberal Democrats have supported this wretched project from the beginning. And they won't be the only people having a "Damascus Road" conversion this morning. I live in the centre of Brussels, 400 yards from the Parliament. At least people should now believe me. They have worked on the British principle of innocent until proved guilty with respect to the EU - the other way around over here!.
Christopher Gillibrand, Brussels in exile, Belgium
europeans need to get their act together fast to prevent this happeningt,fingerprinting would only be the start and would leed ultimatly to total control of euro populationsfight back,write to you politicians and state you will not supply prints under any circumtances not involving a crimainal conviction
Croc, Rotorua, New Zealand
To Andrew Murray: I come from Spain, I have had a so-feared ID card since I was 14, and I do not feel half as controlled in Spain as I do in the UK. Do not get me wrong, I love this country and want to live here the rest of my life, but I find it really hard to get used to all the CCTVs, checks in the airports, controls in buses and the tube, etc. So, yes, the British people have to say enough, but to their own, all-controlling government first and foremost.
Miguel Torres, London, UK
Fingerprinted for dropping litter. Really??
D.Maclean, Shanghai, China
When the public wake up and look into the hidden meaning of the phrase "New World Order" so often used by our current politicians maybe then they will fully understand the reason behind this mass intelligence gathering operation.
Steve P, Leeds, England
The erosion of our freedoms by the unelected and unaccountable continues and at some point we the British people must draw a line and say enough, no more.
I believe that day is fast approaching and politicians will re-learn that they are not our masters but our servants.
The fate that befell the Soviet Union can equally apply to the EU if they continue down the path they have chosen.
To our domestic politicians the message is clear; instigate a reform of the EU or we will remove you from office.
Andrew Murray, Forfar, UK
Ideas like a centralised EU database of fingerprints, coupled with the EU's well-known 'democratic deficit', must greatly increase concern about what exactly it is that's developing on our continent.
No body such as the EU with a severe lack of accountability should have any level of control in areas such as crime and justice.
Does anyone possibly still deny that the EU is trying to become a pan-European state?
Mike Hanlon, London, UK
Only people actually convicted of a serious crime, such as. a crime resulting in jail or prison should have to submit to fingerprinting. Sex crimes should have DNA on file.
Lois Ewing, Springfield, MIssouri USA
with fingerprints, madrid took hours to find out who the 191 killed in the terrorist attack were. in London, it took days or weeks to find out who the few people killed were. hmmm you see?
mark, alicante, spain
Well, what do the Europhiles have to say about this ... "A spokesman for Franco Frattini, the EU Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security, said: This is something we are doing more work on, as a very important, if not indispensable, tool in combating cross-border organised crime and terrorism. So we will certainly pursue this. ?
It seems to me like something that the Europhobes have been constantly warning would happen and have been ridiculed for suggesting.
Perhaps the EU has let the TRUE reason for Blair's enthusiasm for ID Cards out of the bag.
Blair obviously thinks that we are stupid enough not to recognise an EU-led pre-emptive attack on our liberties.
Vote them out and ensure that 'cuddly Dave' is forced to write a referendum on continuing EU membership into the first page of his manifesto!
Edwin Thornber, Bucharest, Romania
Ya, your moving closer to the United States, you had better pass a constittution so that you can break it too. Good luck!
Peter R, Wash DC,